Since the "lantern damage assessment" in Shangrao, Jiangxi Province became popular all over the Internet, I didn't expect this gust of wind to blow to Zhengzhou, Henan.
Recently, some media broke the news that a woman in Zhengzhou, Henan Province asked the landlord to check out after the expiration of her rent, but the landlord asked the woman to pay more than 7,000 yuan for the loss of the house after the house inspection, but this time netizens stood on the landlord's side and thought that they had to support the landlord this time.
The cause of the matter
On March 6 last year, Ms. Guo rented a house in a community in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, and after the rental contract expired on March 6 this year, Ms. Guo decided not to renew the lease, so she asked the landlord to check out.
We all know that the landlord inspects the house when checking out, checking that the house is in good condition, whether the furniture and appliances are damaged, etc. So the landlord conducted a careful inspection of Ms. Guo's rented house, and after 3 hours of careful inspection, the landlord finally made a list for Ms. Guo, asking her to pay 7,841 yuan for losses, including 2,214 yuan for cabinets, 3,400 yuan for walls, 100 yuan for wardrobes, 150 yuan for curtains, 1,200 yuan for doors, and so on.
How can you lose so much for renting a house? Is this another Henan version of the "lantern damage assessment", just when many people questioned this, the next picture let us dispel this concern.
The footage in the video shows that there are traces of damage everywhere in the room, there are many scratches on the walls, the curtains are also scratched and tattered, the sofa is also full of scratches, and even the wardrobe door is broken.
The landlord also said that the sofa in the room was a new one that she had rented to Ms. Guo, and now Ms. Guo has replaced it with a tattered sofa without her knowledge.
The cabinets in the kitchen were also flooded, and there were water stains everywhere.
Although Ms. Guo admitted that she was responsible for all this, she felt that it was unacceptable to ask her to pay 7,841 yuan. Just when both sides were deadlocked, media reporters coordinated with both parties, and finally the landlord agreed that Ms. Guo only needed to pay 3,500 yuan.
This video also caused heated discussions among netizens
The comments of netizens are one-sided, and they have said that this situation should indeed be compensated, and this time they have to support the landlord.
Some netizens also said that such a loss is too serious, it has exceeded the normal loss, and a part of the compensation should indeed be given.