Ignorance is omniscient, and this is how the essence is. For example, the sun does not have a heart to take care of things, but there is nothing that does not shine. Unphotographed and unilluminated, it was the essence of the day. The conscience is ignorant, but now it must know, and it is doubtful that it is ignorant of it, but it cannot be believed.
Hatsukai
Ignorance is omniscient, and the essence is what it is. It's as if the sun didn't have the intention to shine on everything, but it didn't shine on anything. Unilluminated and unilluminated, it was originally the essence of the sun. The conscience was ignorant, but now it has to know, and it is omniscient, but now it suspects that it is ignorant, but it is not convinced of the conscience.
Pot Tianshan people interpret
Conscience is the ontology, so what does the ontology look like, and how does it work? Mr. Yang Ming makes it very clear here. Conscience is to man what the sun is to all things.
The sun does not shine on things, but it does not shine on nothing. Why is this so? Because the sun naturally has the property of shining and heating and naturally shines on all things, and the sun does not need another heart to shine on all things. Unilluminated and unilluminated, it was originally the essence of the sun. As an ontology, the sun is beyond the illumination and non-illumination, that is, the illumination and non-illumination, and it is no longer within the scope of the sun's own self-being, and the sun does not need to care about the question of illumination or non-illumination.
If we understand the relationship between the sun and all things, it will be easy to understand the relationship between conscience and man. Conscience, as the ontology, is free and self-sufficient, beyond knowing and not knowing, capable and unable. When we talk about the subject of conscience knowing or not knowing, we are already far from the ontology of conscience, and we are no longer talking about conscience. Conscience is naturally omniscient, just as the sun naturally shines on everything, which is inherently a characteristic of conscience. Isn't it ridiculous for people today to doubt their conscience as if they suspect that the sun's light cannot shine on things? In the final analysis, it is just that people do not understand their conscience and cannot firmly believe in it.
Conscience knows everything, so why is it wrong to say, "Conscience was originally ignorant, but now it has to know"? This is because the natural state of conscience is immobile and empty, this is nothing, and at the same time it is extremely sensitive, it can perceive all things in the world, this is the spirit, in addition, it can also perceive everything, the candle shines faintly, this is the light, and finally it can look back and look inward, and see oneself, this is awareness. Conscience has the characteristics of virtual clarity and spiritual awareness, so once it communicates with external objects, it naturally knows everything, and there is no need to add anything to it.