Li Mei and Zhao Gang ushered in the crystallization of their love, which should have been a happy moment. However, the issue of the child's last name is quietly hiding in their marriage like a time bomb.
Li Mei insisted that her children follow her surname, which caused dissatisfaction and opposition from Zhao Gang and his family. They believe that children should be named after their father's surname, which is not only tradition, but also a reflection of identity.
As the family conflict gradually intensified, a sudden demolition incident plunged the family into a deeper crisis. Zhao Gang's family received four properties and generous compensation for the demolition, but Zhao Gang's parents showed obvious prejudice when it came to the child's surname.
They insisted that only children with the surname Zhao were eligible to inherit the property.
Children with their mother's surname have the right to inherit, but you have to be clear that the law stipulates that testamentary succession takes precedence over natural inheritance. Therefore, the old man made a will to distribute the property before his death, which is in line with the law.
From a legal point of view, it is illegal to pay a high bride price. From a moral point of view, if a woman marries a man, and a man buys a house, buys a car, earns money to support his family, and bears all the expenses of marriage, then the child has a woman's surname, which is immoral. If a woman recruits a son-in-law, and the woman is responsible for everything, then it is reasonable for the child to have a woman's surname.
What is the purpose of taking your mother's surname? Do you want your children to have a surname from generation to generation, or do you want your children to have conflicts at birth? Or do you want to have the psychology that you can't get it and don't let the man get it?
If they all follow their mother's surname, it is inevitable that they will have a surname from generation to generation! This is the final outcome of the child without an ancestor.
If the woman wants the child to have her surname, she can just recruit Xu to the door. Since you marry into someone else's family and enjoy other people's benefits, isn't it good to have children with your own surname? Normal marriage to the man's house, bride price, and car are all prepared by the man's parents, except for naked marriages.
If the child takes his mother's surname, he should ask his grandfather for an inheritance, because his grandfather has become a grandfather. If you want a bride price house and have your mother's surname, the door-to-door son-in-law is the door-to-door son-in-law, and the marriage is the marriage!
The son-in-law should follow his mother, and if he marries, he should follow his father, and it doesn't matter if he consults with each other!
Therefore, those who follow their father's surname cannot take their grandfather's property, and now they are all only children, and it is not necessarily who has more property, don't think that they are all rich and sons, and poor people are daughters.
Taking the mother's surname is not a personal problem, but a problem to consider for the two children? According to the cultural inheritance of the national conditions, how can the two brothers with different surnames face outsiders?
The essence of inheritance is to give and be given, the will of the elderly is the first, and the elderly are willing to donate to charity or to strangers.
Your child's surname is given to his mother's surname! It is equivalent to changing his nationality! You have the right to let your child have the surname of whomever they want, and parents also have the right to dispose of their own property!
If it doesn't suit his heart, he can not give it to you! Children can inherit their parents' property regardless of their surname, but if it is the property of their grandparents, it is different, because grandparents also have the right to distribute their own property.
Paternity is a fine tradition that has been passed down for thousands of years, both in China and abroad, and from a genetic point of view, this is also the case with kinship.
If you follow your motherhood, your mother's family will not recognize you as a same-sex family member and will look down on you, and similarly your father's family and people in society will look down on you, and you will be inferior in social terms unless you go to the door.
The child has the right to inherit no matter whose surname he is, this is stipulated by law! However, it is the owner of the property who decides whether to let you inherit or not, even if he gives the property to outsiders, it is also his right!
The child's surname is paid by whoever pays more. The principle of who pays more is formulated. For example, a woman is recruiting a son-in-law, paying money, buying a house, giving a bride price, and the child should be born with the mother's surname, which is understandable, if a man marries a daughter-in-law, any expenses are paid by the man, and the child born is with the husband's surname!
The law stipulates that there is the right to inheritance, but the law also stipulates that if there is a will, it will be inherited according to the will! If the old man is unwilling, of course he can not inherit him!
Both father and mother have the right to inherit, but, after taking the mother's surname, the grandparents always feel that they have become the children of other people's families, so they specify that the inheritance is excluded, which is the ancestral ancestral hall outside the surname is not subject to the rule of incense protection, and it is not included in the family tree.
As an inheritance, the law of inheritance rights has long been decided. The problem is that if the property owner is alive, he has the right to dispose of his property, and it is completely okay for the in-laws not to give the property to the children who follow the mother's nature, and the one who follows the mother's nature can go to receive the property of the grandfather's family, and it is not a loss.
After this, there will be more and more such problems, the marriage fee is paid by the man, and the baby is not with the man's surname, what do the man's parents think, the inheritance right is stipulated by law, but the old man also has the right to dispose of his property.
It must be made clear that the child follows the woman's surname, this is the relationship between the man and his child, the relationship with the man's family and the woman's family.
Isn't the mother's surname just for the sake of the mother's family?
The child's surname can follow the father or mother's nature, there is no problem, but the old man's inheritance can be set up for whoever inherits, there is no problem, don't be entangled, when you make a decision, you should think about what happened later.
This issue should be looked at in two ways, first, there are two aspects of property inheritance, one is the law, and the other is the will. If that's what the old family thinks, the law is right to write a written will.
Secondly, the woman strongly demanded that the son follow the mother's surname, which is the freedom of the husband and wife, but the disposal of the property of the old family is also the freedom of the old family. The woman should understand. You can't double standard, and you can take advantage of the good things yourself.
According to the law, the owner has the right to dispose of his property, and the child's surname must first comply with the opinions of the elderly, so the child's surname must bear the due consequences if the child is given the mother's surname.
First of all, it is necessary to find out that the right of inheritance is only available to immediate relatives such as sons and daughters, so what does it have to do with their grandchildren?
Unless their son dies, the grandson can inherit by subrogation, and their property can be inherited by will, they can give it to whoever they want, it has nothing to do with the surname, then the grandson should follow the mother's surname, then let him go to his grandfather's and grandmother's house to inherit it!
Inheritance and disposal of one's own property are not the same thing, according to the law you have the right to take the child's mother's surname, and the elderly have the right to dispose of their own property.
The old man thinks that there is nothing wrong with the grandson not having his surname, disposing of his own property, and leaving no property for inheritance after his death, and of course it is not illegal, and you are now forcibly connecting the two different issues.
The next generation has no inheritance right, testamentary succession is preferred, and re-inheritance is a matter after the death of the property owner, and the property of the property owner is disposed of by the property owner.
In the future, the children will follow their mothers, let the mother-in-law and the father-in-law buy a house and buy a car, and in the future, their family's property will be inherited by their grandchildren, and his surname will also be his grandson, so that the future of raising a son will not be so tired, there are grandparents to help your family raise grandchildren, and inherit their family's property, why not?
Although the surname has nothing to do with blood, it is about the fundamentals, sooner or later the child will not be the father's family, and it will also make the children in the family feel different, affecting the child's physical and mental health.
In the matter of property inheritance, the party concerned does not let you inherit it, there is no way, even if it is the father and son, he will not let you inherit and you will not win!
It is not a simple surname, it contains the descendants, inheritance, clan, ancestors, incense, the progress of human beings from matrilineal society to patrilineal society, public order and good customs......
When it comes to inheritance, does the woman's family have a mine or a throne to inherit? A legal and valid will from the man's hometown, not to mention the grandchildren with a foreign surname, even the son with his own surname probably don't worry about anything.
Civil Code law stipulates that a child's surname should not be the reason for determining their inheritance. See clearly that the child is not a grandchild or a grandchild, or a grandchild with a foreign surname.
Moreover, the first in line of succession are children, spouses, and parents. In the end, only the estate of the deceased can be inherited. Can a living person be called an inheritance?
The demolition and relocation belong to the old man! They can give it to whomever they want! Since they insist on their children and their surnames, regardless of the old man's insistence! Then the result is what they want! Besides, your family has the throne and inherits, and you don't care about the four suites!
If the child takes the mother's surname, the man must return the bride price, house, and car that the son gave when he got married, and the woman must also give the man's parents a certain bride price. Children can inherit the property of their grandparents, but not their grandparents.
There is no conflict between inheriting property and supporting parents, inheriting more and supporting more, inheriting less and supporting less, and the overall opening is seven or three, and the man's property is inherited with the father's surname.
The man did not object to the child supporting the woman's parents because of this, and guaranteed the support of the woman's parents, while the woman got the right to the surname, but did not support the man's parents, which shows that our man is more broad-minded than the woman.
Why does the woman want to have a child and her surname, isn't this a slap in the face? Formulating the child's surname with that party is mainly about marrying to determine the surname.
According to the 5,000-year-old Chinese culture, it is a Chinese cultural tradition to follow the father's surname, on the contrary, it is irreproachable to follow the woman's surname, and a few so-called experts have destroyed the 5,000-year-old Chinese tradition and caused the separation of family harmony!