Recently, the topic of whether the lower berth of the train is a public area has rushed to the hot search and has become a topic of discussion after dinner. This stems from a video taken by an old man.
Loading...
In the video, an old man in his 70s, while taking the video, angrily yelled at this young man, sitting on a sleeper and hanging a curtain, and the old man in his 70s was not allowed to sit.
After the video was uploaded to the Internet, a debate about "whether the lower berth of the train is a public area" was launched on the Internet, and some netizens believed that people bought tickets for this sleeper, and they had the right to use this location, so that it was the right of people not to let you sit, and there was no need to rely on the old and sell the old.
Some netizens think that these two young men really don't know how to respect the old and love the young, and besides, the lower bunk is a public area, and anyone can sit.
Soon the 12306 official also noticed this video, and soon said that whoever bought the ticket, the ownership is who's, let you not let you sit, you have to ask the owner of the ticket. So it's a good explanation that the lower bunk is not a public area.
Then someone came out to question it, what's wrong with you as a young man letting the old man sit, look at the old man's anger. The young man in question finally couldn't sit still anymore and responded to the question.
The person concerned said that there was no refusal to communicate at all, it was they who refused to communicate from the beginning, and then scolded people directly, and said, young people, don't be so selfish.
The party also posted that the entire space was not occupied at that time, except for the three elderly people who relied on the old and sold the old, everyone else was very good.
Finally, some experts couldn't sit still and spoke up, encouraging young people who bought lower bunks to change places for older people. Netizen: What a bad idea.
Some netizens claimed that even if the young man concerned did not stand up and explain, anyone who was a little sensible would know what was going on. It's love to let you sit, and it's duty not to let you sit.
Some netizens said that this time I am completely on the side of young people, and it is not who posts the video who is justified.
At last
If the old man communicates well with the young man, it will definitely be a different result, but he chooses to rely on the old and sell the old, and wants to get sympathy by posting videos, so he can only say that he lifted a stone and shot himself in the foot.
Friends, what do you think about this matter?