Data is not only a technical issue, but also a trade issue, and more importantly, a political, economic and social issue. Data transaction is the core issue of data law, and it is also a new proposition of modern law.
Combining comparative and doctrinal approaches, this book leads us to reflect on the global competition of data regulation, and also inspires us to imagine an unconstructed system of data transaction rules. The author, Jin Jing, a teacher from China University of Political Science and Law, meticulously presented and sorted out the pluralistic relationship between market autonomy and state supervision, and effectively verified and confirmed the cornerstone of the data law.
"Data Exchange Law: EU Model and Chinese Rules" will be available to you tomorrow!
The author, Mr. Jin Jing, autographed copies, limited edition of 100 copies, sold out without replenishment, first come, first served.
Tomorrow at 12 noon, only at the McT Reading Shop.
If you want to subscribe to the sales alert and receive the notification of new books on the shelves and exclusive coupons as soon as possible, you can scan the code to add [Mai Yujun] and reply to "New Books"↓
Professor Yao Mingbin, School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law
Celebrity Reviews
Yao Mingbin (Professor, School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law):
At the perspective level, this book takes the data transaction law as the main axis, effectively integrates the three interfaces of regulatory policy, basic theory and rule configuration, and realizes a rare full-perspective observation in data law research. At the methodological level, it integrates the comparative analysis of Chinese and foreign institutional reforms, the analysis of legal doctrine for the details of the system, and the analysis of historical materials related to institutional updating, showing the possibility of interaction and mutual assistance of multiple methodologies in the study of data law. At the standpoint level, it adheres to and advocates a calm and neutral rationalist view of data law, and the views on prudently treating institutional transplantation and attaching importance to the resilience of traditional principles and institutions are particularly meaningful at present, and it also opens up to readers questions about comparative law in the field of data law. It is worth mentioning that the solid and precise literature collation work of this book also makes it an important function of basic literature index.
