Hello!Hello everyone!Welcome to Kankan Old Money Base!Focus on old money, gossip and turn over!Brain holes, novelty jumping! Jumping up!
Mr. Guo Songmin's criticism of Hu Xijin obviously has a strong emotional color. He directly blasted Hu Xijin as "uneducated" and accused his remarks of "nonsense". Mr. Guo's criticism mainly focused on Hu Xijin's possible vague understanding and misleading remarks on the ethnic issue.
Please enjoy the video below
Loading...
Guo Songmin pointed out that Hu Xijin not only did not have a clear understanding of certain issues himself, but also tried to use this unclear understanding to influence others, that is, "to make others clear by his own faintness." What is more serious is that Guo Songmin believes that Hu Xijin deliberately creates ethnic contradictions, which is an extremely irresponsible behavior.
Guo Songmin stressed: The Chinese nation is a big family composed of 56 nationalities. Although these ethnic groups have different cultures, histories and customs, they all belong to the land of China and are all Chinese. For example, Mongolians, Russians, Koreans, Uygurs, Uzbeks, etc., although not all of them are from Yanhuang, their culture, traditions and customs have become an important part of the pluralistic unity of the Chinese nation.
Guo Songmin further pointed out that what can truly unite the common identity of the 56 ethnic groups is Chairman Mao Zedong's thought, the national philosophy of the People's Republic of China, and the socialist system. These are the common beliefs and pursuits of our nation, while other factors, such as blood and culture, are important but not decisive.
The purpose of Guo Songmin's critical article is to remind the public that we should have a clear understanding and a correct attitude toward the national issue, and should not be misled by some irresponsible remarks. At the same time, he also hoped that Hu Xijin would reflect on his remarks and avoid creating unnecessary controversies and contradictions again.
Netizen comments about Guo Songmin's bombardment of Hu Xijin show a trend of diversification and polarization. Here are some possible netizen comments:
Support Guo Songmin's views:
Some netizens believe that Guo Songmin, as an independent news commentator and scholar, is criticized out of concern for ethnic issues and national reunification. They agreed with Guo Songmin's view that the Chinese nation is composed of 56 ethnic groups, and believed that Hu Xijin's remarks may indeed be misleading and may even create ethnic contradictions. These netizens may call on Hu Xijin to be more cautious in handling remarks involving ethnic issues, so as not to have a negative impact on society.
Against Guo Songmin's point of view:
Other netizens may have the opposite opinion, arguing that Mr. Guo's criticism was too harsh and even personal. They believe that Hu Xijin, as a media person, has the right to express his views, even if those views may not be entirely correct. These netizens may point out that freedom of expression is an important cornerstone of social progress and should not be suppressed because certain statements may cause controversy.
Neutral or wait-and-see attitude:
There are also some netizens who may be neutral or wait-and-see. They believe that Guo Songmin and Hu Xijin are both public figures, and their remarks will naturally arouse attention and discussion. For these netizens, they are more concerned about whether the two sides can clarify their views through dialogue and debate, rather than just staying at the level of mutual accusations.
There are doubts about both sides:
In addition, some netizens may question Guo Songmin and Hu Xijin at the same time. They believe that both Guo Songmin's criticism and Hu Xijin's remarks need to be thought about and discussed in depth. These netizens may call for both sides to be more open and inclusive in the face of different points of view in order to promote social harmony and progress.
Please note that the above is only speculation based on the general situation, and actual user reviews may vary due to various factors. On social media and in the news comment section, you can find comments from netizens with various views and positions, forming a diverse discussion atmosphere.
From official information, netizen comments and Guo Songmin's criticism of Hu Xijin, Lao Qian summed up the following views:
First of all, Hu Xijin, as a well-known media person, has a large number of fans, and his remarks have a certain influence among the public. Hu Xijin's views are often objective and unique, full of positive energy, which can guide readers to have an in-depth understanding of the international situation and improve their cognitive level. However, Guo Songmin frequently criticized Hu Xijin, and criticized and criticized his remarks, which to a certain extent shows that Guo Songmin has a special enthusiasm and motivation for criticizing Hu Xijin.
Secondly, it can be seen from the comments of netizens that people's attitudes towards Guo Songmin's criticism of Hu Xijin are diverse. Some netizens supported Guo Songmin's view, believing that he had made reasonable criticisms of Hu Xijin's vague understanding and misleading remarks on ethnic issues. They held that Guo Songmin's viewpoint of emphasizing the pluralism and unity of the Chinese nation was correct, and they hoped that Hu Xijin would be more cautious in handling his remarks concerning ethnic issues. However, some netizens are opposed to Guo Songmin's criticism, believing that his rhetoric is too fierce and lacks objectivity and rationality. They believe that Hu Xijin has the right to express his views, even if they may not be entirely correct.
Moreover, when Guo Songmin criticizes Hu Xijin, he is sometimes able to make some insightful points, but sometimes he is too extreme and emotional. His criticisms are often strongly personal, and sometimes even rise to the point of accusations against Hu Xijin's personal qualities, which to a certain extent affects the objectivity and fairness of his criticism.
Finally, from the perspective of the whole incident, both Guo Songmin's criticism and Hu Xijin's remarks need to be understood and analyzed in the broader social and cultural context. In this era of information explosion, people need to maintain a rational and objective attitude, and make prudent assessments and judgments on various opinions and remarks. At the same time, we should also respect everyone's freedom of speech and allow different voices to communicate and collide in the public sphere to promote social progress and development.
To sum up, Lao Qian believes that when dealing with such incidents, we should maintain an open and inclusive mind, not only pay attention to the reasonable demands of critics, but also respect the freedom of speech of the critics. At the same time, we should also strengthen our learning and understanding of public issues, improve our cognitive level and judgment ability, so as to better participate in social discussions and public decision-making.
For Hu Xijin, the attitude of media people is not all critical, but shows a diversified and complex situation.
On the one hand, some media people did criticize Hu Xijin. These criticisms may be directed at some of his specific views, remarks or actions, and that he is not thoughtful or too one-sided on certain issues. This kind of criticism helps to promote the public's in-depth thinking about the problem, and also helps Hu Xijin to self-reflect and improve.
On the other hand, there are also media people who have a supportive or understanding attitude towards Hu Xijin. They believe that Hu Xijin has unique views on certain issues and is able to put forward novel views and opinions. At the same time, they also understand Hu Xijin's position and role as a media person, and believe that his remarks and actions represent a certain social voice or position to a certain extent.
Therefore, we cannot simply reduce the attitude of media people towards Hu Xijin to all criticism. In fact, there will be different voices and opinions about any public figure or point of view. It is important that we maintain an objective and rational attitude and make prudent assessments and judgments of various opinions and remarks.
In addition, it is worth noting that the attitude of media professionals may be influenced by a variety of factors, including personal positions, interests, social background, etc. Therefore, when interpreting the attitudes of media people, we need to take these factors into account and avoid being too one-sided or simplistic.
In short, we should maintain an open and inclusive mind for Hu Xijin and any other public figures or opinions, allow different voices and opinions to exist, and promote the progress and development of society through rational discussion and exchange.
As for the attitude of media people towards Hu Xijin, in summary, it is diverse and complex
On the one hand, there are indeed some media people who are critical of Hu Xijin and may criticize some of his views, remarks or behaviors. These criticisms may see Hu as lacking thoughtfulness or being too one-sided on certain issues, thus pushing the public to think deeply about the issues and prompting Hu to self-reflect and improve.
On the other hand, there are also media people who have a supportive or understanding attitude towards Hu Xijin. They may appreciate Hu's unique and fresh views on certain issues, while understanding his position and role as a media person. These media people believe that Hu Xijin's remarks and actions reflect the voice or position of society to some extent.
In addition, media people's attitudes towards Hu Xijin may also be affected by a variety of factors, including personal positions, interests, social background, etc. Therefore, when interpreting the attitudes of media people, we need to take these factors into account and avoid being too one-sided or simplistic.
To sum up, the attitude of media people towards Hu Xijin is not single, but shows the characteristics of diversity. We should maintain an open and inclusive mind, allow different voices and opinions to exist, and promote the progress and development of society through rational discussion and exchange. At the same time, we also need to carefully evaluate the statements of media professionals to form a comprehensive and objective understanding. #头条热榜##春日生活打卡季#
#臣妾主义批判#