Before reading the article, please click "Follow" to facilitate your follow-up discussion and sharing, thank you for your support I will accompany you every day.
Text/Editor|The duck who loves entertainment
Preface
In this digital age, when Xiao Chenghao, an internet celebrity with more than 7 million followers, is in the spotlight for his controversial comments on the earthquake in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan, we can't help but ask: how should a public figure balance personal emotions and social responsibility when expressing his own opinions? How can we find the right boundary between respecting facts and expressing emotions in the face of international disasters?
Recently, online celebrity Xiao Chenghao has become the focus of heated discussions among many netizens because of his controversial remarks on a well-known short video platform. With his unique perspective and outspoken style, Xiao Chenghao has more than 7 million followers on the platform and often gives his opinion on hot topics in society.
The 7.6 magnitude earthquake that struck Ishikawa Prefecture on January 1, 2024, killing at least 62 people, not only had a devastating impact on the lives of local residents, but also dealt a severe blow to the local economy. In the aftermath of the disaster, Xiao Chenghao posted a video expressing his views on the matter. In the video, he makes the controversial point that the earthquake is Japan's retribution. He mentioned that the reason why Japan suffered such a disaster at the beginning of the new year was because of some of their previous actions, such as the nuclear sewage discharge incident in 2023.
The next developments are interesting, with internet personality Xiao Chenghao suffering a career setback for his controversial comments about the earthquake in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan. Xiao Chenghao, a figure with more than 7 million followers on a well-known short-form video platform, was forced to suspend work because of his views on the earthquake. The earthquake killed at least 62 people and had a major impact on Japan's local economy.
Xiao Chenghao's view in the video that the disaster was a controversial event in Japan's history, such as the "retribution" for the discharge of nuclear sewage in 2023, has sparked a fierce reaction from public opinion. Although Xiao Chenghao later deleted the video, his remarks have already attracted widespread attention and led to a temporary shutdown of his work.
Surprisingly, this decision has aroused opposition from many netizens. They believe that Xiao Chenghao's remarks, although sharp, should not be a reason to stop his work. These supporters argue that while Xiao Chenghao's views may be controversial, expressing one's views is part of freedom of expression and should be respected.
Xiao Chenghao's argument in his video that the earthquake in Ishikawa Prefecture in Japan is a cause for karma is rooted in the controversy over the way the Japanese government handles nuclear wastewater. Although his view has been questioned by some viewers about its reasonableness, it also reflects widespread dissatisfaction with the Japanese government's decision-making. The Japanese government's decision to discharge the Fukushima nuclear power plant into the sea has persisted despite widespread international opposition.
In Xiao Chenghao's video, he emphasized the Japanese government's attitude in the decision-making process, arguing that it has shown a solitary attitude despite the opposition of the international community. He also mentioned that the Japanese government may have even resorted to improper means in order to gain support for this decision, in order to win the endorsement of some international organizations and countries.
While the remarks expressed some dissatisfaction with the Japanese government's handling of the nuclear sewage problem, the way in which it directly linked natural disasters to man-made actions has sparked widespread controversy. This view is seen by some as lacking scientific basis and rationality, and is also considered to ignore the nature of earthquakes as natural phenomena.
Xiao Chenghao's incident not only shows his personal views and expressions on social events, but also reflects the public's concern and criticism of government decision-making. It has also led to reflection on how to maintain a rational and scientific attitude in public discourse. With the increasing importance of social media platforms in disseminating information, how to balance personal expression and social responsibility has become a topic worth exploring in depth.
In this context, Xiao Chenghao's case has become a compelling point of discussion, not only about individual freedom of expression and boundaries, but also about the complex interplay between government decision-making and the response of the international community in the context of globalization. This incident is not only a controversy over individual speech, but also a case study of the global environment, international relations, and how the public understands and engages with these important issues.
While Xiao Chenghao's incident continued to spark heated discussions on the Internet, Hu Xijin, a well-known media figure, also participated in the discussion. He said in public that he agreed with Hainan TV's decision to suspend Xiao Chenghao's work and expressed his views on the matter.
Hu Xijin pointed out that as a public figure, Xiao Chenghao should be more cautious when publishing sensitive topics such as "retribution". He believes that although ordinary people can have more freedom to express their personal emotions, Xiao Chenghao, as an influential media person, should be responsible for his public statement.
Hu Xijin did not completely deny Xiao Chenghao's future opportunities. He suggested that Xiao Chenghao should have a chance to return to the public eye if he could engage in deep self-reflection and sincerely commit to restraining him in public statements in the future. Hu Xijin's point of view provides Xiao Chenghao with the possibility of correction and comeback to a certain extent.
This incident once again highlights the importance of the impact of public figures' words on society in today's society. With the rise of social media platforms, the rhetoric of public figures can not only spread quickly, but also spark widespread social discussion. They need to be more cautious in expressing their opinions in public, and at the same time, they need to take on the corresponding social responsibility.
Hu's views have also sparked further debate on the balance between freedom of expression and public responsibility. This discussion is not only about Xiao Chenghao's personal remarks, but also about the issues that all public figures should consider when using their influence. These discussions reflect society's growing exploration and emphasis on the boundaries of freedom of expression and public responsibility, as well as the public's sensitivity and response to information and speech in the digital age.
The controversy surrounding Xiao Chenghao's remarks intensified, and the views were divided into two camps. On the one hand, there is a part of the population that firmly supports Xiao Chenghao's position. They believe that as a Chinese citizen, Xiao Chenghao has shown due emotion and courage, and his remarks are nothing more than a direct expression of his true thoughts. These supporters emphasize that what Xiao Chenghao said is not groundless, but based on the intuitive feeling of real events. The "facts" they refer to are referring to the 7.4 magnitude earthquake that struck Japan at the beginning of the new year, and the shadow and suffering that this disaster brought to the Japanese people and country. They questioned how the Japanese people could remain cheerful in the face of such a devastating disaster.
Proponents of this view believe that Xiao Chenghao, as a public figure, has the right to express his views and emotions, especially in the face of major events involving national and national feelings. They believe that even though his expression may have a certain emotional overtone, this does not prevent the factual and emotional truth contained in his speech.
Such a view has also triggered a strong reaction on the other side. The opposing side believes that no matter which country it is, it should maintain basic compassion and humanitarian care in the face of natural disasters. They believe that linking natural disasters to political or historical issues is not only inappropriate but also lacks basic respect for the affected populations.
The controversy surrounding Xiao Chenghao's remarks not only touches on the boundaries between personal expression and public responsibility, but also touches on deep reflections on history, politics and international relations. As the discussion progressed, more voices joined the debate, bringing the topic to the forefront of society's attention, reflecting the complex attitudes of society regarding public discourse, national identity, and cultural sensitivities.
The current situation shows that Xiao Chenghao's remarks have been clearly marked by officials as "inappropriate speech". There seems to be a difference between the views of the people and the official positions on this issue. The opinions of ordinary people and populist tendencies often do not fully coincide with official views, and this phenomenon is particularly evident in Xiao Chenghao's case.
While there is a heated debate about Xiao Chenghao's remarks, public opinion and populism are intertwined in this debate, which poses a challenge to the correct guidance of public opinion. Failure to properly distinguish between public opinion and populism, and to properly handle public reactions to the event, could exacerbate social antagonism and even provoke extreme populist sentiments.
Against this backdrop, dealing with the public's differing reactions to Xiao Chenghao's remarks becomes particularly complex. On the one hand, it is necessary to take seriously and respect the opinions of the people, especially those that are reasonable and constructive. On the other hand, there is also a need to be vigilant and prevent the over-fermentation of populist sentiment, which can lead to irrational and radical environments for dialogue and debate.
In discussing the earthquake in Japan, the primary and central focus should be on compassion and support for the affected people, rather than the venting of personal feelings or historical grievances. In the face of such natural disasters, it is particularly important to show the care and sympathy of the sense of community with a shared future for mankind. As members of society, our response should transcend borders and ethnicities, and our focus should be on the safety and well-being of the people living in the affected areas.
In the event of the earthquake, some individuals may have made inappropriate remarks in the face of the disaster due to historical reasons or national sentiments. However, this attitude runs counter to the traditional virtues of compassion, fraternity and humanistic care advocated by the Chinese nation. Schadenfreude not only does not reflect the spirit of humanitarianism, but can also exacerbate misunderstandings and contradictions among the world.
In the face of natural disasters such as the earthquake in Japan, it is necessary to show humanitarian care and support without borders. We should remember that it is the responsibility of every citizen to maintain a basic humanitarian attitude in the event of a disaster in any country. This not only reflects the moral quality of the individual, but also reflects the international image and cultural accomplishment of a country.
Therefore, when discussing such incidents, we should focus on how to provide assistance, show compassion and promote international understanding and solidarity. In this way, we will not only help those who have suffered from disasters, but also promote mutual understanding and respect between different cultures and nations. This kind of attitude and behavior is truly in line with the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind, and it is also the modern embodiment of the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation.