Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you very much for your support!
Shooting an average of 35 points per game, bullying the soft and afraid of being hard into a brush!
The wind and clouds are changing, the rivers and lakes are surging, and Embiid's name is like the sky. However, under the fame, it is actually difficult to deserve. This season, Embiid is averaging 35 points per game, which is outstanding, and the statistics are gorgeous and staggering. However, in the playoffs, its performance is thought-provoking, is it really a data brush, bullying the soft and afraid of the hard?
1. Peerless elegance - a superstar at the top of data
In the midst of the turmoil, Embiid topped the NBA scoring list with an average of 35 points per game. This season, he is like a bright star, shining in the sky of basketball. However, behind the gorgeous data, there is a deep concern.
In the regular season, Embiid was almost unbeatable, and his scoring ability was intimidating to opponents. However, when the drums of the playoffs were beating and facing tougher opponents, Embiid's performance was a big surprise. With shooting percentages slipping and turnovers rising, the all-powerful regular-season superstar seems to have suddenly lost his shine.
2. The fall of a superstar - an embarrassing performance in the playoffs
The playoffs are a stage to test the quality of superstars. However, Embiid's performance on this stage was disappointing. His shooting percentage has dropped dramatically, especially when it matters most, and he always seems to be unable to find the crosshairs.
In the face of the Knicks' series, Embiid's performance in the final quarter was even more dismal. After four games, he had only one total rebounds in the final quarter!
Embiid's embarrassing performance not only put his superstar status in jeopardy, but also made people seriously question his leadership ability.
3. Impact and summary - what is the gold content of MVP?
Embiid's performance undoubtedly poses a problem for the league. He's ranked first in the league in points per game for two years in a row, but does that really represent his strength and value?
MVP, as one of the highest honors in the basketball world, is self-evident. However, when a data brush like Embiid occupies the top of the MVP list for two consecutive years, we have to wonder: what is the selection criteria for MVP? Is it a simple accumulation of data, or is it a real leadership temperament and ability to lead the team?
Embiid's example shows us that data isn't the only measure of a player's value. A true superstar should step up at a critical moment and lead the team to victory. And Embiid's embarrassing performance in the playoffs undoubtedly greatly reduced the value of the MVP.
4. Comments and Reflections - Is the Alliance Praising the Wrong People?
We have to reflect deeply on Embiid's performance. Is the league really picking the wrong person, and do we need to revisit the MVP selection criteria?
Embiid's stats are gorgeous, but his poor performance in the playoffs has raised serious questions about his true ability. Can such a player really become a benchmark and role model for the league?
Of course, we can't completely deny Embiid's ability and value. He is still a player with great talent and potential. However, we need to evaluate his performance more objectively, rather than blindly chasing statistics and accolades.
In short, Embiid's example is a wake-up call. In the world of basketball, statistics and accolades are not everything. A true superstar should have all-round ability and leadership temperament, and be able to lead the team to victory in key moments. And such a superstar is what we should really pursue and worship.
[The article is original, the material comes from the Internet, and the infringement reprinted without permission must be investigated!!]
Flashy and empty
The rivers and lakes are changing, and the data is as bright as a galaxy.
Embiid is famous, averaging 35 points per game.
In the regular season, he is the king, and no one can stop him.
However, the playoffs are coming, and the performance is heartbreaking.
The hit rate has dropped sharply, and mistakes are frequent and difficult to hide.
The critical moment misses the crosshairs, and the performance in the final quarter is even more bleak.
Few rebounds are like morning stars, and few points are hard to be kings.
Bullying the soft is afraid of becoming a laughing stock, and the data brush is not famous.
The MVP list has been questioned for two consecutive years.
What should the selection criteria be, and what is more expensive than the data?
The temperament of a leader is indispensable, and he is heroic at critical moments.
The ability to lead the team is more important, and victory is the last word.
Is the league picking up the wrong person? Embiid should think about it.
Gorgeous data is not a panacea, and real capabilities need to be self-reliant.
The world of basketball is a cruel competition, and only strength can be king.
Wangjun must remember not to forget his roots, and forge ahead to shine in all directions.
Sub-heading: Flashy and dazzling
[The article is original, the material comes from the Internet, and the infringement reprinted without permission must be investigated!!]