There have been disputes in Chinese basketball competitions again, which can be said to have set off new waves after taking over the Chinese football turmoil. As we all know, Chinese football has long been plagued by corruption and internal strife, and the situation tends to improve, and the Football Association is focusing on reform and anti-corruption work has achieved remarkable results. Similarly, Chinese basketball should also learn from this experience and carry out self-rectification.
In recent years, Chinese basketball has encountered many difficulties, including collusion between players and referees, erosion of commercial interests, and the introduction of foreign players. These factors not only weaken the fairness and competitive advantage of basketball activities, but also reduce the enthusiasm and confidence of the public in basketball. In order to reshape the image of Chinese basketball, there is an urgent need for an anti-corruption reform campaign.
We need to strive to build a clear set of rules and regulations for the basketball league to achieve objectivity and fairness in the game, referees need to be independent and not affected by any interference or adverse factors, and at the same time, we should also establish a regulatory system with clear rights and responsibilities to prohibit risky cheating. In addition, all sectors should be aware that basketball activities should be dominated by sports and the spirit of competition, and commercial interests should not be blinded.
The introduction of foreign players is also worth paying attention to. It is true that the introduction of capable foreign players will help improve the level of basketball in our country, but if they participate in the game by acquiring nationality, it is obviously contrary to the principle of fair competition in sports. It is advisable to improve the relevant naturalization requirements to ensure that foreign players are recruited on the basis of their true talent and strength, rather than on the basis of money or power alone.
In the Chinese basketball circle, the topic that has attracted widespread attention is the wonderful matchup between the Liaoning men's basketball team and the Zhejiang Guangsha team. Unfortunately, this match was not only about the score contest, but also about the referee's two controversial rulings, which caused deep concern. For Liao Basket, the absence of Zhao Jiwei and Guo Allen undoubtedly brought great challenges to the team. Of course, winning and losing is a common thing in the military, and we can understand it. However, the referee's controversial decision twice is indeed worth pondering, is it really fair?
This has also caused questions and worries among fans and friends. If the referee's ruling attitude continues, it may have a profound impact on the entire Chinese basketball community. The core value of competitive sports is fair competition, and the qualifications and impartiality of referees are the basic guarantee for managing the order of the game and protecting the rights and interests of both parties. If the referee is too biased, it will inevitably undermine the fairness of the game and damage the trust and support of fans in basketball.
In the CBA league, controversial decisions often cause heated discussions. This time, the focus focused on a wonderful contest between the Liaoning team and the Guangsha team, and one of the controversial penalties instantly detonated the heated discussion among the fans. The game has entered the white-hot stage, and the Liaoning team still leads the Guangsha team 67-65 by virtue of its strength. At the critical moment, Liaoning player Fogg made a rather beautiful tackle and successfully controlled the ball.
Unexpectedly, the referee immediately awarded him a foul. The tackle was impeccable from every angle. Fogg was furious and bewildered by the referee's decision. He couldn't bear to be mistaken for a foul on a brilliant tackle, which undoubtedly greatly dampened his motivation. He crashed and smashed the ball to the ground in anger and let out a deafening scolding that stunned the crowd.
The most strange thing is that the referee actually added a technical foul to Fogg, which further exacerbated the frustration of the players and fans. This mistake not only caused Liaoning to miss an opportunity to steal the ball, but also created an additional free throw opportunity for Guangsha. The "whistle" storm made the atmosphere of the game more tense and caused heated debates among the fans. Everyone expressed their strong dissatisfaction with the penalty and questioned the professionalism of the referee.
There was no doubt that the misjudgment had a significant impact on the outcome of the game, as well as a negative impact on the players' performances. However, where there is competition, there must be winners and losers, and controversial penalties cannot be completely avoided. In this world of passion and challenge, referees are also ordinary people, and misunderstandings are inevitable. However, it is worth affirming that this controversial penalty will surely become a typical case in people's memory, adding more mystery to the CBA league.
The CBA Finals has always been the focus of change on the court, and any decision by the referee may affect the trend of the entire game. A quick counterattack in an instant, when the Liaoning team and the Zhejiang Guangsha team clashed fiercely, Fogg showed strong stealing skills and successfully regained the ball, and the team seemed to see the dawn of victory. If the counterattack is successful, the score of only two points can be quickly stretched to four points, and the advantage of the Liaoning team is even more obvious.
However, the dramatic turn of events came at this critical juncture, when the referee's whistle blew, and this time the ruling was not given to Ferg for the steal, nor for the player who made the layup, but instead to give the Cantons a foul and technical foul. Such a verdict deeply shocked the Liaoning team, and they were puzzled, because judging from the situation on the scene, the foul was not obvious.
Despite the dissent, the players and coaches of the Liaoning team expressed their dissatisfaction with the verdict, believing that it was essentially a gift to the Guangsha team with three points. Because regardless of the foul or technical foul, the opponent will be given points. The three points had a profound impact on the outcome of the game, and the original advantage was lost. Since then, the referee's judgment has become more and more inclined to the Zhejiang Guangsha team, which made the Liaoning team feel unfair, and even suspected the referee's deliberate partiality.
Such an unfair penalty put the Liaoning team in a difficult situation, and the morale was greatly damaged, and it also directly affected the performance of the game. On the stage of the CBA, a controversial miscalculation in the continental basketball league, has received widespread attention. At that time, Sun Minghui and Yu Zechen sparked a dispute in a switch between offense and defense. We noticed that Sun Minghui seemed to have accidentally pushed Yu Zechen in the process of getting in the position, but the referee did not give a timely penalty for this, which further escalated the incident.
Faced with such injustice, Yu Zechen immediately appealed to the referee. He clearly complained to the referee with a powerful gesture: "Referee, Sun Minghui did elbow just now, why didn't he blow it?" It is worth noting that the distance between the referee and them was only three meters at this time, but he ignored it. This caused deep confusion: if the referee had corrected it in time, this unnecessary dispute might have been avoided.
However, with regard to the referee's mistake, we can't help but ask: who is to blame for this, is it the referee's negligence in his duties, or is it a misjudgment of the situation? Needless to say, a fair and unbiased decision plays a pivotal role in the smooth running of the game. It is hoped that in future matches, the referee will be able to perform the work more accurately and avoid such controversial decisions.
Yesterday's CBA arena saw a controversial penalty decision. During the fast attack of the Liaoning team, the opponent's suspected foul action was not discovered by the referee. Indeed, the move was hidden, but should the referee ignore it? Many fans and experts have questioned the incident. Some people wonder if the referee really didn't see it clearly, or was he deliberately biased?
If the former is the case, it is hoped that the league will conduct a detailed review of Choi Zhexiong's professionalism in the decision, which undoubtedly constitutes his fault in his work, and if the latter is more serious, it is of a more serious nature, implying that the referee is biased and treats certain teams unfairly. In the face of this potentially hidden black whistle phenomenon, fans have expressed their indignation.
Some netizens shouted: "Basketball events should be moved from CCTV5 to CCTV1!", "Mr. Yao Ming, please pay attention to these lawless referees!" "As we all know, referees No. 38 and No. 106 turn a blind eye to everything. "Can Yao Ming release the referee report of the game? Once Liaoning has the advantage, the referee will start to blow the penalty for Liaoning!" The results and penalties of this game will undoubtedly have an impact on the CBA league. The impartiality and professionalism of referees must be subject to stricter supervision; On the other hand, as the regulator of the league, Yao Ming and the CBA should also conduct an in-depth investigation to maintain the fairness and impartiality of the competition.