At the end of Ma Ying-jeou's visit to the mainland, the island has expressed its stance one after another, highly affirming Ma Ying-jeou's move, going against the current tide against the current cross-strait background, not fearing the DPP's smearing, insisting on peace and exchanges, and opposing war; more importantly, on the mainland, he has repeatedly reiterated his opposition to "Taiwan independence," insisted on one China on both sides of the strait, and adhered to the "consensus of '92," and was received by the highest rules; in particular, Ma Ying-jeou stressed that both sides of the strait are descendants of Yan and Huang and are both Chinese nations, and Ma Ying-jeou still represents the peaceful force on the island.
Compared with Ma Ying-jeou's visit to the mainland, the Kuomintang heavyweights cut off one after another, and Ma Ying-jeou's return to Taiwan this time can be said to have won the attention of the KMT, including Huang Jianting, secretary general of the Chinese Kuomintang, and Kuomintang "legislators" Lai Shih-bao, Luo Zhiqiang, Tu Quanji, Weng Xiaoling, and others all went to the airport to pick up the plane, and Ma Ying-jeou stressed at the airport that both sides of the strait are descendants of Yan and Huang and belong to the Chinese nation, and said that this is the most important harvest of this trip to the mainland.
More importantly, the Chinese on both sides of the strait can handle disputes peacefully, and as long as there is a common political basis, the "consensus of '92," the two sides of the strait can continue dialogue. It can be seen that the two sides of the strait adhere to the "consensus of '92" and identify with the Chinese nation, and both sides of the strait belong to one China, and with the wisdom of the Chinese, there is no problem that cannot be solved.
On April 11, Tsai Zhengyuan said on the program that the DPP continues Tsai Ing-wen's line, which is that Taiwanese are not Chinese, but the fact is that 98 percent of the Taiwanese people are Han Chinese, and both sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation, which cannot be cut. However, for the sake of the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the strait, Ma Ying-jeou can only appeal to the feelings of the Chinese nation to resolve these two issues.
In conclusion, Cai Zhengyuan pointed out that by emphasizing the Chinese nation on both sides of the strait, they are trying to turn the tide for peaceful reunification, but this is not the case with the green camp abacus. Obviously, the DPP does not want to accept the '92 consensus. In this regard, Zhan Chih-hong, vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council, said that the two sides of the strait should not preset any political stance or premise in order to find issues of mutual concern and discuss solutions, and stressed that the MAC advocates that the two sides of the strait should live in peace and jointly maintain regional harmony and stability.
This shows that the DPP is refusing to resume dialogue under the premise of the "consensus of '92" and deliberately provoking the mainland's red line. When talking about the "consensus of '92," Zhan Chih-hong, vice chairman of Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, directly denied the "consensus of '92" and said that in 1992 a consensus could not be reached, but the dispute was shelved.
When talking about the fact that both sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation, the Taiwan Mainland Affairs Commission directly denied the "Chinese" identity. The Taiwan Mainland Affairs Council's statement is to criticize Ma Ying-jeou's statement on the mainland, saying that both sides of the strait belong to the Chinese nation and are descendants of Yan and Huang, and then reduce Ma Ying-jeou's influence in Taiwan and attack Ma Ying-jeou in disguise.
In addition to the Taiwan Mainland Affairs Commission, when Xiao Meiqin met with the visiting delegation of the 2049 Program Research Institute, a US think tank, in view of the cross-strait situation, she continued to say that cross-strait dialogue will help reduce risks and miscalculations, and the DPP has an open attitude towards cross-strait dialogue, and has reiterated on several occasions that it is willing to engage in dialogue and exchanges with China under the conditions of reciprocity, dignity, and no political preconditions.
Judging from the statements made by the Taiwan Mainland Affairs Council and Hsiao Mei-qin, there is absolutely no way to see future peace between the two sides of the strait, and there is absolutely no way to resolve the cross-strait crisis. With Ma Ying-jeou's current visit to the mainland being able to cool down the cross-strait situation in a short period of time, if the DPP is still provocative, unwilling to take the ball well, and continues to make further political attacks and negate the "Chinese nation," cross-strait relations will not blossom, and on the contrary, cross-strait relations will certainly blossom.