After a devastating earthquake struck Ishikawa Prefecture in Japan, a TV host made a "retribution" speech and was subsequently suspended for investigation, but his follower count surged by more than 7 million in a short period of time. The incident provoked a strong online reaction, and public opinion was markedly polarized. In the face of this incident, how can we take a rational attitude toward issues such as public opinion on the Internet, the limits of freedom of speech, and the social responsibilities of public figures? This is a topic worthy of deep consideration by the whole society.
The moderator posted controversial remarks and was suspended for investigation
On January 1, a strong earthquake of magnitude 7.6 struck Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. A Weibo user who is verified as "host Cheng Hao" shared the video on the platform, with the title "Retribution: A 7.4-magnitude earthquake struck Japan!"
The host is a host of Hainan Radio and Television. Subsequently, Hainan Radio and Television Station issued a statement saying that it had suspended the host's work and was verifying his remarks.
His remarks have attracted widespread attention and heated discussions on the Internet. Some agree with him as representing the views of ordinary people, while others accuse him of being unsympathetic and irresponsible in times of disaster for others.
After the turmoil, the host's fans increased significantly, and polarized comments were rampant on the Internet
After the suspension investigation, the host's Douyin followers increased from more than 600,000 to more than 8 million in just a few days.
A large number of netizens supported the host on the Internet, and some comments also said that Hainan TV's handling was improper and not patriotic enough. There is also a view that the moderator is expressing public opinion and that telling the truth should not be punished.
But there are also views that oppose the remarks of the moderator, arguing that he lacks empathy. There is an opinion that this is a manifestation of overly strong nationalist sentiment. Polarizing rhetoric continues to escalate online.
We need to look at this rationally
Wang Gang, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said: "The responsibility of speech is heavy, and we should look at this matter with a more rational eye. ”
This incident shows that the mainland's nationalism and patriotic sentiments need to be further strengthened and improved, and it is very important to look at them rationally.
As a public figure, the moderator's words and deeds have a strong influence, and he should be cautious in his remarks and assume social responsibility. But at the same time, we should respect the individual's freedom of expression and engage in rational discussion and disagreement.
This incident reflects the two-sided nature of online public opinion. We need to create an environment for rational discussion, not just expand it.
Television outlets need to take into account procedural justice and provide appropriate remedies, rather than unrestricted suppression of dissenting speech.
How to communicate rationally and tolerate differences
"In this era, we need to learn how to communicate rationally and tolerate differences. ”
This controversial incident reflects the public's divergence in historical understanding and practical interests.
In the electronic age, the importance of encouraging rational speech and curbing irresponsible voices is undeniable. At the same time, it is also necessary to promote understanding and tolerance between different points of view.
Individuals, the media and regulators should assume their social responsibilities, express themselves rationally, and guide the public to form open and rational values.
Summary and outlook
The incident sparked controversy and raised numerous social issues. However, we need to approach disputes sensibly and actively build positive interactions. Everyone has a responsibility to speak out, and the media has a responsibility to do it. While it is important to appropriately limit extremist speech, it is also important to respect every voice. Rational communication and acceptance of differences are the keys to moving society forward.
What are the key points of thinking about this incident? What do you think about the positive and negative sides of online public opinion? Welcome to share your views in the comment area, and I also hope that you will like and share this article to jointly create a rational and harmonious cyberspace!