The image aspect has always been the "place where the soldiers must be divided" of the major manufacturers, the radical hardware, the extreme optimization of the algorithm, in order to compete for the king of the image flagship, each major manufacturer has its own magic, which has created a different style. With the user's shooting needs, now the test of whether a flagship is good to take pictures is not only to see portraits and scenes, but also to see the performance of the telephoto segment has become a reference factor.
Take the most hotly discussed topic of "concert artifact" as an example, the international first brother Samsung S23 Ultra, the domestic flagship Huawei Mate 60 Pro+, vivo X100 Pro, OPPO Find X7 Ultra, who can be more qualified for this title?
（从左到右：三星S23 Ultra、华为Mate60 Pro+、vivo X100 Pro、OPPO Find X7 Ultra）
Let's take a look at the first set of samples, the logo pattern of the distant view at 100x zoom. The telephoto segment has always been Samsung's advantage,And judging from the first sample, it is true,The resolution is sufficient,The clarity of the LOGO pattern is guaranteed,The overall effect is still good,The fly in the ointment is that there is a blurred smearing feeling at the edge of the letters,How much affects the perception。
Looking at the domestic flagship camp again, the first impression of Huawei Mate 6 Pro+ is that it has a strong sense of glare, there is light overflow, and the clarity is slightly lower, compared to vivo X100 Pro, there is less glare and smearing, Huawei's algorithm optimization still has room for improvement.
Personally, I like OPPO's performance the most,After a comparison,Find X7 Ultra's look is indeed more pleasing,The clarity is in place,And it suppresses the LOGO reflection very well,The color transition is obviously soft,The most important thing is that the blur of the edge of the letter is almost negligible,The close-up lens of the equivalent 135mm focal length is really extraordinary。
Let's look at the comparison of the second set of samples, which is also a letter LOGO, but the difference is that this time the gap is more obvious. In the four sample shots, the Huawei Mate 60 Pro+'s algorithm fails to restore the details of the letters, with the light strip in the middle of the letters almost blurred, while the vivo X100 Pro is slightly stronger, and although it has a slight smear feeling, at least the light strip details can be seen.
And the better performance should be Samsung and OPPO, not only can restore the close-up details, but also suppress the highlight part, the difference between the two is mainly in style. The Samsung is a little blurry, favoring more natural images, while the Find X7 Ultra is visible throughout the image with little to no noticeable noise, and the background details are handled just right, and the overall color feedback is soft and comfortable.
After two rounds of comparison,I believe you have a definite number on whose performance is the best,Huawei Mate 60 Pro+Limited by hardware and algorithm optimization,There is indeed room for improvement in the performance of the telephoto end,The one that pleases the eye should be the Samsung S23 Ultra and Find X7 Ultra,Both are strong in the telephoto segment,S23 Ultra is stronger than the 10x periscope telephoto lens,Find X7 The Ultra is a more aggressive dual periscope telephoto structure, with a 65mm-equivalent portrait lens and a 135mm-equivalent close-up lens, which does have an advantage in hardware stacking.
Thanks to the native 6x periscope telephoto lens and the new super light and shadow image system, the Find X7 Ultra can still restore the details and contours after 100x zoom, and the color control is also just right, which is more biased towards the real effect of the human eye. I have to say that the top positioning of the dual periscope telephoto lens is OPPO is the right one.
On the whole, the performance of the above four flagships can only be said to have their own characteristics, after all, it is the limit of 100x zoom, each flagship has taken out its own best performance, the difference is the tone style and restoration algorithm, which mobile phone do you prefer to shoot the effect?