I strongly disagree with Professor Dai Xu's viewpoint! Alibaba went public in the United States, and its market value has been rising for the first ten years. In Alibaba's shareholding structure, Japanese capital accounts for 34.6%,

I strongly disagree with Professor Dai Xu's viewpoint! Alibaba went public in the United States, and its market value has been rising for the first ten years. In Alibaba's shareholding structure, Japanese capital accounts for 34.6%, U.S. capital accounts for 22.4%, and U.S. and Japanese capital together account for 57%. Professor Dai Xu believes that Alibaba's achievements have been shared with Japanese and Americans.

I strongly disagree! Alibaba's main business is in China, and Alibaba's employees are almost Chinese, who have promoted the development of China's business and technology, and promoted China's economic and social reform. Alibaba has promoted China's integration with the rest of the world, greatly reducing the constraints of the official position on the economy.

Then, compared with listed companies in China, although listed in China, most of the domestic investors have suffered heavy losses and cannot share the dividends of enterprise development. Moreover, the performance of many companies has changed after listing, and major shareholders and the creation team have reduced their holdings, even at the expense of violating regulations. Leave the mess to the Chinese stock market and the Chinese retail investors!

Professor Dai Xu should not criticize Alibaba, he is in the wrong position. If he is a professor with a conscience, should he promote the healthy development of China's capital market?