"This is the national emblem and has a sacred right"
"I'm going to complain about your abuse of power, you're abolished!"
In just two sentences, he has "lost all the face" of the lawyer's profession! It is the duty of every citizen to cooperate with the police in enforcing the law, but this lawyer relied on his knowledge of the law to be a tough policeman.
Not only claim that the other party does not have the right to check their ID card, but also complain that the other party is abusing their power.
In our opinion, when we usually take the train, we will also encounter the police to check the ID card, and we will usually look at it casually, anyway, we will do something wrong, but this lawyer believes that the police do not have this right.
So does the police have the right to check it? Is the lawyer defending his own rights and interests? Or is there something he doesn't want to show?
According to a report on April 9 when the rule of law was in progress, on April 8, on a train in Jiangsu, a police officer asked for an ID card to be checked, but a man wearing a mask looked extremely excited.
He believed that the ID card had a national emblem and a sacred right, and it was not for anyone who wanted to check it, so he refused to be viewed by the police.
At the same time, he also stressed that he is a lawyer and can popularize legal knowledge to everyone, and in this case, he does not need to show his ID card.
In contrast to the lawyer's yelling, it was this police officer, maybe he had too many common experiences, so he didn't take it seriously, and said calmly, you ask everyone, is it all in the car with ID cards.
After hearing this, the lawyer replied, you have the right to choose, I used my ID card to enter the station, why do you have to check it again?
After hearing this, the police didn't plan to bother with him, so they said then you can sit. But the lawyer man did not give up, moved out of the constitution, said that he abused his power, and finally said that he would take pictures of the police and complain about him.
Perhaps thinking that this was not enough, he added: "You are wasted!"
In the face of the endless lawyer man, the police replied domineeringly: You are welcome to complain, it seems that you are not afraid at all.
This is all the video exposed on the Internet, and I don't know if I saw the ID card in the end, and I don't know if the lawyer man has complained, so let's squat and follow up.
So the question is, is what the lawyer man said right?
According to a report by China Traffic Broadcasting, lawyer Cheng of Beijing Dentons Law Firm also explained that according to the current laws and administrative regulations, there is no such provision.
According to the Administrative Measures for the Real-Name System for Railway Passenger Tickets, from January 1, 2023, Article 21 clearly stipulates that railway transport enterprises can conduct necessary real-name checks on trains.
According to article 15 of the "Law of the People's Republic of China on Resident Identity Cards", when performing their duties, people's police may inspect their resident identity cards upon presentation of their law enforcement identification.
One of them is that in places such as railway stations, it is necessary to ascertain the identity of the person concerned.
If you refuse to show your ID, you may be subject to varying degrees of penalties:
If a criminal act is constituted, violent resistance to the people's police checking the identity card in accordance with law may be pursued for criminal responsibility in accordance with law;
For violations of the administration of public security, public security penalties will be imposed in accordance with the law, such obstruction of law enforcement may be punished with a warning or a fine of up to 200 yuan, and if the circumstances are serious, detention of not less than 5 days but not more than 10 days, and a fine of not more than 500 yuan.
However, if citizens believe that the law enforcement by the police is not standardized, they can also protect their rights and interests through legal channels.
Therefore, in this incident, if the police have already shown their documents, but the lawyer still does not cooperate, then it is an obstruction of law enforcement.
And the police didn't care about him, he also said that the other party was "abolished" and "wanted to complain", although it was also his right, but it inevitably seemed a little small.
Even ordinary people know that they have to cooperate with the people's police to enforce the law, and as a lawyer, he not only does not cooperate, but also says that the other party has no rights.
If he is really a lawyer, but he has made such a low-level mistake, I wonder what the law firm will think of it, will he not even be able to keep his job in the end?
Therefore, after the incident fermented, the comments of netizens also questioned his profession:
"It's no problem for the police to check the ID card, just bring it and take it out, a few seconds, why is he unwilling?"
"At first glance, he looks like a dog-headed lawyer, don't the police often check ID cards in public places? Which law says that documents with the national emblem cannot be viewed?"
"Is a lawyer great? Can he override the law? Isn't this just looking for lawbreakers who have escaped? This is legal and reasonable."
"It is recommended to strictly investigate this lawyer, don't you know if the police have the right to do so?"
"Is it too embarrassing for such a lawyer to get mixed up in this industry?" "Either you will take back your lawyer's certificate, or you will know the law and break the law, and you will not even know the most basic business."
"The police are also a type of police, they are responsible for the safety of the passengers on the entire train, and of course have the power to carry out inspections."
"I'm curious, whether he committed a crime, otherwise why wouldn't he dare to take it out?", "This kind of lawyer should revoke his qualification certificate quickly"
However, there are also those who stand on the side of the lawyer's man:
"You are really a group of legal illiterates, this lawyer is right, even if you are a policeman, you can't check it in any place you want, either there is a specific suspect, or you must first show your identity documents and explain the reason for the inspection, otherwise you will exceed your authority, and the general police only have the right to check the ticket"
Perhaps in our opinion, the ID card is our own belonging, and we don't want to take it out casually to protect our personal information.
But as long as you look far, you can know how many benefits this real-name system has, and in countries where there is no real-name system to buy tickets, even if there is a case of theft on the bus, it will take time and energy to find out who this person is.
In the case of the non-real-name system, all kinds of crimes emerge one after another, such as theft, trafficking, and intentional injury.
But as long as there is a real-name system, if these criminals want to commit crimes, they must think about whether they can run away and whether there is a way out.
And now in some places, not only ID cards can be used, but also face scanning, which can better ensure the safety of passengers. Otherwise, you will be sitting next to an unknown passenger who has not gone through the security check, and you must be at ease.
It is precisely because of this real-name system that the epidemic has been effectively controlled, because it can be specific to each person, and who this person has come into contact with, can also be grasped.
It's hard to imagine how serious the consequences would have been if there had been no real-name system at that time.
Therefore, when we usually go out, we must cooperate with the police, because they shoulder our safety.
And the lawyer man in this incident may feel that he is familiar with the law, or maybe he feels that he should stand up and popularize the relevant law for everyone, so he is so excited and resistant.
But as everyone knows, his legal knowledge reserve is still far behind, I hope that after this incident, he can also learn a lesson, and everyone should not go to cyberbullying him, after all, people are not saints and sages.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss!