First of all, let's understand a question, is there more than 1.4 billion middle and lower classes in China, or is there more than 2 million people who are extremely rich?
For the middle and lower classes, a thousand is a lot, enough to consume for several days, but for the extremely wealthy, goose feathers are not comparable.
The distribution of money for all is essentially to alleviate the gap between the rich and the poor, and to thin out the wealth of those who are extremely wealthy.
However, some economists have given a new view of profit, they believe that the society will print a lot of money, so that the society will have more money, and the large amount of assets held by the rich will naturally rise, and the rich will become richer.
Printing money is bound to produce inflation, that's for sure, isn't the United States the best example?
But you can't afford to buy a house for 1 million, and even if it becomes 10 million, you can't afford it, what does this asset have to do with the people at the bottom?
Giving money is essentially a distribution of wealth.
In the era of infrastructure, housing prices rose rapidly at that time. There are no channels, and there are not many people on the Internet, and ordinary people will know about it, anyway, it is ordinary people who are injured by what they do.
It turned out that when the economy was bad, the state printed money, carried out large projects, and paid for relief through work, and then the money was distributed to the people layer by layer for building materials and labor services, and the people had jobs and income, and consumption also rose. At present, the marginal effect of the state printing money to carry out large projects is getting lower and lower, and it is deducted by middlemen at all levels, and there is not one in the hands of the people, so the effect of the original investment of several trillion yuan cannot be achieved by tens of trillions now.
The water can't reach the hands of the people, so they can only send money, which is the fairest and most efficient, and there is no middleman to deduct it. Whether it is printing money or paying taxes, the rich and the poor will definitely have different effects if they send the same money.
Talking about inflation is the most meaningless, I ask you what was the level of 10,000 households a few decades ago?
The government will give money to stimulate the economy, and the middlemen at all levels make the difference, so why not send it directly to the people?
Everybody gives money is equal to no money, and those economists have their butts with the capitalists.
In recent years, the state has also printed a lot of money, but it has not reached the people, so when prices rise, wages will not rise.
To sum up, we must persist in developing science and technology, industrial upgrading, and the development of social productive forces, do everything possible to prevent the rich from avoiding taxes, and use the method of tax distribution to get rich first and lead the latter to get rich.
The future of socialist New China will certainly be even more beautiful.