Recently, according to a report released by China's agriculture, agriculture and agriculture, in Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, after seeing the valley rain solar term, the local grain farmers are looking at the thousands of acres of land contracted by themselves can not be cultivated, once the land is cultivated, the local village cadres lie in front of the agricultural machinery and do not give way, the town cadres will "detain the car" at every turn, and the police station will drag people to the police car, why?
Overview of the event
In Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Town, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, a large local grain grower signed a land contract with the village committee more than ten years ago, and the village committee contracted thousands of acres of land that originally belonged to grassland and tidal flats to farmers. Through continuous investment and improvement in recent decades, farmers have dug wells, applied fertilizer, and irrigated to improve these thousands of acres of land into irrigated land and planted corn.
But at the beginning of this year, seeing that the Guyu solar term had passed, the growers wanted to go to the field to cultivate, but the local village director and village party secretary blocked the agricultural machinery and did not allow the growers to grow grain.
At the township level, the deputy secretary of the Jianhua Town Party Committee threatened that "he does not understand the law!" However, he led people to block the farmers and prevent them from going to the fields to cultivate, and they also wanted to detain the agricultural machinery of the farmers, indicating that the land contracted by the farmers no longer belonged to the growers, but to the village collectives.
The mayor of Jianhua Town said that it was the matter of the Shuangsheng Village Committee that the Shuangsheng Village Committee did not allow grain growers to continue to cultivate the land, and that the town government did not say that it would not allow grain growers to continue cultivating the land. At the same time, he also said that he knows some law himself, according to the Civil Code......
When the local police station arrived at the scene and listened to the grain grower's explanation, the first order it gave was to "detain the agricultural machinery used to work in the field"! The second thing it did was to "snatch the mobile phone of the filming personnel"! The third thing it said was "the public security organ verbally summoned you"! The fourth thing it did was "several people planned to forcibly 'arrest' a grain farmer (woman) into a police car."
As soon as the incident was reported, it attracted great attention and heated discussions among netizens
With these cadres who do not understand the law, they should be eliminated from the cadre ranks!
A secretary said that if the villagers were detained, the police at the police station would arrest them, what a big man, what a big official!
What's the difference between this and the underworld?
It's time for the mayor of the town and the police station to get out of class, and they must be thoroughly investigated and held accountable!
How can such a person become a deputy secretary?
The post of deputy secretary of the party committee is no longer guaranteed, wait and see!
He doesn't even understand the basic laws, how can he become a secretary??
Crack down on the corrupt bureaucrats at the local grassroots level who harm the common people!
Is it just that the village chief is a hooligan, and the secretary of the town party committee and the director of the police station are all legally illiterate? How did they take office? The people who promoted them must also be strictly investigated and dealt with!
In the words, there is anger in it!
Fourth, ask the local village cadres, the town government and the police station
Why do the "contracts" and "agreements" written in black and white look like a piece of waste paper in your eyes?
The village director does not understand the law, which is understandable, after all, he is elected by the villagers, or limited by his academic qualifications, or limited by his busy daily work, and there is also a saying. As the "third-in-command" of the first-level government, the deputy secretary of the party committee, who looks young, is in his thirties, saying that he himself does not understand the law, and he is saying that he is so "taken for granted", I really don't know where he got the courage?
Moreover, even if you don't understand the law, then you always know the words, right? The "contract" and "agreement" written in black and white, the term of the land contract is written there, the rights and obligations of both parties are also written there, and the red official seal is stamped there, and you all pretend not to know each other!
The village director said that the above regulations did not allow planting, but the town mayor said that the town government did not ask for it, but the deputy secretary of the town party committee led people to stop the planting! Who is the village director talking about? Is the deputy secretary of the town party committee a cadre of the town government?
In the video, the director of Shuangsheng Village said sentence by sentence, "There are regulations at the top that do not allow planting", and when it comes to the mayor of Jianhua Town, it becomes "the town government does not require that the planting be planted, it is a problem in the village", so may I ask, where is the upper level of the village director's mouth? Where is the upper level of the village level?
In addition, the mayor of the town has said that the town government has no requirements on whether the land contracted by the growers in Shuangsheng Village can be cultivated, so as the "third-in-command" of the town government, which town cadre is the deputy secretary of the party committee? Does what he do represent himself or the town government? Why does he demand that the land contractors in Shuangsheng Village not cultivate the land they have contracted?
As the people's public security, who is the police station talking for? Who is it supporting the people? The law is still some people?
In accordance with the state's laws and regulations on public security administration, police stations are responsible for public order management in complex public places and important areas, special industries, dangerous goods and contraband for civilian use, household registration and resident identity cards, and in accordance with national laws and regulations on public security administration.
As a people's public security officer, serving the people is its main duty; after arriving at the scene, after listening to the land contractor's justified and well-founded account, without conducting an in-depth investigation into the matter, they will let "the agricultural machinery for farming be detained"; they will snatch other people's mobile phones without regard for the people's right to supervise; they will casually verbally summon others without any good reason; and they will forcibly arrest people before they have understood the matter?
I really don't understand, the people's policemen at the grassroots police stations, are you the people's public security? Or are you the public security of "certain people"? Are you the enforcers of the law, or are you the "thugs" of "certain people"?
In the end, is it the rule of law or the "rule of man"? Why can't we "seek truth from facts" in formulating and implementing policies? Why should we implement the so-called policies formulated by managers at the expense of the people's interests?
Since the attributes of the land contracted by farmers have changed after the three land adjustments in 2018, from grassland and tidal flat land to cultivated land, in this process, it is inseparable from the long-term investment of the original grassland and tidal flat contractors in the land resources, material resources, and manpower.
Since the nature of the land has changed, why can't the two sides sit down and discuss and resolve some matters such as land contracting? It has been six years since the third land adjustment in 2018, so why couldn't we have discussed with the land contractor earlier about the relevant matters of land recontracting? Instead of delaying it until now? It has to be resolved until the time when "the seeds will go to the ground and the farmers will grow grain"?
At a time when more and more attention is being paid to food security from top to bottom, especially this year is the first year of increasing grain yields proposed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the local government attaches great importance to the efficiency of land planting, and this is a good thing for the benefit of the people and the country, but why does it have to sacrifice the interests of the common people when formulating policies? Where is the credibility of the government when the first-level government does this? Who will dare to contract land in such a government jurisdiction in the future? What is the difference between such a practice and a "scoundrel"?
Fortunately, after the incident was reported, it immediately attracted the attention of the Kailu County Party Committee and the county government, and a working group was set up to investigate, and the local Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has also paid attention to the matter and is verifying whether the village and town cadres involved have violated the law and discipline.
What do you think about this?