Recently, the report of anti-counterfeiters Wang Hai and Liu Jiang on Dongfang's selection of prawns has sparked heated discussions on the Internet, and the Food Safety China account has also forwarded Liu Jiang's report.
On the one hand, there is a heated discussion on the Internet, and on the other hand, the capital market is falling and falling, and Dongfang Selection finally can't sit still.
On April 15, Dongfang Selection issued a notice, with the title naming Dongfang Selection for malicious slander against the prawn incident, in which Dongfang Selection replied strongly to the prawn issue and named that legal measures would be taken.
Dongfang Selection's reply mainly focuses on the following two points:
1. The original products are imported and can only enter the country after random inspection. Moreover, he has also passed many random inspections.
2. From February to March this year, the regulatory authorities have conducted no less than 10 random sampling inspections for the selection of prawns in the East, and the feedback results are all qualified.
However, Dongfang Selection's reply did not explain why sodium metabisulfite was not indicated in the ingredient list of its prawns. Now Dongfang Selection's reply only states that the test results are qualified, but does not indicate that it does not contain sulfur dioxide. In the statement of Dongfang Selection, "in line with national standards" and "no sulfur dioxide exceeding the standard was found" were used. Without stating whether it contains sulfur dioxide or not, is there a deliberate concealment of this move?
Many netizens said that Dongfang Selection finally couldn't sit still and began to respond. But I hope that there will be a beginning and an end, and I must send out the lawyer's letter and wait for the two sides to meet in court.
Some netizens said that the last time Dongfang Selection said that he had called the police, why was there no follow-up, is it a loss?
Some netizens said that Liu Jiang used the test report to talk about the problem, and your statement was all about talking with your mouth, and there was no evidence at all, it was all qualified as you said, what about the evidence?
Therefore, no matter what, there is a lot of bad news about Dongfang Selection recently. If you want to respond with strength, you must come up with evidence, and publish the details of the tests that were tested by those institutions, and what the test results are. Then the people will surely believe your words.
If Dongfang Selection's response is still so empty and unsubstantiated, how can you make others believe it? Moreover, isn't it more convincing than yours that other people's test reports are also made public in their hands?
Consumer complaints and reports must be faced, and the evidence must be solid, otherwise it will only make others laugh.