The nanny was squatting in the kitchen secretly eating abalone and was discovered by the hostess. The hostess asked the nanny in a stern tone: "Do you know how much abalone you eat? This one is worth 500 yuan, is this what you can eat? In the future, we can throw away our family's valuable things, but you can't eat them!"
Here's a video I swiped out of a hostess who had a treat at her house and asked the nanny to prepare a meal, one of which was steamed abalone.
The hostess stipulates one per person, and when the guests have one abalone left after the meal, the hostess asks the nanny to throw it away.
The nanny had never eaten such a big abalone, and she was distressed to see such a valuable food thrown away, but she didn't dare to eat it that day, but hid the abalone.
The next day, she squatted on the floor in the kitchen and secretly ate this abalone, because she had never eaten such a big and good abalone, she slowly tasted it.
At this moment, the hostess suddenly appeared, and she saw at a glance that the nanny was stealing abalone.
The hostess was very angry, and said in a stern tone: "What are you doing here, do you know how much abalone you eat, this one is worth 500 yuan, can you afford it?"
The nanny was stunned when she heard this: "Ah, 500 yuan, so expensive?"
The nanny was very aggrieved: "This is what you asked you to throw away yesterday, I didn't want to leave it, and I haven't eaten it usually." ”
The nanny looked at the hostess's serious expression and felt that this matter was not so simple, so she had to say, "Why don't I transfer you 500 yuan?"
The hostess did not ask the nanny to transfer money to her, but said something like this: "In the future, we can throw away our family's valuables, but you can't eat them!"
The video is here, not to mention how the nanny felt when she heard her employer's words, netizens in the comment area exploded directly!
Some netizens are angry: Such a valuable ingredient would rather be thrown away than given to the nanny, this is too bullying, isn't the nanny worthy of respect?
In fact, this netizen is just angry, but his rhetoric is wrong, any job deserves to be respected, but this has little to do with respect or disrespect.
Some netizens said: It's great to have two stinky money, a proper rich man's face, be benevolent and righteous, and be good to the nanny, since it's not better not to get something to give to the nanny, why do you want to do things so desperately?
A netizen has had an experience, he thinks: Don't think that if the employer is good to the nanny, you can get her better service. The nanny industry is mixed, and if you treat her well to a nanny, she will have to make inches, because the interests of both parties are opposite, and sometimes it is not the employer who wants to be a good person to do!
I have always had a nanny at home to take care of the elderly, the first nanny in the family, started to do very well, I read her hard work, as long as I am at home, I will work more to let her rest.
Later, as soon as I came home, she stopped doing all the work at home, ran to her room to sleep in the daytime, left all the work to me, saw that I was easy to talk, and used my thousands of dollars of cosmetics every day, and decisively dismissed her.
In my opinion, the nanny is an employee who I pay a salary, she is not my family, she can be good to the nanny, but you must first explain the rules and have a sense of boundaries, otherwise it will be difficult to get along.
For example, if you buy more expensive ingredients at home, sea cucumbers, ginseng, and protein powder for the elderly, you can only enjoy them for your own family, and it is impossible to buy one for the nanny.
Although the live-in nanny stipulates that food and accommodation are included, let's talk about the problem of housing first:
First of all, no matter how many rooms there are in the family, the nanny can't live in the master bedroom, but has to live in a special nanny room, or a utility room.
In other words, the employer should ensure that the room of the employee has basic living facilities.
Let's talk about the problem of package food: ordinary people don't pay much attention to it, they generally eat what they cook, and the nanny and the host's family eat at the same table.
However, the waiters hired by wealthy families have strict rules that do not allow nannies to eat at the same table as their hosts. Most nannies can only eat in the kitchen, but there are also separate tables for babysitters.
To be precise, the package of food and accommodation is to ensure the basic living standard of the nanny, rather than to guarantee you to eat delicacies from the mountains and seas and imported fruits.
And a quality nanny will naturally recognize her identity without the rules set by her employer. They have their own opinions, they don't eat what they can't eat, they don't move what they can't move, and they don't say what they can't say.
For employers, nannies should have double pay for holiday work, and employers have to prepare meals for many people when they come to their homes, or if they work more, the employer will give red envelopes if they have a good idea. Both parties are clear about their responsibilities, so that both parties are not tired of getting along.
As a nanny who serves the employer, you must understand that you are here to earn money, and everything else is secondary, and you can eat and buy whatever you want when you earn money.
Let's talk about the question of why the hostess in the video threw away the extra abalone and didn't let the nanny eat it.
Do you think that the female employer is really a black-hearted wicked person? In fact, this is the wisdom of the hostess.
The employer treats guests at home and asks the nanny to steam abalone according to the number of people, one per person, so why is there an extra one?
If you think about it, you can understand that although the nanny is not highly educated, she has her own thinking logic in doing things, and it seems that she is loyal and honest, but in fact, she hides her own careful thoughts.
It turned out that the nanny saw such a good abalone, she had never eaten it before, and she definitely wanted to eat it, but she didn't dare to tell the master, so she came to cut it first and then play.
When steaming the abalone, she steamed an extra one, she thought that the abalone was already steamed anyway, and the owner of such a good thing would definitely not throw it away, so the extra one would go to the nanny to eat.
But the hostess is a highly intelligent person, and she has already seen through this little trick of the nanny.
That's why she told the nanny to throw away the rest of the abalone.
In fact, the employer did not expose it on the spot, and it was already saving face for the nanny.
Obviously, the nanny's IQ is still a little worse than that of the hostess.
She secretly hid the abalone and ate it in the kitchen the next day, but she was afraid that the hostess would find out, so she had to squat on the ground, but she didn't know that the hostess had already found out.
The reason why the employer is so desperate to chase this abalone is not what netizens think, the hostess is very picky and unkind to the rich.
The reason why the employer did this was because she felt that there were no rules, and she wanted to take this opportunity to set rules for the nanny.
Because there are too many things of value in the rich people's homes, not only food, but also other valuable things, to prevent such things from happening again in the future.
So when the nanny was eating with relish, the hostess appeared at the right time and dealt with the matter conclusively.
The result is: we can throw away our precious ingredients, but you can't eat them.
Many netizens will be angry after watching this video, and they have accused the female employer: The rich man's face is really ugly, this is disrespectful to the nanny's personality, I would have stopped doing it a long time ago!
In fact, as a nanny, the purpose of serving the employer is to make money, and the two parties are in an employment relationship, and their identities are different.
On the other hand, if the employer deliberately underpays the nanny, the nanny will definitely fight for her own interests.
If, as netizens said, the nanny quits her job because of psychological imbalance, the loss must be the nanny.
If you don't do it, others will do it, there are many people who want to do this job and earn this money, are you afraid that you won't find someone to do things if you have money?
If the nanny can calm down and clarify her identity, her heart will naturally be balanced. Of course, this is not to say that nannies are inferior, but the nature of work and identity are different.
If you feel unbalanced, you can earn more money, and you can also hire others to serve you in the future.
In short, to be a nanny, you must first put yourself in the right position, and your mentality is very important.
What do you think about employers preferring to throw away the abalone rather than give it to the babysitter?
(Author's statement: This article is the original debut of @Xin's Time Inn Headlines, and the whole network has been opened to protect rights, and the handling must be investigated!) Personal views are for reference only!