This kick by the chief of the permanent section of the taxation bureau of a certain district in Fuzhou City not only kicked off his own dignity, but also smeared the organization.
The phrase "What level are you? I am not afraid of the mayor" is even more a reflection of the unhealthy trend behind it.
Originally, it was too much to ask the hotel owner for a refund for the second time, but I didn't expect to beat people without saying a word, and then the relevant departments dealt with it and the fire department "called" the next day, which made the hotel owner cry: retaliation!
As the incident was exposed, the local report was also released, and this time the section chief and Chen of the Xiangyang Municipal Audit Bureau were a big deal.
According to a report by "Today's Video" on April 9, the owner of a hotel in Zaoyang City, Hubei Province, told reporters that several public officials had disputes with him over their own problems, and as a result, they not only beat themselves, but also threatened to close the hotel.
According to the boss, at 10 p.m. on February 15, Chen Mou, the chief of the Taxation Bureau of a district in Fuzhou City and a public official of the Xiangyang City Audit Bureau, came to his hotel to play cards.
After hitting halfway, they thought that the hotel room environment was not good, so they asked to check out, and the boss didn't say anything and refunded them on the spot, but after a while, the other party said that he had not received a refund and asked him to return again.
It stands to reason that the boss opened the door to do business, naturally to make money, but they had already used the room, and he saw that they were public officials, so he did not deduct them from half the price of the room, but returned it in a good temper.
But unexpectedly, they didn't admit it, and they had to return it again, and the boss of this kind of loss-making business was naturally unwilling, so he proposed to check the monitoring, but in this process, the two sides had a quarrel.
Maybe he felt that his majesty had been provoked, or maybe he felt that he had made himself lose face, so Section Chief Chang gave the boss a kick from behind, and then a physical altercation broke out between the two sides.
The other party is overwhelming, and the boss only has to be beaten.
During this period, the other party also threatened: "What level are you? I am not afraid of the mayor, and I will seal your hotel."
Although it is said that "the people do not fight with the officials", in order to fight for a breath, the hotel owner still called the police, but the result was unexpected.
According to the administrative penalty letter issued by the local public security, we can know the following:
1. Chang Moumou is indeed the section chief of the tax bureau of a certain district;
2. The two parties had a dispute over the room rate, and Chang Moumou kicked him because the hotel owner spoke badly;
3. Chang Moumou's behavior has constituted assault on others, violating the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law of the People's Republic of China";
4. Give a warning to Chang and reprimand him on the spot.
Although the public security organs dealt with the case, the hotel owner was not satisfied, and the other party only apologized, but did not compensate or punish him.
And the day after he called the police, he received a call from the local fire department, so the hotel owner felt that this was Chang Moumou's "retaliation".
In this way, the hotel owner has three dissatisfactions, namely: Chang Moumou's punishment is too light, Chen Moumou and others are not punished, and the local fire department "retaliates".
However, these are all statements made by the hotel owner, as for how many people did it, it depends on all the monitoring at the time, as well as the notices of relevant departments, otherwise the police could not only punish Chang Moumou, so everyone should still look at and speak rationally.
Just after the incident fermented, the staff of the local fire brigade also responded, saying that the higher authorities had set up a working group to intervene in the investigation, and denied "retaliation" after collecting relevant information and the reaction of the parties.
Although there was no retaliation, Chang Moumou's behavior was clearly filmed by the surveillance, so the comments of netizens were also one-sided:
"It's really an eye-opener, the section chief of a district can go to an urban area to play cards and spread wild?"
"The hotel owner is still too young, can he still open it when this gust of wind passes?", "How much higher is the level of Fuzhou than Xiangyang? Can civil servants blatantly gamble?"
"Can this matter be thoroughly investigated? Can the boss be able to do business in peace?" "If the situation is true, then it should be dealt with seriously", "It is really rampant, gathering crowds to play cards and beating people?"
"Dare to break the law and discipline with taxpayers' money? This kind of reckless behavior should be severely punished, and the people should be given a clear sky."
"Strongly demand that the Commission for Discipline Inspection intervene in the investigation and deal with it seriously, whether it is a person who plays people or cards, whether it should be explained or not"
"Even the mayor doesn't pay attention to it, and it really should be dealt with harshly"
Although netizens are very angry, it is still the same sentence, now these are the statements of the hotel owner, and the truth depends on the official report.
However, according to the monitoring and the administrative punishment decision given by the police, several inappropriate points can still be drawn:
1. Is it compliant for public officials to gather to play cards?
The penalty for gathering a crowd to play cards depends on whether the act of playing cards constitutes gambling, and if it is not for profit, then it will not be punished, and if it constitutes gambling or gambling as a business, it may be subject to criminal penalties.
But as a public official, even when he gets off work, he also represents the image of a civil servant, so whether this approach is appropriate or not, everyone will see the wisdom of the wise.
2. As a public official, don't you know that it is a crime to beat someone, and if you know that you still do it, is it not a violation of the law and a contempt of the law?
3. The administrative penalty notice is written in February, but now it is April, why did the hotel owner not expose it at that time, but chose to expose it two months later? What happened during this period? Can the hotel still be opened?
As the saying goes, "If you don't make decisions for the people, you might as well go home and sell sweet potatoes." As a public official, we must always keep in mind that we are serving the people, and we must be anxious about what the people are anxious about and think about what the people think, instead of making trouble in the places where the people are doing normal business.
Dare to be so arrogant under the surveillance, it is hard to imagine how domineering it will be behind it.
Although this incident is extremely infuriating, there is also a positive side, if it weren't for this exposure, maybe this incident would have passed, and then it would have been more unscrupulous in the future.
It's not terrible to have a problem, it's terrible to cover up when there is a problem, so I have to give a thumbs up to the local public security here, they can intervene at the first time, and investigate clearly that the boss did pay, and can give appropriate punishment according to the law, no cover-up, no cover-up, and can do business, which is very commendable.
At the same time, after the incident fermented, the Xiangyang Audit Bureau also responded and reported, the staff said that Chen and others went to beat eggs, did not find gambling activities, and had seriously criticized their inappropriate remarks, and made a written inspection, and apologized to the parties.
And Chang Moumou was also punished with a warning from the party.
In other words, there was only Chang Moumou who beat people, but Chen Moumou did not fight, and also said inappropriate remarks, so they were all punished, but Chang Moumou did not apologize to the party.
However, in response to these results, the hotel owner was not satisfied, because after this incident, it had a great impact on his spirit and the business of the store, so the boss also carried out an administrative reconsideration of the administrative punishment given to Chang Moumou by the police, and the reconsideration results have not yet come out.
What do you think about this?Do you think this hotel can still be opened?Welcome to leave a message to discuss!