Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which will not only facilitate your reading, but also bring you the next meeting, thank you for your support.
@我是王木木
Article 21 of the Marriage Law, how should it be viewed?
Laws are never made to embody fairness and justice, but to conform to the tools of governance of the ruling class.
Recently, this marriage law has been very popular on the Internet, and I will talk about my own highlights.
First of all, if you figure out two points, you will understand everything.
1. This is not protection, this is naked plundering of sexual resources!
2. Do a survey and a statistic on how old a man in a small town or rural area is a sexual spouse and the age of a sexual partner, and you will be shocked!
Brothers, we should not feel insecure about property, it is this horse that robs women properly, it is the plundering of sexual resources.
I don't know if you have the impression that many years ago, there was such a wave of thought, and women in the new era went abroad to seek sperm and have children, or marry white foreigners.
You have to know that the impact of this kind of thinking on women is huge. Impact is secondary, what is the most important thing? On what basis, can we succeed?
When this kind of thinking becomes the correctness of propaganda, the worship of money for ordinary women is the most direct embodiment, because going abroad to seek refinement and marrying a white foreigner is definitely not something that can only be achieved by doing things in a down-to-earth manner, so it is necessary to leave production and make profits. In this way, once the women in the ordinary group are propagated by this kind of ideological correctness, they will not be able to settle in the original environment, and will inevitably flow to places where they do not work hard or have more room for profit.
For some places, this kind of propaganda, although there are women who have lost abroad, but the proportion is definitely different from that of women who have been siphoned.
So, on this basis, we can completely deduce that if you are an ordinary man, a rural person, or a small town, the property part of this marriage law has nothing to do with you, but because there is a property part, it will make it more difficult for you to court.
Who has the most to do with it? It's the middle class.
We all know that the megalopolis suck up the labor and assets of the countryside and small towns, and the sexual resources are also to be sucked.
Ordinary men had military service and conscription in ancient times, and it has been the same since ancient times, and you will not have a wife and children to have a hot kang head, this kind of stable life.
I saw some bloggers say that men can also be divided, there is no gender restriction or anything, you have to figure out the underlying logic, why do women cheer like that? That's because it's not them who really pay for labor, and there is no profit if they don't grasp labor, this is an iron truth. It's like a herd of elephants and a herd of pigs, signing an agreement to carry timber together, and the elephants will be angry, in the same way, the main labor force is still in the hands of men, as for men, it doesn't matter.
What's more, in this materialistic society, men face huge financial tests before they get married, and ordinary men can get married, and the family has bottomed out, or there is no marriage to marry, so for ordinary people, there is not much property danger, so who is in the biggest crisis? is the urban middle class.
At the time of the reform, the whole society had to be built, but now, the infrastructure is very perfect, the society needs the flow of funds, what is the best way to create GDP? In fact, it is very clear that it is marriage, a middle-class person to chase a woman, to get married once, to divorce again, the flow of money and goods this time is very objective.
Any adjustment of the marriage law, as long as there is the protection of favoritism and can be implemented in a certain place, then this place is the king.
You see! In the past, there was a boast about what Iceland and Denmark were in Europe, and how women were treated and protected, and women wanted to marry them, right? Even now, there is a large area on the Internet, and those women who married in the past did not feel as good as they imagined, and began to curse the streets again. In the same way, once a place is profitable, someone is bound to be in danger, and marriage gives women too much illusion, and there is legal protection. Therefore, it must be a siphon of a large number of women coming over, which is a cloak of civilization and a naked plundering of sexual resources!
Of course, this kind of unearned gain, magnifying greed and hatred, playing and struggling between greed and human nature, will inevitably have problems. Therefore, those women who yearn for Iceland and Denmark and marry in the past are all resentful in the end.
For example, women in Fujian can check their spouse's property, but in rural areas and small towns, it is not impossible to check, but in fact there is not much property to check, so where can there be property to check? This is self-evident.
Siphon your labor force to create resources that don't belong to you, and then make preferential legal provisions on this resource, and siphon women in resource-poor areas in the name of preferential treatment of women.
This thing is extremely lethal, in recent years, juvenile theft has been seriously blasted, headgear is not worn, masks are not worn, blatant, street glass doors, kicked open, and even have online invitations to partners. Because there are provisions of the law, the police have not done it, and the education is released after a few sentences, and the stolen merchants have to admit it.
In the same way, once this kind of age and gender becomes advantageous and profitable, it can have the effect of guidance and inducement.
To use an analogy, for example, chickens and ducks can be married, and now there is a law, and family members who drown in the water, or are injured in the water, can get compensation, you say rooster or duck, who is easier to obtain sexual resources? This is self-evident.
Women who need to work under the sun are given appropriate compensation, and women who need to work on the soil are given appropriate compensation. Why not make such a law for women who really need protection, for those who really need compensation?
That's because once it is formulated, the men at the bottom do not need to be cattle and horses, and sexual resources cannot flow. The quality, education, and wealth creation ability that women call for, no matter how high they are, are of no real use, and even if they are useful, they cannot benefit those who need them, everything is still in the hands of some men, and the labor force is in the cattle and horses at the bottom. There is no fairness, everything is nothing more than the snatching of the sexual resources of one group from another.
Some people may think that the city attracts so many women, and the men can't marry more, so what should we do?
From the ruler's point of view, if the people at the bottom, rural or small-town, if you are stable, where will the labor force come from? But what about this? In order to avoid large-scale revolt, these women still need to be supported in the end. After all, it is absolutely impossible for the state to raise it.
Here, we need to talk about the second point at the beginning of the video, how old do men in small towns and rural areas get a sexual partner? How old is this sexual partner? Based on the current situation, the average age of a male in a small town and rural area is about 28 years old, and the average age of a sexual partner is 27 years old, which should be about the same.
This is very scary, you know, ten years ago, normal marriage was about 23, and now it is not normal to get married at this age. You are not married, so to speak, but you are not married, you are thrown a bone at you, you are rewarded, or you are asked to dispose of the garbage.
I'll explain it to you with resources.
This animation, I believe everyone should have seen it, they occupy a lot of food, and from time to time they will throw some out to calm the restlessness below.
The same goes for sexual resources. Whether there are more women than men, or more men and fewer women, there is no shortage of women among the powerful, so it is inevitable that they will occupy more and eat more, then the middle class, and finally the cattle and horses. Therefore, for cattle and horses, being old is the best verification.
Brother Sicong will get married at the age of 35 next year, and you will also get married at the age of 35 next year, which seems to be the same, but in fact it is different; So, you can get married at the age of 35 to get a sexual partner, and people at 20 can easily get a sexual partner.
So, from here to understand, do you know how serious the siphoning of sexual resources is?
The kind of old and divorced ones are throwing bones to the bottom, or using these restless and unwilling bones to prevent cattle and horses from lying flat, exploiting you again, and letting your poor funds flow into society.
Give you an 18-year-old, you yourself feel unreliable, you will feel inferior and feel unworthy of others, but still give you a 32-year-old with a daughter, you will immediately come to the spirit. I have a video in front of me, a rural version of Wendi Deng, that's the case, many low-level men, doing cattle and horses to save a little money, in the end are because of their inferior roots, and this kind of woman, which increases the mobility of society.
If you look at the men who have been deceived on the Internet, where are the men? In small towns and rural areas, which women are deceived, the elderly, and the divorced.
In the past two days, this woman on the Internet, 38 years old, said that she can only marry in the countryside, I rely on it, how much I am afraid, if you calculate on this basis, this sexual resource can only be the turn of rural men at the age of 38, and rural men want to get a sexual partner, at least around 40 years old, this grass and horse, this is simply more ferocious than the Japanese devil sweeping the village! The Japanese devil is also having a good time, and this, taking care of a 40-year-old pregnant woman, the child is 20 years old, and the man is already more than 60 years old, this is a proper blunt knife to cut meat!
Article 21 of the Marriage Law, how should it be viewed?
The family is poor, marrying an older leftover girl, and going to divorce the plate, it is meaningless, if you have another daughter, it is to copy her mother's life, and fate will be reincarnated again.
In fact, in the future, women in big cities can be simulated or extrapolated. Every year, a large number of young and energetic women will pour in, and the previous women will be backlogged, layer by layer, year after year, and these women will say that they are afraid of being hurt, do not believe in love, do not believe in men, and so on.
So, when the women in those big cities say these words, you feel particularly hypocritical, and it's easy to understand. In terms of resources, it is the lack of sexual partners in small towns and rural men, that is because they are plundered, and these women have no men, they are greedy,
It is the serious overabundance of resources in this environment, the serious bubble that exceeds the market value, and the fact that they cannot see themselves clearly.
Greed and unearned competition will make some women more and more well-behaved and sensible in the future.
And this legal provision is not actually a protection for women, but to siphon young women over. Are there 40-year-old women cheering this? No, why? I won't explain it thoroughly, lest it pass the trial, I've already said too much.
Rest assured, in the future, rich men will change women more frequently, and it will be easier to get a sexual partner. Correspondingly, the exploitation of the male labor force at the bottom and the theft of surplus value will be more serious.
Many big bloggers on the Internet are saying that the West has cracked down on our culture, brainwashed women, and so on, but in fact, from another point of view, the crackdown on rural areas and small towns in those metropolises is different from the siphoning of women! It may be more serious, faster, and more vicious than in the West.
Brothers, you must be strong! Your strength is not to attract women, your strength is to avoid women, if you are not strong enough, you have to go to the comment area of this 38 women, and lick this thrown bone.
In order not to lick, you can only stop licking if you become stronger, and when you become stronger.
Don't get confused, think that if you become stronger, you can attract women, no, you don't become stronger, you can only struggle in the garbage heap of broken flowers and willows, and if you become stronger, you don't linger in the purple and red garden, you must figure out the logic of this!
Some people may say that this law is not friendly to the middle class, and yes, it is indeed not friendly to the middle class.
However, you must know that since ancient times, politics does not seem to be very fond of businessmen and bourgeoisie. It doesn't matter if you don't like the middle class, but the above likes the middle class of assets to move in society, and that's all that matters.
To make young women have the same liquidity as middle-class money, this is the future.
Men in rural areas and small towns have been cattle and horses since ancient times, and in some respects, they can be sacrificed, because they have always been sacrificed.
Thanks for watching!!
[Video transcript, welcome to the homepage to watch]
To watch the video, click here ⇒ link ||: Article 21 of the Marriage Law, how should we view it?
The picture comes from the Internet, invaded and deleted!
It's not easy to be original, welcome to forward!
I am: I am Wang Mumu
@我是王木木
I hope you are happy! I hope you will pay attention!!
What do you think about this?Welcome to leave a comment in the comment area!!