laitimes

Israel-Iran's tacit warfare: point-to-point attacks

Yesterday night, Iran launched its first direct attack on the Israeli mainland.

According to Israel's official statistics, Iran launched a total of 330+ drones and missiles, more than 320 were destroyed, and several fell into non-important areas.

Among them, more than 70 planes were shot down by the United States, Britain, France, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the rest were destroyed by Israeli forces, with a success rate of 99 percent.

Israel-Iran's tacit warfare: point-to-point attacks

The attack, which took place two weeks after the decapitation of Iranian generals on April 1, was well prepared and large-scale, and Israel's high rate of interception showed that its air defense capabilities were not in vain.

It is worth mentioning that the Israeli Arrow missile made its debut in combat during this attack, intercepting cruise missiles in the outer atmosphere.

Here is a strange "celestial phenomenon" that was spotted in northern Israel at the time of the Iranian missile strike last night:

Israel-Iran's tacit warfare: point-to-point attacks

Some military enthusiasts explained that because there is almost no air outside the atmosphere, after the missile is destroyed, the explosive gases are quickly diluted and cooled, which is obviously different from the brilliant and bright scene after the explosion in the atmosphere.

It is also worth mentioning that the United States accurately estimated the timing of Iran's attack.

On April 11, the United States announced that Iran would attack Israel within 48 hours. Later, ABC News, citing a senior U.S. official, reported that the U.S. believes Iran could launch a total of about 400 to 500 drones and missiles into Israel from Iraq, Syria, southern Lebanon and Houthi bases.

This estimate is very close to the actual situation, and the intelligence capabilities of the US imperialists really have nothing to say.

Overall, the Iranian attack gave the impression of thunder and rain, and the damage caused to Israel was very small, and, almost at the beginning of the attack, while the drones/missiles were still on their way to Israel, the Iranian mission to the United Nations posted on social media claiming that the attack was revenge for Israel's attack on its Syrian embassy and the assassination of senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials earlier this month, and that revenge can now be considered "over".

In other words, it doesn't matter what the outcome is, I've already fought back anyway, and it's completely like I'm at peace with things - note that the "rest" here is a domestic thing, and the "Ning" is also a domestic person.

In a sense, the current Khamenei is the one who stepped on the tightrope, and it is not okay not to retaliate, and it is not okay to retaliate for a good or bad thing.

"No retaliation" is easy to understand, the embassy was "violated" and senior generals were beheaded, if they don't fight back, how can they maintain the image of anti-US and anti-Israel fighters?

As for the "results of the war," there is a term called "local area network." The Iranian people, under the leadership of Khamenei, have taught the Jewish infidels a hard lesson, marching from victory to victory, and anyone who disagrees with this conclusion is an "Iraqi traitor"...

It's easy to understand if the counterattack is ruthless, if Israel is provoked, it really wants to fight, Iran, which has no air defense, will only be beaten, and in the end, all the gods are in danger of collapsing - Israel's counterattack has not yet come, and the leaders of the Iranian opposition parties are already condemning Iran for launching a war against Israel and calling for a popular uprising...

On the other hand, since Iran's attack was obviously a showmanship and had no real consequences, Israel's retaliation should not be too drastic – and it is expected that the US imperialists will persuade them to stop at it.

The so-called "all-out war between Iran and Israel" is just eye-catching hype.

By the way, some friends always like to talk about "the last battle between XX and XX", and I don't think so.

If a place wants to be reborn, internal factors are the key, and the lessons of US imperialism in Afghanistan are deep enough, I don't think they have the idea of changing the world through hot war.

Wash and sleep!

Text/West Building Drinking Moon

If you want to give, please click on the '...' in the top right corner to appreciate, thank you for your support!

Israel-Iran's tacit warfare: point-to-point attacks

Read on