I've been playing Toutiao for a while, and I often see similar words, saying that 2k is not high, and if it is low, it will eventually be eliminated by 4k. Shouldn't the recommended display refer to the budget,And graphics card configuration?Brainless recommendation4K is either stupid or bad, right?Although it is said that at this stage, the high brush 4K display has dropped to two thousand or even lower,But the color of this display,Response time,And mold,are inferior to the same price2K display,I think this kind of"Youth version","Early version" The 4K display is even faster than the top 2K display, because they themselves are the remnant version, and now the display iteration speed is very fast, this kind of 4K with a lot of slots I think you will still want to replace it after you use it for a year.
At this stage, there are almost no 4K resources on domestic streaming media platforms,If you want to watch 4K movies, you have to go to various websites to download them,A movie 60-70G,The operation is extremely cumbersome,If you just watch Tencent,Station B,It's all 1080P,And I personally think that it is impossible for domestic software to support 4K in a short period of time,So 4K can currently fully surpass 2K The use scenario is only in the game field, right? 2K to replace 4K is also a bit premature, right?And various display manufacturers are still launching 2K high-end displays, which shows that 2K still has a long life cycle, having said so much, someone must ask me, how to choose2K and 4K, my opinion
If you have a monitor budget of more than 3000, please choose a 4K monitor without a brain, Samsung, LG, choose whatever you want, if not, there is no problem with choosing a good 2K, if your graphics card is 4080, choose a 4K monitor without a brain, if it is 70ti, look at your display budget, if 70 and below, then I estimate that your display budget must be less than 3,000, you must be looking at the high brush of about 2,000 now4K, the characteristics of this type of display are, the characteristics of this type of display are, second- and third-line brands, color performance tuning, mold workmanship, after-sales are not as good as 2K, it depends on how you choose
The budget is small, simple and rude, 1080P monitor with a graphics card within 2000, basically all killed
You can say he's mushy, but his compatibility is beyond doubt
---------------------
The budget is enough, and the big card 4K144 is direct
The graphics card can also keep up
---------------------
It's sandwiched in the middle
1080 is definitely not to be looked down upon
4K, and dissatisfied
Choose a 4K60 office monitor, and unwillingly
The niche 4K144 is unreliable
The big brand 4K144 is expensive
Then obviously, look inside the 2K high brush
Why do I recommend a 3,000 budget 4K,Because this has reached the performance and experience that a 4K display should have,In the next few years,3000 budget monitors will become the object of imitation of second- and third-line displays in the industry,And the current 2,000 and below4K,It's just a compromise to cater to some people
It's particularly funny to look at the web page.,2010Changed to 1080P at that time, I changed to read a large blank space on the left and right of the online novel,The font is still relatively small,The effect is far less than the previous positive screen19Inch1280X1024。
Thanks to the development of mobile phones and the malaise of PC, at this stage, except for a very few websites, even if Sina, 163, China.com, and other large portals are essentially within 1280 width, Baidu Tieba is only 760 horizontal length under the full screen, that is to say, on 1280X1024, it can be perfectly viewed95% of the web pages, 2K can be double-opened left and right web pages and perfectly displayed. 4K can indeed be opened more, but if you really open more, can you still see clearly? Turning on zoom will cause many software UI matches abnormally and produce blurry or pictures that are too small.
I have to admit it,4K is used to play games,Since it's a game,The graphics card is another big head,32Inch4K really doesn't need to scale,But the viewing distance is not farther,You can't do a full screen at a glance,It's more tiring to use。 Zooming out has to consider the depth of the table, the distance between the walls, the size and placement of the speakers, and a whole host of issues to consider. It doesn't matter if your room is infinitely large, but most people, or most standard computer desks, are limited. These problems to solve are far from being as simple as a 4K monitor.
In fact, what many people need is not 4K, but the new technology that comes with 4K
In fact2K is currently the most suitable,1080p are too mushy,4K and only high-end graphics cards can afford it,General graphics cards dare not pull up the picture quality,Playing a fps game is hanged and beaten,Naraka is slower than people,And 4kThe display of high brush is very expensive,Unless you just play a stand-alone machine,It is not recommended that the general friends of the graphics card go directly to the 4k。