The Americans asked: How can Chinese soldiers gain the actual combat experience of American GIs without going through actual combat?

Before reading the article, please click "Follow" to facilitate discussion and sharing. Authors will live up to expectations and create better content on time and in quantity.

Wen I dreamed of the night nine songs

Edited I Night

At this moment, let go of the things you don't want to care about when you're unhappy, and enjoy your happy time

An American netizen had a big brain, and he raised a question on the American version of Zhihu Quora: "How can Chinese soldiers gain actual combat experience of American soldiers without going through actual combat?" When I saw this question, I almost couldn't hold back.

Although China has not fought a war in 40 years, it does not mean that Chinese soldiers are incapable of fighting power, and China's military strength is second only to the United States, and even if the United States attacks China one day, the PLA is fully capable of defending our territory.

Chinese do not fight because they love peace, we understand what war means to a country, once a war occurs, then it will inevitably weaken the country's economic strength, China understands this truth very well, so we never take the initiative to provoke any country.

But for the United States, they seem to prefer to use war to exploit other countries, and also practice hegemony against many small countries, because only in this way can the position of the United States be stabilized, so in the face of questions from American netizens, many people have also commented below.

One of the netizens from the United States provoked that I think China will not be able to improve its military capabilities if it does not fight, and I saw China's military parade on the Internet and found that the way Chinese soldiers walk is very strange.

If you're on the battlefield, do you have to lift your legs up and make a thumping sound with the ground? I don't think so, because it would reveal your position and the enemy would find out, and something terrible would happen.

If I am not mistaken, China has not fought a war for forty years, and it is not so much that it does not want to start a war, but in my opinion, it simply does not dare, this is completely the act of cowards, and without a war it will never be able to accumulate war experience.

To give a simple example, the reason why China was able to defeat the United States on the Korean battlefield is because China has just experienced World War II, and in the process of fighting Japan, China has accumulated a lot of valuable combat experience.

So much so that when fighting the United States, China broke out with great combat effectiveness, and now China has been in a state of no war, and they are desperate to have modern combat experience like the United States, and also want to have experience in fighting superpowers.

But unfortunately, they do not have this kind of experience, because they have not fought for many years, so the combat experience is losing little by little, and once the soldiers do not fight for a long time, then they will forget how to fight.

In fact, if China does not fight wars, then they will not gain experience in modern warfare, and perhaps China should learn from the United States and accumulate more of this experience, otherwise it will suffer greatly.

Then a netizen from China commented, first of all, I don't agree with the question you raised, even if we haven't fought in 40 years, it can't be said that China doesn't have the same experience of modern warfare as the United States, and the soldier who can pass the actual battle must be an experienced soldier?

The United States has waged so many wars, but this does not mean that the United States has rich combat experience, and it is not difficult to find from the several wars in which the United States has participated that all of them have fought weak and backward countries.

The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Syrian War, the Afghanistan War, and so on, all of these countries, without exception, were free of nuclear weapons and high-tech weapons, and their industrial production capacity was far inferior to that of the United States at that time.

The same was true of the Gulf War in November 1990, when the veteran US First Marines said that the intensity of the military operation was not as good as that of peacetime training, which shows that the so-called modern warfare experience of the United States does not exist at all.

Now that the times are changing, and the pattern of warfare has evolved from mechanized warfare to information-based warfare, whether the war can be won or not has little to do with whether you have experience in modern warfare.

This is no longer a competition in terms of troops, but an all-round, multi-dimensional system contest, combat experience is very important, but I think the advanced nature of weapons is more important, and whoever can give the other side a greater threat with their weapons will be able to achieve victory.

Immediately after a French netizen commented, the Chinese do not need the actual combat experience of American soldiers, after all, it is a very "expensive" experience, and the United States spends a lot of money on the military, which I think is unnecessary.

There are many ways to gain experience in modern warfare, and there is no need to go to war everywhere like the United States, and besides, is it worth it to use artillery to fight mosquitoes? Take Afghanistan as an example, this country is not considered a developed country in the Middle East.

But the United States is willing to spend trillions of dollars to bomb Afghanistan, which is a bit of a fuss, although the United States has been fighting wars all these years, but they have not accumulated the so-called modern war experience.

China and the United States have always had different philosophies, and we have always advocated win-win cooperation and promoting the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind. In contrast, the United States seeks to assert its hegemony, and its actions are often unjust.

The Chinese are not afraid of things and do not cause trouble, and any threat of force will not make the PLA compromise, and we know very well: once the dollar cannot continue to cut leeks, the probability that the United States will eventually use military hegemony is still very large, and the United States has played all the cards it can play in order to sanction China over the years.