"He only pours chicken soup and does nothing to society. Recently, a doctor from the Chinese Academy of Sciences sharply criticized the tweet of the famous writer Dong Yuhui, which sparked heated discussions from all walks of life. In my opinion, this incident reflects the pressure faced by public figures, and it also makes people think deeply about the social responsibility of intellectuals.
Dong Yuhui is known for his unique chicken soup style, and his words give many people positive energy. However, the doctor pointed out that these words are suspected of being empty and inspirational, and do nothing to solve social problems. Indeed, positive energy alone is not enough, but more specific and disadvantageous thinking is needed.
But we also need to understand that different writers have different styles and orientations. Providing positive energy is also a social value, and commercial creation needs to cater to the market. We can't ask every public figure to criticize society and solve problems.
Therefore, I think that in this incident, the doctor's criticism is a little sharp, which is not entirely unreasonable, but we should also see the positive side of Dong Yuhui's work. As readers, we need rational criticism, not emotional catharsis. Writers should also take the initiative to accept constructive opinions and constantly improve themselves.
It also makes people reflect on the pressures faced by public figures. Their words and deeds are often subject to scrutiny, and small mistakes can be met with merciless criticism. However, pluralistic societies require different voices. We should be more tolerant of public figures and cherish different points of view. Rationally criticize the good and the bad, and accept the questioning to progress.
All in all, Dong Yuhui's criticism of the doctor requires us to deal with it calmly, reflect on how to understand the social responsibility of public figures, and maintain a rational critical attitude in a pluralistic environment. It is hoped that all parties will continue to speak out for social progress with a broader mind. This incident deserves us to think more deeply about the social responsibility and critical attitude of public intellectuals.
Public figures have a responsibility to enlighten society, and their words have an impact on the public. Therefore, public figures need to take responsibility for telling the truth and guiding social progress, rather than just empty and superficial words. Specifically, they can focus on the evils of the times and come up with insights to solve social problems; While spreading positive energy, it also conveys some thought-provoking ideas.
Criticism also needs to be responsible. Rational criticism helps public figures grow, but critics should also choose their words carefully, not blindly deny, and see the positive meaning of different views. At the same time, accepting criticism is also a public figure's mind. Only by responding rationally to criticism and accepting well-intentioned suggestions can we continue to improve.
We need to be inclusive in a diverse and open cultural environment. Different writers have different styles, and society needs multiple voices to coexist and complement each other. When evaluating a writer, we should not only see their shortcomings, but also correctly recognize their unique value. Only by embracing differences can we create a harmonious society.
Public figures need to find a balance between business success and social responsibility. Business needs to cater to readers, but it can't just say what readers like. Outstanding public figures can be unique in business and inject unique insights to guide social progress. Through this incident, we see the expectations and pressures faced by public figures.
However, as long as all parties uphold a rational, tolerant and responsible attitude, they can turn pressure into motivation and make public places a platform for exchanging ideas and building a society together. We're also looking forward to it – we expect more quality content from public figures, we expect critics to be rational, and we expect the public to keep an open mind. If everyone does their best, society will have a more positive public opinion environment.
Warm reminder, this article is the first work of the original headlines, it is forbidden to carry it to other platforms within 72 hours, and the rights protection function of the whole network has been opened, and the plagiarism porter has complained and reported on the whole network, thank you for your understanding