Zhu Dan revealed the experience of being deceived, and his friend Tian Xiaomi resolutely refuted it and filed legal proceedings
Zhu Dan, a well-known host, recently revealed a shocking experience on a show, saying that he was deceived by a close friend, causing all his savings to disappear overnight. However, this statement caused an uproar on social platforms. Tian Xiaomi, a friend named by Zhu Dan, responded publicly on social media, firmly denying Zhu Dan's accusations and claiming that he had entrusted a lawyer to file a lawsuit against Zhu Dan.
Tian Xiaomi said in response that she and Zhu Dan had a deep friendship, but later the relationship was estranged due to some differences. She vehemently denied that she had ever deceived Zhu Dan or used her trust to commit any form of fraud. Tian Xiaomi emphasized that she was angry and disappointed by Zhu Dan's remarks on the show, and decided to protect her rights and interests through legal means.
This incident not only plunged the two parties into a whirlpool of public opinion, but also sparked public speculation about the true motives of both parties. Some netizens believe that this may be a hype to attract public attention, while others believe that it may involve more complex legal disputes and personal feuds.
In this turmoil, in addition to the statements and disputes of both parties, other legal issues related to companies and individuals were also involved. According to reports, the company involved, Beijing Pincheng Yuehui Culture Communication Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Beijing Danfeng Fashion Media Culture Development Co., Ltd.), was established in August 2010 with a registered capital of 3 million yuan. The company was listed as a dishonest person subject to execution (Lao Lai) for failing to pay Zhu Dan's 16 million yuan advance, and was restricted from high consumption. At the same time, the company also has other legal disputes and abnormal business conditions.
There has been a lot of public discussion about the truth of this turmoil and the real motives of both sides. Some believe that this may be a hype between the two sides for interests and attention. Others believe that it could be a complex legal dispute, with both sides arguing and the truth elusive.