Text丨Shuangqi Town Inn (We don't have much time in this world, it's not worth wasting time trying to please those vulgar and despicable scoundrels!)
Is there only human nature and no animal nature in minors? This is definitely an idealist statement—idealism to the extreme!
On the contrary, people with normal ideas know that minors usually have no sense of right and wrong, and they tend to have more animal nature than human nature. If the original family of the minors does not carry out the education of the good and the reasonable, the honor and the shame, they will inevitably become the real predators and destroyers, and it is unlikely that they will be the defenders and gainers.
Since the end of the last century, the educational experts who are like a group of demons have seized the opportunity to take advantage of the situation and successfully completed the accumulation of primitive capital dripping with blood and filth. The ideas they peddle have now been deeply rooted in the marrow of people with the material abundance of the times, and cannot be eliminated.
In other words, if the times are still in a period of material scarcity, people will calm down and are less likely to allow their children to waste their parents' hard-earned money, and also waste their lives to do whatever they want, let alone attribute their children's learning failures to others.
However, the material of the times has reached a period of extreme abundance, relying on the real estate dividend, everyone seems to think that they are from a prominent family and have excellent genes, they do not care about the bad deeds of their children, they see it as personality - like colorful hair flying in the streets, they will also attribute their children's learning failures to the incompetence and inferiority of the teacher group - life is good, the crowd has developed an absolutely refined egoism, and how can it be done without looking for a scapegoat?
People are not six groups of Hui Neng. Huineng thinks that "it's not the wind that moves, it's not the banner that moves, it's your heart that moves", but now everyone thinks that "it's not me who caused the trouble, it's the wind that caused the trouble, it's the flag that caused the disaster".
Of course, twenty years later, when the concept of extreme indulgence peddled by these education experts has become a fatal proliferation - tragic bullying and being bullied, the education experts have already achieved fame and are already old, and they can only "brush off their clothes and hide their merits and fame", and no longer express their high opinions on today's bullying and being bullied.
The "fork poles", "horses and birds" in the spare education ecology have inherited the mantle of education experts in the past and have begun to turn the education ecology into a bloody river and lake. They raised their butcher's knives to their peers: You must carry out what education experts call "appreciation education" and "happy education" for students, and there must be no punishment and education! We are a service industry, no different from washing our hair and feet, and we should not have any sense of sacredness! We should bow down at the feet of students and their parents!
Minors I know: call the police, refute the teacher, all in one go!
Twenty-six years of front-line teachers with junior titles, of course, there will be some relevant cases to tell you.
This case is from my rotation destination school, one of the top schools in the region.
This case is actually a case that the teachers in this office mentioned in their discussion a long time ago, but I didn't dare to record it at the time - I was afraid that my peers would inadvertently brush it up, so I took a seat!
After all, everyone knows that this child's status in the family is quite respectful: if he disagrees, he will speak ill of his grandparents who love him the most, and even add fists and kicks.
However, other people's grandfathers and grandmothers have always been unimpressed: What bad intentions can such a young child have? If he is scolded twice, he will not be able to grow up; if a child is so weak, if he is beaten a few times, it is not equivalent to scratching an itch? Moreover, his own children can beat and scold people since they were young, which is completely suitable for the current social atmosphere -- the law of the jungle is the strong! When your children grow up and go to society, you can provide a little bit of network resources, and with your children's emotional intelligence, can't you still worry about reaching the top of the crowd pyramid?
Of course, this child is already like this in front of his grandparents, and even more so in front of his parents! Mom and Dad are the spoiled bad generation, this is the spoiled bad second generation!
This student is in class, but only nominally "class". He often walked around the class and laughed at will, completely ignoring the teacher's admonitions. Note: If the teacher follows the "moral" approach at this time, the student will inevitably lead the rest of the class to a place of no return, and academics may be
Please admit one thing: the current crowd has formed an impregnable trend of thought - corporal punishment and criticism of children are absolutely not allowed!
In this case, the teacher's preaching effect is almost zero - the students instead regard the teacher as a clown, and the teacher's preaching as Tang Sanzang's nagging. It can only be said that as long as the teacher does not sacrifice himself in front of the Buddha to "cut meat and feed the tiger" to make a tragic redemption, he will not be able to touch the soul of this child, right?
In desperation, the teacher could only let the student move on a stool and sit on the outside of the classroom door for two consecutive days, and then the teacher stood at the door to give a lecture, isolating the student from other students by physical cutting, forming a battlefield block, and the teaching order in the class was a little better.
But this is obviously not a long-term solution, and the teacher does not want the student to remain this way for a long time, and the teacher wants to see the result that the student can change his past mistakes and become a good student.
So, the teacher contacted the student's mother and asked her to take her child home for some reflection – do you think that's too much?
This practice brought unjustified disaster to the teacher: after the student returned home, because he was "under house arrest" and criticized by his mother, in addition to beating and scolding his grandparents and parents as usual, he actually called "Six Doors", claiming that his right to education had been violated, and he wanted to die - the teacher had driven himself to a dead end!
The uproar was so loud that the teacher had to go to the scene and face the student face to face under the burning gaze of the neighborhood and the "six doors".
Of course, the teacher regretted all her decisions: if she could do it all over again, she would definitely tell herself, "I'm not angry, I'm not angry with myself?" She won't interfere with this student anymore, but will allow this student to completely ruin the conduct and learning of the whole class!
The teacher knelt down on the spot and made a decision: he could go back to school immediately, without having to reflect at home!
However, an even more embarrassing scene appeared - the student yelled irritably and hoarsely, "You let me sit outside the classroom, what can I learn?!"
That's pretty lethal, isn't it?
Now, the kid seized on this and didn't talk about his own nature: even if he was in the position of a top student, he could be the leader of the evil trend in the class, and the student was transformed into a good boy who loved to learn, and it was the teacher's wrong behavior that caused everything that had happened before—the reason why he was evil to the class in the first place was because he could have expected the teacher to put him out of the classroom!
The farce didn't end well – the teacher walked away in plain sight, and the student returned to school as a hero.
Filler
In the age of material abundance, minors should not be overindulged. To some extent, the twenty years after 2000 are the lost twenty years in our education ecology.
In the past 20 years, minors have naturally become extremely domineering from pretending to work hard to win the commercial indulgence of mass production by education experts.
This kind of tyranny is very easy to become the soil for the growth of poisonous mushrooms. Among the many poisonous mushrooms that grow on this soil, the one that most silences the parent group of students is called: bullying and being bullied.
Of course, in this kind of educational ecology, the group of teachers can only be speechless - talk about criticism, punishment, and so on! Am I wrong?