角度刁钻,OPPO Find X7 Ultra、vivo X100 Pro、小米13U和三星S23U取景框与高像素模式对比
Normal photo comparison, will only mention the definition of the frame, but in the process of doing Find X7 Ultra photo comparison, I found that there is a huge gap in the clarity of the camera preview interface of several machines, so there is this tricky comparison project.
然后补几张OPPO Find X7 Ultra、vivo X100 Pro、小米13 Ultra和三星Galaxy S23 Ultra的高像素模式对比。
The camera specifications are directly on the table ↓
Main capture view, global and central zoom
Medium-focus framing, global and center zoom
(Only vivo X100 Pro is 3 cameras, and the upper and lower ones are 4.3x telephoto↑ ↓)
Super telephoto viewing, global and center zoom
Camera viewfinder sharpness:
The most detailed is the Find X7 Ultra (the kind that is far ahead, and probably the flagship with the clearest preview box right now)
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra and the Samsung S23 Ultra count 55 open
Although the X100 Pro has enough detail in the finished film, the 4.3x telephoto is not as much as 3 times that of its competitors in the frame
X100 ProThe difference in the definition of the preview video stream of the viewfinder frame may be related to the Fa Ge platform? Or it may be because the machine is a 1.5K screen, so it was deliberately lowered?
PS：
The definition of the viewfinder of the 4 machines has not touched the upper limit of the 1.5K screen, even if it is the sharpest Find X7 Ultra, the actual video stream of the viewfinder should only be between 1080P and 1.5K.
The number of pixels of the 2K screen is about 1.3 times that of the 1.5K screen, and the opening is 1.14 times. The telephoto magnification difference is 4.3x/3x=1.43x. The framing clarity of the 4.3x telephoto can't win the 3x telephoto, which is indeed a bit unreasonable.
In fact, it is a film, and if it is pulled to 5 times, vivo is stronger, if it is pulled to 6 times, OPPO is stronger, and 10 times that Samsung/vivo is stronger during the day.
And after the light is weakened, from 5x to 10x, the X100P is stronger, because it can also trigger 4.3x in low light, and OPPO can only use 2.7x IMX890 telephoto.
High-pixel mode comparison
Because the Samsung S23 Ultra only has a high-pixel mode for the main camera (200 million pixels and 50 million pixel mode), only 3 domestic flagships are comparing the high-pixel mode of the secondary camera↓
Ultra-wide-angle, high-pixel mode contrast1, global and center magnification
Ultra-wide-angle, high-pixel mode contrast2, global and center magnification
Ultra-wide, high-pixel mode contrast3, global and center magnification
Telephoto comparison 1, global and central magnification (Gan, missed the X100 Pro telephoto high pixel mode)
Telephoto comparison 2, global and central magnification (Gan, missed the X100 Pro telephoto in high pixel mode)
Main camera high-pixel mode comparison1, global and center zoomed-in
Main camera high-pixel mode comparison2, global and center zoom
Comparison of the main camera in high-pixel mode3, global and center zoom
In ultra-wide-angle high-pixel mode, the actual details are similar to everyone (mainly the difference in noise reduction and sharpening strength), but the Xiaomi 13U has a larger viewing angle.
On the telephoto side, OPPO's 2.7x IMX890 telephoto naturally crushes the Xiaomi 13 Ultra's physical 2.6x telephoto (daily interpolation to 3x 12.5 million pixels).
On the main camera side, the Find X7 Ultra's main camera (including high-pixel mode) has a resolution close to that of its predecessor, and it is still the most meaty in its class. Coupled with the unfocused high-pixel mode, the gap is widened. The actual detail of the main camera's high-pixel mode is that the Samsung S23U's 200 million pixel mode is stronger, but not much ahead of the IMX989.