Recently, the village cadres of Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Town, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, the deputy secretary of the Party Committee of Jianhua Town, and the local police station to prevent local grain growers from farming were reported by China's agriculture, agriculture, and rural areas, which quickly attracted widespread attention and heated discussions on the whole network.
Latest development: The county government issued a "circular"
After paying attention to the news spread on the Internet, the Kailu County Party Committee and the county government also attached great importance to it, and immediately organized relevant meetings and set up an investigation working group, and the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision also intervened in the investigation. Just now, the Information Office of the People's Government of Kailu County issued a "Circular" to respond to the hot issues that people are concerned about:
On the issue of "strange supplementary contracting fees". Kailu County, as a pilot unit for the efficient use of new cultivated land determined by the superiors, has carried out a pilot project for the efficient use of cultivated land newly increased by the "third land adjustment" compared with the "second land adjustment". "Supplementary contracting fee" is one of the disposal methods adopted in the pilot work of efficient utilization of new cultivated land in Kailu County, that is, the paid use fee charged by the village collective for the new cultivated land.
On the issue of "blocking farming". During the implementation of the pilot project in Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Town, some large farmers of newly added cultivated land were unwilling to pay fees, which led to the psychology of comparison among farmers who had already paid fees, which led to the behavior of hindering land ploughing. At present, through the coordination and resolution of the county, town and village levels, the people of the village have agreed to take the form of litigation to claim their rights and interests, resolve contradictions, and ensure that there are no more behaviors that hinder land ploughing and land preparation, delay agricultural time, etc.
On the issue of the arrogant attitude and rude language of individual grassroots cadres towards the masses. In view of the problems reflected in the report that individual grassroots cadres have an arrogant attitude towards the masses, rude language, and serious improper work methods, the Kailu County Party Committee has dismissed the deputy secretary of the town's party committee, and the county Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has given him an intra-party warning. The county Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision gave the secretary of the village party branch and the deputy director of the village committee serious warnings respectively. Investigations into possible other disciplinary violations are also ongoing.
In response to the "Information Circular" of the Information Office of the People's Government of Kailu County, there are several doubts:
Where did the new arable land come from?
After the grain growers were contracted, they invested a large amount of manpower, material, and financial resources to dig wells, irrigate, and fertilize the grasslands and tidal flats into irrigated cultivated land; during the three adjustments of the national land, the attributes of the land were changed from "grassland" and "tidal flats" to "cultivated land"; should the change in the attributes of the land not be attributed in part to the hard work of the land contractors, the grain growers, and the transformation of the funds invested? Think about it, if there is no transformation of the growers, how can there be planting conditions for the former grassland and tidal flat land when the land is adjusted to the third level? How can the land attribute be changed from grassland and tidal flat land to cultivated land?
Is it reasonable and reasonable for land contractors to work hard to transform grassland and tidal flats into cultivated land, and the local government will charge a "supplementary contract fee" without rewarding them?
It can be seen from the "Circular" of the Information Office of the local county people's government that Kailu County, as a pilot unit for the efficient use of new land, has adopted the "supplementary contract fee" as a disposal method for the pilot work, and the paid use fee collected by the village collective on the newly added cultivated land.
One issue that needs to be noted here is that the land referred to in the "Land Contract Agreement" signed between the contractor and the local village committee is the land that the grain grower is currently contracting, and the contract period has not expired so far. Then, regardless of the nature of the land, and regardless of whether it is the second or third adjustment of the land, the right to contract and operate the land still belongs to the contractor during the contract period.
The change in the land attribute is caused by the local government when confirming the land attribute, rather than the actual new cultivated land that the government has invested in manpower, material and financial resources to transform.
We ordinary people have not studied the legal things in depth, and we don't understand them very much, but from a reasonable point of view, they are "unreasonable" and "unreasonable".
This is equivalent to Zhang San renting Li Si's house and saying that he would rent it for ten years. Because Zhang San lived in a long-term rental, he spent money to renovate the house. As soon as Li Si saw that the house was renovated, he thought about renting it at a high price, so he said to Zhang San, "The house will not be rented to you." If you want to continue renting, you'll have to pay an extra 200 dollars a month!"
It is obviously the town cadres and village cadres who are blocking the farmland, so why are the farmers who have paid the fees in the "Situation Circular"?
From the video reported by the release of China's agriculture, we can all see that it is the local village party secretary, village director, deputy secretary of the town party committee, and people from the police station who are not allowed to cultivate in front of the agricultural machinery of grain growers.
This is the case, the news reports are there, the videos are there, who blocked them, and the people of the whole country can see it clearly, so why can't the local cadres understand it? Is it "talking nonsense with their eyes open"?
Dismissal and warning! Why is it that when something goes wrong, it is always the village cadres who bear the responsibility?
It is an indisputable fact that in the course of handling this matter, the deputy secretary of the Jianhua Town Party Committee took an arrogant attitude and acted rudely! It is also reasonable and expected to deal with him in a certain degree of organization. The village party secretary and deputy director of the village committee of Shuangsheng Village also had improper working methods and arrogant treatment of the masses during the entire incident, and they deserved to be punished accordingly.
However, if the county party committee and the county government had been able to fully listen to the opinions and suggestions of the local people when formulating policies, really go deep into the peasant households to listen to the voices of the peasant households, and respect the wishes of the peasants, would there have been no such methods as collecting "supplementary contract fees" for the handling of the pilot work of the efficient use of new cultivated land? Without such a policy, would the deputy secretary of the party committee, the village party secretary of Shuangsheng Village, and the deputy director of the village committee of Jianhua Town not have adopted such an extreme method to clash with the grain growers? Punished?
Obviously, it is a policy formulated by the county party committee and the county government that is not in line with reality, and it is up to the grassroots township and town people's governments and village committees to implement it, but when something goes wrong, the township and town cadres and village cadres are the first to be held accountable.
The root cause of the problem obviously lies with the superiors, and the township and town cadres and village cadres should be held accountable except for the problems! Really, I don't know what to say!
What do you think of this "circular" issued by the Information Office of the Kailu County People's Government? Welcome to share your high views.