U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen ended her trip in Guangzhou and arrived in Beijing to continue her visit, and Yellen publicly reiterated that the United States and China will not "decouple" while in Guangzhou, and the reason given by Yellen is that the United States and China have huge economic and trade cooperation, so decoupling is detrimental to both sides. Despite U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen's visit to China, the U.S. has shown little goodwill, and in fact, the U.S., Japan, Australia, and the Philippines have held joint military exercises in the South China Sea on April 7. In addition, the commander of the U.S. Army Pacific in Tokyo, Japan, publicly threatened that the U.S. military plans to deploy intermediate-range missiles in the Asia-Pacific region by 2024.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen reiterated that there is no decoupling, but what the United States is doing is decoupling from China, according to foreign media reports, the United States suddenly announced an announcement against a Chinese walkie-talkie company issued a ban, requiring Chinese companies to stop selling walkie-talkie products worldwide from now on, in fact, the ban also includes the Chinese market. In response to the ban issued by the American Development Institute, the relevant companies have issued an announcement announcing the cessation of all sales of the corresponding walkie-talkies. In fact, the U.S. Development Institute not only issued a ban, but also required Chinese companies to pay a fine of $1 million per day before completing the ban on the U.S. Development Institute. The U.S. Development Institute has also publicly threatened to prevent Chinese companies from filing lawsuits through Chinese courts.
Judging from the actions of the United States, it is a typical "long-arm jurisdiction" handling model, that is, using the ruling of the US Development Institute to deal with the global sales of Chinese enterprises, highlighting the hegemonic nature of the United States. According to public information, the Chinese companies blacklisted by the American Development Institute are the leading enterprises of walkie-talkies, occupying a large number of market shares in the world, and now the United States is directly targeting China's leading walkie-talkie companies, obviously with the purpose of "killing chickens and monkeys", judging from the actions of the United States, it does not take into account the atmosphere of the visit of US Treasury Secretary Yellen to China, highlighting the mentality of the United States "doing its own thing".
In fact, this is because the United States has the hegemony of the dollar, and Chinese enterprises need to settle their sales abroad through the dollar, thus providing a basis for the "long-arm jurisdiction" of the United States. The United States can sanction Chinese companies through the settlement system, and at the same time can also sanction companies and personnel who trade with Chinese companies, which is the usual means of the United States, before the United States sanctioned Chinese communication companies, it was carried out through the domestic law of the United States, which directly led to the plummeting market share of high-end mobile phone products of Chinese enterprises.
When U.S. Secretary of State Blinken visited Europe, he publicly threatened, claiming that China had provided assistance to Russia, so that Russia could develop in many areas, including achieving results in the Ukraine crisis conflict, for which Blinken issued a threat, claiming that if Chinese companies provide material and equipment support to Russia, the United States will make Chinese companies pay the price, in fact, the United States has publicly issued threats in 2023 to prevent China from providing military aid to Ukraine, highlighting the United States' "double standard". Now that the United States has once again struck hard, it is obvious that it wants to make China submit to the "long-arm jurisdiction" of the United States, but in fact, China already has the means to counter it, because China also has corresponding laws, thus providing a basis for countering the "long-arm jurisdiction" of the United States.