According to a report by RIA Novosti on April 25, Russia said that the United States has directly intervened in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but this cannot change the outcome of the special military operation. Russia believes that although the United States wants to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles, F-16 fighters and other weapons, this will not change the situation of the war.
Sullivan said at the White House that although the United States has resumed the supply of weapons to Ukraine, the Ukrainian army is still under a lot of pressure on the battlefield. Sullivan stressed that in the coming weeks, the Russian army may achieve new successes.
However, the White House, which says that it "will not send troops to Ukraine", and NATO, which has repeatedly emphasized that it "does not seek to break out a military conflict with Russia", have actually been fighting hard.
US Army General Williams said that NATO's military exercises in Europe are actually aimed at Russia. The New York Times revealed that in the event of a war with Russia, NATO troops will immediately go to the three Baltic states.
There are three main problems facing Russia now.
Although the United States warned Ukraine and clearly told Kyiv not to use these missiles to attack targets in Russia, and Ukraine also gave the promise that the United States wanted, Russia did not believe it.
Russian Ambassador to the United States Antonov said that Ukraine's alleged promises are lies.
Previously, the United States had called on Ukraine to "not attack Russian energy facilities", but Ukraine ignored it. For now, the United States may be doing it on purpose - the White House knows that Kyiv will not listen to the United States, but the United States wants to take the opportunity to draw a line with Ukraine to avoid retaliation from Russia.
How to give the United States a warning on this matter has become a question that Russia has to consider. It is possible that the United States is testing Russia, and if Moscow sits idly by, the United States will be more emboldened to provide Ukraine with stronger and more lethal weapons.
Problem 2: In the face of NATO troops rushing to Russia's border, should we make arrangements in advance? After Russia "beheaded" Polish General Malchak in Ukraine and gave NATO officers hiding in bunkers to "one pot," NATO did not stop stinging Russia.
Needless to say, the United States, Britain, and Poland, even Germany, which was militarily constrained, was unwilling to be subservient to other countries. On April 23, more than 3,000 German GIs conducted military exercises in Lithuania, just 50 kilometers from the Kaliningrad border.
It should be noted that the military exercises will continue until late May, and the main content will include the defense and counteroffensive in Lithuania.
A few years ago, who would have thought that the defeated country would actually be able to send troops to Eastern Europe under the nose of the United States? The White House chose to turn a blind eye because the United States wanted to use the method of military relaxation in exchange for Germany's participation in the blockade or even the siege of Russia.
Lukashenko believes that the deployment of a large number of German soldiers in Lithuania means that Germany has not learned any lessons. In Europe, the United States and NATO have at least 110,000 troops deployed.
Putin may not have expected that France would choose to exercise restraint. Russian intelligence has indicated that 1,500 French troops will go to Ukraine in April, but at the end of April, it seems that the French army has not yet appeared in large numbers in Ukraine.
When the US House of Representatives supported the confiscation of frozen Russian assets, the EU refused to do so. Florian, the leader of the French Patriot Party, said that the confiscation of Russian assets was tantamount to "shooting itself in the foot", and that Russia also had a lot of French assets. Florian believes that there is no advantage in France confiscating Russian assets.
Previously, Macron had also warned that the confiscation of Russian assets violated international law. Macron believes that doing so will hurt the euro's global influence and will outweigh the losses.
Of course, the possibility of France and Germany singing duets is not impossible. When France hinted at sending troops to Ukraine, Germany did not support it. Now that Germany has increased its troops on the Russian border, France has changed its face again.
If it's just a coincidence, isn't it too coincidental?
Problem three, if American officers really enter Ukraine, or if US military vehicles deliver weapons to the front line in Ukraine, will Russia fight back, such as launching a "decapitation" operation?
To fight or not to fight, this question will give Putin a headache.
With the deep involvement of the United States and NATO in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the confrontation between Russia and NATO could escalate at any time.
As far as the United States and Russia are concerned, how to prevent the situation from getting out of control is an issue that needs to be considered. If a military conflict breaks out between the United States and Russia, the whole world will be affected, which is not in the interests of mankind and is not the result that the United States and Russia want to see.
Finally, he still called on the United States and Russia to exercise restraint, because endless wars will only bring pain and suffering to mankind, not to mention the outbreak of conflicts between military powers such as the United States and Russia.