On April 24, Jin Canrong, a well-known professor, reposted a screenshot on his personal social media, which read: "Anti-American pioneer - Jin Canrong personally sent his son to study in the United States, personally held a wedding for his son in the United States, his son and daughter-in-law immigrated to the United States, transferred his funds and assets to the United States, has American nationality, and can land in the United States at any time."
In this regard, "Political Commissar Jin" commented: "It seems that every platform has made this rumor, and there are quite a few. It's quite lacking in morality."
Many "gold fans" unanimously applauded this rumor, believing that their "political commissar Jin" had finally fought back, and the rumor would have been self-defeating.
However, ——the author thinks that Jin Canrong, who was once the champion of liberal arts in Wuhan and a top student of Fudan University, and later became a professor and scholar at Renmin University, cherishes the expression and content of rumors like gold, in fact, it is not really possible to "shallots mixed with tofu - clear and clear".
On the contrary, because such a vague and overly simplistic expression cannot give people a completely convincing reason and basis, and it is even possible that under the "worst malicious speculation", people will think that Professor Jin is playing a kind of trick of concealment with his best language expression, right?
Why do you say this? Because this "rumor" forwarded by Professor Jin himself does not express a single content -- it includes "Is his son studying in the United States?" "Is he personally sent to the United States?" and "Is his son and daughter-in-law holding a wedding in the United States?" Did the son and daughter-in-law immigrate to the United States?" "Did Jin Canrong transfer his funds and assets to the United States?" and "Does Jin Canrong himself have American citizenship?"
Then, Professor Jin only summed it up with one sentence of "rumor-mongering and lack of morality", which is obviously too general and vague -- if he clearly said: All these contents are rumors! Then there is no question of questioning and unconvincing, but Professor Jin's expression is obviously not clear, definite and affirmative!
For example, although I don't know whether Professor Jin "personally" sent his son to study in the United States, judging from the current online information, it seems that his son studied in the United States and studied for a master's degree and a doctorate, which seems to be basically a certainty.
It can be seen from this that Professor Jin only used the expression "rumor-mongering, quite lacking morality" to refute the rumor, either it was too casual, or, it may have been done intentionally - for example, in order to get by, he wanted to bundle up and package the fact that his son had indeed studied in the United States in this refutation of the rumor.
It is said that it is very normal for his son to go to the United States to study for a master's degree and doctorate, even if it is true and he personally sent it.
You must know that Jin Canrong himself was first sponsored by the "Ford Fund" to study at the School of International and Public Affairs of Columbia University in the United States, and then he was sponsored by the "Asia Fund" to study at the Department of Political Science of the University of Lagos in the United States?——.
So, what motives and reasons does Lao Jin have for wanting to get away with the rumors when he wants to refute the rumors here?
In fact, this has to mention that back then, Jin Canrong once expressed such an anti-American patriotic education when he faced the audience in a video program:
At that time, Jin Canrong said: "We still have to admit that graduate education in the United States is very good! But American middle schools and public middle schools are failures! Don't send your children to the United States as soon as they are junior high school, then they will be abolished -- you know, public middle school education in the United States is a complete failure."
"Then, the undergraduate education in the United States is not fundamentally different from ours, and now our undergraduate education has caught up. The main thing that's good about it is that the graduate education is good. So, some of our parents want to send their children to ......."
Jin Canrong's words are often used by his critics to ridicule him as a "personality schizophrenic" who "talks a thing and does a thing", and therefore identifies him as one of the great practitioners of "anti-beauty is work, and going to beauty is life".
In fact, if we look carefully, Lao Jin is still very particular about what he says - in this passage, Jin Canrong only said that "American middle schools and public high schools" are complete failures and will abolish children, but he deliberately excludes the "graduate education" in the United States.
However, Professor King does not give the reasons, reasons, and evidence for the complete failure of American public education, so the logic of this statement in his entire discourse is still a little incomprehensible and unconvincing: what conclusion can Professor King conclude with the complete failure of "American public high schools" alone?
Is it true that Chinese let their children go to the United States, or they all go to "American public high schools"? Obviously not necessarily? In addition, does this mean that this is not the case with private middle schools in the United States? Otherwise, just belittling the "complete failure of public middle schools" in the United States can prove that all secondary education in the United States has completely failed?
Obviously, it is difficult to have a credible logical chain to explain why the United States is developed when it reaches higher education, and can it lead the world in science and technology, and win one Nobel Prize after another?
Moreover, Professor Jin's son happened to go to the United States to study for a master's degree and a doctorate, and Jin Canrong did not belittle but praised the graduate education in the United States - is this a bit tailor-made for himself to avoid being manipulated and attacked?
Therefore, Professor Jin's "anti-American" expression, which is "only a little bit and not comprehensive", can only make those who don't like to think and analyze it produce instant pleasure, but if you have a little brain, use a little brain, and analyze it in a little detail, you can feel that such an expression is too "selective" and generalized, and the final power of the argument will become weakened, or even reversed.
In this way, it is not that the "anti-American pioneer" like Professor Jin is bad, but that with the continuous improvement of the people's knowledge level, the gradual strengthening of cognitive ability, and the cultural environment of more and more open people's wisdom, representative figures of "patriotic positive energy" like Professor Jin still need to keep pace with the times!
We can't just say that "the heavy rain in Zhengzhou is caused by US meteorological weapons"; and what else is "by the end of this year, if the Chinese People's Liberation Army Air Force has 400 J-20s, then it is not China's sky, and Asia's sky is all Chinese" and so on.
In fact, the treatment of rumors is very simple, one is to directly show the evidence: for example, Professor Jin posted the proof that his son and daughter-in-law held a wedding in China; for example, he posted his personal income and the details of his financial transactions; and he posted the passports of his whole family, including his own, to prove that their old Jin family is a "patriotic family" rooted in China.
Second, for the rumor-mongers, Professor Jin might as well sue them. In a society governed by the rule of law, defending rights in accordance with the law, and giving justice to our great patriots, such a refutation of rumors and cracking down on rumor-mongers is the most powerful - of course, at the time of the trial, Professor Jin still has to produce evidence to prove his innocence, as mentioned in Article 1!
Therefore, no matter how influential the "Internet traffic patriotic performance artist" is, don't think that you can still stay in the "era of fools" by casually washing your brains to those ignorant and fearless groups, and you can achieve the "era of foolishness" of "peeing and following the flow in the Yangtze River" and capturing a large number of men and women! [Original Comment: Yu said that it is still closed]