I believe everyone has watched the video about this incident, and as far as the clues that have appeared now, not to mention the problem of cultivated land, the domineering behavior of the local town government is outrageous, and the local police station's acting for the tiger is even more shocking.
Loading...
"I don't understand the law either," Ji Yunhao, a member of the political and legal committee.
"If you are used to it, I will arrest you when I become a policeman" Kailu police.
said that he didn't understand the law, and what he did seemed to be in his hands in the whole of Inner Mongolia.
When attracting people to invest, they made various promises, signed a 30-year contract, and when they invested millions for more than ten years, the land became irrigated, and there was no basis for saying that the contract was invalid and should be recovered. The naked act of killing chickens and retrieving eggs.
Source: Beijing time
The No. 1 document of the Central Committee clearly explains: "Promote the use of abandoned land in accordance with local conditions, and use the multi-purpose planting of rural collective economic organizations to support the support of uncultivated land." ”
In this case, the land contracted by the villagers was previously a barren swamp meadow, but after being improved by the contractor, it has become irrigated land. This is one of the best examples of this policy, and if the local officials have a little political understanding and more support, it is a very good achievement.
As a result, it has now become a negative case, laughing and generous.
What is the purpose of making such a big deal out of it for the sake of political achievements? Unless driven by greater interests.
Jianhua Town has as much as 400,000 mu of land for the additional contract fee, and according to the standard of 200 yuan per mu, the cost is close to hundreds of millions.
Loading...
This piece of meat is indeed much fatter than the average political achievement.
Anyone who understands understands it!
The common people want to be reasonable, but they don't reason with you; the common people want to explain the Fa, but they say they don't understand the Fa. They are justified both horizontally and vertically, and the common people can only admit it. Ridiculous and pathetic.
Now let's talk about arable land.
There is one important clue that does not appear, and that is the contract. So, the focus of the discussion now is on government bullying.
If the nature of the land is grassland at the time of the contract, and the contract does not clearly state how to deal with the subsequent change in the nature of the land, it will be difficult for farmers to protect their rights.
The nature of the land is grassland, and the contract can only be planted and cut after 30 years. The grassland has been turned into irrigated land and planting land, which is a change in the nature of the land.
Today you can turn grassland into planting land, tomorrow someone will turn planting land into commercial land, industrial land, 1.8 billion acres of land red line, and it may be eroded little by little.
Therefore, the opening of changing the nature of the land is very strict, and the examination and approval is carried out at various levels, and the approval is basically not down.
Satellites, drones, take pictures and detect several times a day, drive a tractor to turn over the ground, and as soon as the terrain changes, it can be found immediately.