Title: Cross-Strait Trade Adjustment: The Mainland's Precise Policy, the Democratic Progressive Party's Response Triggers Controversy
Body:
In the latest cross-strait economic exchanges, the mainland announced an important policy adjustment, that is, the abolition of some projects that originally enjoyed preferential tariffs under the Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). This decision will undoubtedly affect the pattern of trade between the two sides of the strait. At the same time, to the delight of fish farmers, the mainland has also announced that it will reopen the import market of grouper from Taiwan, bringing a ray of hope to Taiwanese fishermen.
It is reported that this policy adjustment is not without a trace. The mainland side has stressed on many occasions that it should make corresponding policy decisions on the basis of upholding the consensus of '92 and safeguarding the peaceful development of cross-strait relations. A spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office pointed out: "We have always believed that compatriots on both sides of the strait are a family linked by blood, but all affairs must be conducted under the premise of mutual respect, fairness and reasonableness. ”
However, the DPP has shown obvious dissatisfaction with the mainland's decision. They have criticized the removal of tariff preferences for some items as a "unilateral change in the status quo". However, in the eyes of many onlookers, the DPP's approach of "repeating the same old tune" seems to ignore a core issue - in the context of the current complex and volatile international situation, it is the right and duty of every responsible government to fine-tune policies in a timely manner.
What is even more noteworthy is that after the mainland resumed the import of grouper from Taiwan, many Taiwanese fishermen expressed a positive attitude. Su Qingquan, a representative of the Kuomintang, once said with emotion: "This is really good news for our hard-working fishermen. "It is appropriate to reflect that the mainland is not only concerned about the macroeconomic layout, but also about the livelihood and feelings of the people.
Of course, in the process of strengthening cross-strait economic ties and enhancing mutual trust and mutual benefit, it is not always calm. However, history has proven that as long as we persist in communication and cooperation and jointly seek a convergence of interests and the greatest common divisor, cross-strait relations will be able to move forward steadily.
To sum up, in today's era of globalization and the in-depth development of the regionalized economy, the two sides of the strait need to be more flexible, open and forward-looking to face challenges and opportunities. The policy changes will also encourage both sides to pay more attention to practical benefits and long-term planning, and in this way, strengthen their deep and growing partnership.
As for some voices that cling to preconceived notions and fail to make correct judgments and choices in a timely manner, they may be eliminated by the tide of history. After all, in safeguarding the common well-being of the two sides of the strait and promoting regional stability and development, more rational, objective and constructive participants and contributors are needed.