Saying that Huawei is not good is a matter of position?
When Wenjie boasted about AEB, Xpeng Motors questioned the false propaganda of AEB in the automotive industry, but the masses "besieged" Xiaopeng with saliva;
The official public account of the world has also had a strong response:
In November 2023, Yu Chengdong responded to the AEB controversy at Huawei's smart mobility solution conference: "The AEB capability is a small case for Huawei, 'a pice of cake', and Huawei's GOD (general obstacle detection capability) far surpasses the capabilities of ordinary AEBs. In terms of intelligent driving, Huawei still has a lot of capabilities that have not been released, and it is only the tip of the iceberg at present."
A traffic accident has made the masses see the quality of the car clearly, but there are still many people who don't want to see the negative evaluation of the world, and label others with colored eyes and wear hats.
1. At the new car press conference, Huawei Wenjie released a test video of the M9 being sandwiched by a large truck before and after the "A-pillar, B-pillar, and C-pillar" were not deformed.
2. Huawei executive Yu Chengdong has also repeatedly promoted Huawei's AEB function as far ahead, and claimed that "it is the first place in all tests, and there is no second place." ”
The 215,900 yuan Xiaomi su7 successfully recognized and immediately stopped at 135km/h, and the 284,800 Wenjie M7plus, with a speed of 115km, rear-ended?
3、After the M7plus spontaneously combusted,The related video is gone,There is no hot search for a few minutes;Followed by many media said that the M7puls is not the Huawei AEB solution that Yu Chengdong focuses on promoting,And said that it uses the Bosch intelligent driving system。
Bosch still gave enough face and did not make a statement before the official reply of the question, but the official statement did not mention what driving system was used, and then Bosch made an official statement. It can be seen that the question world is not only not good in quality, but also has no virtue.
4. Yu Chengdong said at the press conference: "I keep seeing many cars burning, and at present, we have 0 cars in the world, and none of them have been burned."
5. Huawei once stated: "We will not build cars within five years", and the result is that Cialis has continued to fall sharply, but Yu Chengdong has made a high-profile platform for the question, saying that Huawei does not make cars but does driving systems, and the driving system is not a car? Isn't this an excuse for messing around? The result is that Cialis has been on the board for more than ten days, and retail investors can't buy it at all.
6. What's even more coincidental is Huawei's official statement that it will not do car bu, and the relevant car companies have increased the price again.
7. Some media Chenghua Automobile Part wants to be independent, and the official has come forward to deny that Huawei's automobile part will be done separately in nine out of ten, because cars are prone to car accidents, which is very unfavorable to the image of a company with high hopes.
Love goes both ways, we love Huawei, so can Huawei bring down the price of its products for the sake of consumers? Why does Xiaomi bring down the price? Has Huawei really considered consumers? If Wenjie Auto wants to be far ahead of the world, the price should not be life, and exaggerated propaganda may lead to the loss of human life.