Swordsman Gao Tian Three Musketeers
Caption/ Datang Three Musketeers
Everything is difficult at the beginning, and the hardest to start.
The new officer system and the Law on the Protection of Veterans involve a variety of demobilization placements for officers and non-commissioned officers, which have been made clear, and it is a head start, that is, the "first part" we often say has set the tone, and the most crucial thing is how to carry out the implementation of the "next chapter".
As far as the current situation is concerned, the Regulations on the Resettlement of Retired Soldiers are a concrete embodiment of the various retirement resettlement of officers and non-commissioned officers. The Regulations on the Resettlement of Veterans involve a set of policies shared by officers and non-commissioned officers, which have been drafted, and there are existing resettlement regulations that can be referred to, that is, the Law on the Protection of Veterans.
"Follow the law and govern according to the law," I would like to make a few comments.
retire.
In article 21 of the Law on the Protection of Retired Military Personnel, the State shall properly resettle retired military officers by means of retirement, transfer of employment, monthly payment of retirement pensions, and demobilization. When it comes to retirement, according to the order of placement, it can be seen that putting retirement in the first place is not only the most difficult coefficient, but also the most favorable security policy.
In article 22 of the Law on the Protection of Retired Military Personnel, the State shall properly settle retired non-commissioned officers by means of monthly retirement pensions, self-employment, job arrangement, retirement, and support. Judging from the order of resettlement, it is in accordance with the "easy first and then difficult" resettlement method, and retirement is placed in the penultimate position, which is different from the order of retirement of officers.
"Where resettlement is transferred to the people's government in the form of retirement, the people's government of the place of resettlement shall do a good job in service management and ensure its treatment in accordance with the combination of state guarantees and socialized services." In this passage, the provisions for officers and non-commissioned officers are consistent in their orientation and content.
Two core elements can also be extracted: state support and socialized services, and it can be seen that the retirement of officers and non-commissioned officers in the future is oriented to the treatment of "double guarantees".
In terms of the current retirement age and military age involving officers and non-commissioned officers:
First, if you reach a certain age in military service, you can make retirement placement. Under the new officer system, the conditions are met for 26 years as an officer, or at least 50 years of age and 10 years as an officer.
Second, those who have completed 30 years of military service may be resettled for retirement. Officers and non-commissioned officers who have 30 years of military service or working time (if they are officers, they are required to serve as officers for 10 years), they may make retirement placements after applying for and with the approval of the organization;
At present, the universal retirement is based on military age, age, and of course, there are also those involved in "retirement from the wounded, sick and disabled".
As for the retirement of non-commissioned officers, the attention to whether the service life of middle and senior sergeant majors is extended will also indirectly postpone the extension of retirement.
For large organs and officers and soldiers stationed in first- and second-tier cities, retirement is the most favorable way for officers to protect their interests among all the ways to retire. However, for officers and soldiers at the grass-roots level and in hardship areas, especially those who have been married for a long time and have been separated from each other for a long time, in such high-altitude areas as Tibet, the coefficient of difficulty for these people to retire is relatively large. What is more realistic is that at the grass-roots level, the number of sergeant majors who can work until retirement is not large.
Among the majority of existing grass-roots officers, there are probably not many who can do their jobs until they retire; the ranks of non-combat units have generally been downgraded, the number of personnel has been reduced, and it has been extremely difficult to think of communicating in the past; if the length of service and treatment are improved, the transfer of jobs is tightened, and the monthly treatment is reduced, no one is willing to leave. Accelerate the flow of personnel, increase the attractiveness of service, use scientific and accurate policies to formulate policies to retain people, and solve problems from the source.
Job transfer vs job placement
Involving the work of officers and non-commissioned officers, in the provisions of the Veterans' Protection Act, officers are referred to as "transfers" and non-commissioned officers are "arranged work". If you have to say that the names of the two are not the same, it may be a distinction between identities. However, when it comes to the details of placement, there are differences between the transfer of officers and the arrangement of non-commissioned officers.
In article 21 of the Law on the Protection of Veterans, where a person is resettled by way of a transfer of employment, the people's government of the place of resettlement shall arrange the post on the basis of the conditions of his or her political integrity and ability, as well as the position, rank, contribution, expertise, etc. during the period of active service, and the needs of the work, and determine the corresponding job level.
In article 22 of the Law on the Protection of Veterans, where a person is resettled by means of work arrangement, the people's government of the place of resettlement shall arrange a job position on the basis of his contributions and expertise during his active service.
In contrast, officer transfers are the same as non-commissioned officer assignments:
(1) Subordination of the place of resettlement. The leading role of docking is the locality, and in the future, the resettlement will also focus on the main responsibility of the locality, supplemented by the army.
(2) Contributions and references. That is to say, whether it is the transfer of officers or the arrangement of non-commissioned officers, the contribution during the service period is related to the quality of the work resettled after retirement, as for the specialties vary from person to person, of course, priority will be given to the professional job requirements of the employer, and having a certain proportion of qualification certificates may have priority in the future placement work.
Again, the different places.
(1) Keywords for the transfer placement of officers. Judging from the content of the Veterans Protection Law, there are 5 keywords: moral integrity, position, rank, contribution, expertise, and demand. The main focus of officer transfer is prominent, the ability and integrity reflect the employer's consideration of the quality of officers' conduct, the job focus is given priority to "four types of personnel", especially for the experience of the chief officer, the rank is the key corresponding to the officer 19 level is also the future corresponding to the civil servant level, as for the contribution, strength, and demand are the auxiliary conditions placed in the transfer.
The transfer of employment involves officers, and there are quotas or targets before; the arrangement of work, involving non-commissioned officers, is the placement of instructional work. To be more specific, the former has a higher resettlement threshold, and the latter will have a lower resettlement threshold.
(2) The length of service of officers and non-commissioned officers.
In fact, there are two kinds of current situations for officers to change jobs: First, if they take the initiative to apply, there is indeed a quota, and the unit leaders approve it, they can be transferred; second, they have not submitted an application, the quota is limited, even if there is a quota, the unit leader approves and requests, and in the end, the transfer cannot be achieved.
The current "Active Officer Law" involves the minimum number of years of retirement of officers, 8 years for platoon ranks, 10 years for deputy company, and 12 years for consecutive years, although it is said that the lowest, but it is indeed difficult to retire, the new officer system policy, "6 + 3" retirement mode has, the cadre age is 6 years and the rank age is 3 years, from the perspective of military age, 10 years plus the rank age can be retired, in fact, the difference with the previous minimum service life is not much.
The completion of the minimum length of service, from the original intention of the policy, is that the officer profession has its inherent inherent particularity. It needs to have a certain stability and mandatory, therefore, a minimum service condition must be designed, in addition, the title of 3 years is completed, the purpose is to guide officers to serve for a long time. The minimum number of years at this rank can only be retired, and this system has long been adopted in the US military. As for whether many officers and men are transferred or demobilized in the "6 + 3" or not, there is actually no need to dwell on this, "6 + 3" is the lowest threshold for retirement, and they can be transferred to another profession or demobilized.
The number of years of work arranged by non-commissioned officers can be divided into several groups:
The first category, in the latest "Military Service Law (Draft)" has been mentioned, after 12 years of service can be arranged work, from some local resettlement department feedback information, 12 years of service for the sergeant arrangement work in the local areas increased year by year.
The second category, involving the service of four-level sergeant majors who have served for more than 16 years, whether to extend the service life, or the increase in the rank establishment of "four into three", is not impossible, on the one hand, it is not impossible to relax the ratio of the fourth-level sergeant major to the third-level sergeant major, on the other hand, to extend the service life of the fourth-level sergeant major, corresponding to the monthly service life of the non-commissioned officer, so that under the premise of maximization, while solving the problem of most non-commissioned officers to meet the job change, it is also good to take "double selection" month by month.
The third category, college sergeants (directly recruited sergeants). The biggest focus of contradiction is the current situation that college students are not placed for enough years, and in the future, there may be three trends in the policy of resettlement of college students and noncommissioned officers: the first trend is that the placement is based on the rank of rank, focusing on military ranks, that is to say, college students serving the rank of active sergeant can be arranged to work; the second trend, the placement of college students and non-commissioned officers, to separately list a "Provisional Regulations" involving college students and non-commissioned officers; the third trend, to meet a certain number of years of service, for college students and non-commissioned officers targeted recruitment of civil servants. Recruitment is open to veterans who have served for more than five years and meet the requirements for the recruitment of national civil servants.
Receive retirement payments on a monthly basis
Receiving retirement payments on a monthly basis is the most critical placement.
Involving the monthly retirement pension of officers and non-commissioned officers, the main news at present can be considered:
First, in terms of the scope of conditions, the monthly retirement pension only requires the officer to complete 16 years (or serve as a non-commissioned officer and officer for a total of 16 years), and the second is that the monthly retirement pension is mainly set according to the service life and the actual performance contribution ladder, the longer the service life, the higher the standard of calculation and issuance.
In addition, the rumors that involve receiving retirement pensions month by month, such as "the structure of basic retirement pension + additional issuance of retirement funds", "based on pension insurance funds", "16 years of non-commissioned officers month by month", "fourth-level sergeant majors extend their service life against the benchmark month by month", etc., need to be further clarified by relevant supporting policies.
In the provisions of the "Veterans Protection Law", involving officers or non-commissioned officers receiving retirement pensions on a monthly basis, the content only stays in "receiving retirement pensions month by month in accordance with the relevant provisions of the state", and there are two points that can be speculated: first, the monthly "basket" standard will be clarified in the "Regulations on the Resettlement of Retired Soldiers"; second, a "Notice" similar to the previous "No. 1 document" on the management measures for receiving retirement pensions on a monthly basis will be issued.
Again, when it comes to audiences that are likely to be month-by-month:
First of all, for the sergeant, according to the current service period of 16 years, the third-level sergeant major or above can be month by month; as for the fourth-level sergeant major month by month, it is nothing more than an extension of service, and the second is to increase the number of promotions to third-level sergeant majors.
Speaking of officers, before there were independent "service years of more than 18 years", basically the audience group was above the deputy regiment, and the current officers had a dry age of 16 years, in accordance with the orientation of "majors can be month by month, lieutenant colonels can retire", for the month-by-month group, one is over-aged lieutenant officers, and the other is that in accordance with the previous "Active Officers Law" Major has served at least 14 years, the new twelve policies for officers, the minimum promotion period for officers has been clarified, the major has extended the length of service, and the conditions for meeting the 16-year dry age have basically been met.
Demobilization vs. self-employment
The demobilization of officers and the self-employment of non-commissioned officers can be grouped into one category, which can be understood as "buyout" and taking money to leave, which is also the least difficult factor in retirement placement.
Of course, when it comes to the "6 + 3" voluntary retirement model of officer demobilization in 2021, whether the proportion of abnormal demobilization will be liberalized as everyone says, and various statements are different depending on the specific overall planning of officers' career transfer this year. In addition, it involves the appeal of some military officers to whether the proportion of civil servants can be relaxed after demobilization, which may be the idea of some people.
In addition, relatively speaking, the 16 years of non-commissioned service also has a certain proportion in the choice of self-employment, and everyone's focus may be on a one-time retirement pension, which is more affordable, but it is inevitable to face the economic pressure of employment after retiring from the military for 16 years.
The above content is for your reference only.