A netizen posted on the social platform that when he was taking a bath, he found a short blade from the commonly used Skincare soap. The level of detail of this "stealth weapon" is astonishing, and if it touches the skin during the bath, the consequences are unimaginable. As soon as this news came out, it immediately drove the entire Internet public opinion.
Netizens have expressed strong unease and worry, and have questioned the hidden dangers of product quality control. But at the same time, there are also people who question the authenticity of this matter. At the same time, the consumer brand Skincare gave a perfunctory response, failing to dispel the doubts of netizens. Netizens took photos of the scene as soon as possible after the incident, and posted photos of the short but dangerous blades found in the commonly used soap.
The blade in the photo is meticulous and incredibly sharp, about 1 centimeter long, and is firmly and deeply embedded in the soap. If you are unfortunate enough to scratch the skin, the consequence is likely to be bleeding profusely. Due to the timely discovery time, I was not injured. But his concern is that if a child uses it, or if he passes by without seeing it, the consequences are not trivial.
The real purpose of the netizen to publish this matter is to let more consumers understand this hidden danger and let the quality of the product be paid enough attention. He did not do it for compensation or personal gain, but his decisive actions, including calling the police to complain at the first time and making real recordings of Lianmai, fully retained the most authentic clues and evidence, which set off heated discussions on the Internet.
As soon as the incident was exposed, the official of Skincare gave a perfunctory response: "This situation rarely happens, and we have always implemented strict quality control. This response failed to dispel the doubts of netizens, but instead caused more doubts. Some netizens pointed out that "less happens" does not mean "no happens", and as a consumer brand, it should respond to this quality and safety hazard with a more responsible attitude.
Some netizens questioned the authenticity of the matter and were skeptical. Soon, some netizens pointed out that considering the authenticity of evidence such as police records and video screenshots, the possibility of seeking compensation for trivial matters and risking legal consequences to falsify is also very low. The overall public opinion tends to trust the clues and evidence provided by the parties, and as the incident ferments, there are more and more voices supporting rights protection.
Netizens have called for brands to take consumer safety as the primary consideration, rather than taking a perfunctory attitude. Some netizens also pointed out that this shows the weak links in the safety and quality supervision of daily necessities, and hopes that relevant departments can pay attention to and rectify them.
Quality and safety issues can not be ignored, and the subtleties are related to life and death, but also to the healthy development of the whole society. Brands and regulators alike should hold themselves accountable to a higher standard.