On April 20, Iranian Foreign Minister Abdollahian attended a meeting of the United Nations Security Council in New York, and when he went to the venue, a reporter asked him, "Did you know in advance about the Israeli attack on Iran?"
Abdollahian ignored it, but his assistant replied lightly: "What attack?"
Why is this reply? Are they really not paying attention to Israel's counterattack?
Of course not, according to Abdollahian, what happened in Iran was not an attack at all, and the flight of several small "children's drones" did not require prior notice.
Contempt and ridicule, this is the official attitude adopted by Iran towards Israel's so-called "counterattack".
Some people say that Iran is hard-mouthed, but in fact, even the Israelis feel ashamed to see this counterattack against Iran.
In the aftermath of the attack, Itama Ben-Gvir, Israel's Minister of National Security and a representative of the far-right, expressed his opinion in just one word: "Weak!"
Although Iran's counterattack on Israel is also more politically significant, and has not caused much damage to Israel, it has also launched more than 300 missiles and drones, and everyone can see that there are indeed missiles that hit the target, but what about Israel?
So far, only the wreckage of a suspected Israeli ballistic missile found in Iraq can prove that Israel did carry out a counterattack, but this wreckage is also very problematic, because it seems to be the target missile used by Israel to test the "Arrow" anti-missile system, the Blue Sparrow ballistic missile, which was used to counterattack with a target missile, and the wreckage was also dropped in Iraq, which shows that Israel either seriously lacks long-range strike means or has not acted at all.
As for the evidence in Iran, it is even less pitiful, not to mention the wreckage of the missile, except for the video of the air defense system firing is real, what other videos and photos of "missiles hitting targets" and "sounding explosions in various parts of Iran" are fake, and the accompanying pictures used by the "Jerusalem Post" that first reported this time were even picked up as photos of the Israeli army's bombing of Gaza two years ago.
In addition, according to satellite images released by the US media, the so-called Israeli counterattack did not cause any identifiable damage to the air base in the northeast of Iran's Isfahan province, and according to the Iranian media, Israel's "counterattack" only shattered a few pieces of glass.
So where exactly did the Israeli missiles hit?
At present, all kinds of evidence show that Israel did not launch long-range strikes against Iran at all, but only used Israel's spy network in Iran to fly a few small quadcopter drones on Isfahan soil, which are indeed not much of a threat compared to military suicide drones, and it is no wonder that Iran's foreign minister called them "small toy drones".
In fact, if you have to strictly say it, Israel's counterattack on Iran is not an "attack" at all, at most it is a "disturbance of social order", so Iran does not take it to heart at all, usually ignores it, and if someone has to ask, then ridicule a few words.
But the far-right elements in Israel cannot ignore this outcome.
Netanyahu was able to come to power because of the support of right-wing and far-right parties, and they did not buy this level of counterattack at all.
So now Neta is facing a dilemma, if it stops, its position may not be secured, and if it is reorganized to counterattack, then the conflict will expand, and the last thing the United States wants to see will appear. How will Netanyahu choose at this time?
Personally, he believes that he will either carry out real retaliation against Iran, or turn his attention to Rafah and launch a ground invasion against Rafah, all in all, the war cannot be stopped.