"If you buy a fake, it's hard to compensate for it, what's wrong with the world?" Recently, a compensation incident about fake Moutai has caused an uproar on the Internet. Mr. Jiang, a consumer, spent more than 20,000 yuan on Taobao's "Ali Auction" platform to buy 7 bottles of Zodiac Moutai, thinking that he could enjoy the service of "first inspection before delivery, authenticity guarantee", but unexpectedly there were fakes. What made him even more angry was that when he made a claim for compensation to the platform for "ten for one fake", he was told that "the platform does not enforce the law and wants to pay ten times the compensation directly through the legal route".
Loading...
Mr. Jiang's experience is not an isolated case, and in today's increasingly popular online shopping, the problem of consumers' difficulty in protecting their rights is becoming more and more prominent. But Mr. Jiang's story is like a mirror, reflecting the difficulties on the road to online shopping rights protection.
Let's go back to the starting point of the event. In the three stores of "Ali Auction", Mr. Jiang saw those tempting zodiac Moutai liquors. On the product page, "Identification by authoritative inspection agencies, first inspection before issuance, authenticity guarantee" gave him a reassurance. However, when a friend pointed out that there was a problem with the cap coding of two of the bottles, his heart sank to the bottom.
The results of the inspection made his mood even worse: two of the four bottles were fakes. Although the other two bottles were not clearly judged to be fake, the merchant's attitude towards the handling was suspicious - one bottle agreed to only refund the bottle, and the other agreed to triple the compensation. Such a way of dealing with it can't help but make people deeply doubt the promise of "authenticity guarantee".
Faced with such a result, Mr. Jiang was naturally unwilling. He is well aware that alcohol is food, and according to the law, he has every right to claim compensation for "one for one for fake". However, when he made this request to Alibaba's customer service, he got such a reply.
"The platform stipulates that one false pays three, the law is the law, and the platform has no way to enforce the law. The customer service's response was like a basin of cold water, extinguishing all of Mr. Jiang's hopes. Could it be that this is the so-called "authenticity guarantee"? Could it be that the rights and interests of consumers have been wantonly trampled on?
"Fake one pays ten" was originally a solemn promise of the law to consumers, but now it has become a blank check. We can't help but ask: in this seemingly glamorous era of e-commerce, what are the rights and interests of consumers?
Can Alibaba, the e-commerce giant, be above the law? No, we can't tolerate such behavior. The law is the guardian of fairness, and no one can trample on it at will.
We have to admit that although online shopping brings convenience, it also brings many problems. Among them, the protection of consumer rights and interests is particularly prominent. On this seemingly equal trading platform, consumers are often in a vulnerable position. They are faced with powerful e-commerce platforms and merchants, and once they encounter counterfeit goods or fraud, the road to protecting their rights is often full of difficulties.
And Alibaba's customer service response has made people question the platform's sense of responsibility. As an e-commerce giant, Alibaba should take on more social responsibilities than put obstacles in the way of consumer rights protection. The law is the bottom line of society, and any business and individual should abide by it. If even the law can be flouted and trampled on, then how can the rights and interests of consumers be protected?
Mr. Jiang's story is a wake-up call. Today, when online shopping is increasingly becoming a part of our lives, we should be more vigilant and protect our rights and interests. At the same time, we also call on e-commerce platforms and merchants to truly operate with integrity, comply with laws and regulations, and provide consumers with a safe and reliable shopping environment.
Of course, as consumers, we also have to learn to use legal weapons to protect ourselves. When our rights and interests are violated, we should not choose silence and retreat, but should bravely stand up and defend our rights. Only in this way can we jointly create a fair and just consumption environment.
In this case, we can't help but ask: If it is difficult to enforce even the legal provisions of "10 for 10 fakes", then how should the rights and interests of consumers be protected? This question is worth pondering.
Finally, we hope that the relevant authorities will strengthen supervision to ensure that e-commerce platforms and merchants comply with laws and regulations, and at the same time, we also hope that e-commerce platforms and merchants will consciously assume their social responsibilities and provide better services to consumers. Only in this way can we jointly promote the healthy development of the online shopping industry.
What do you think about this matter? Feel free to leave your views in the comment section.