#文章首发挑战赛#
Sue Xinhua Dictionary?Won't it be another team hype, a routine of self-media, first Bo traffic and then bring goods, right?
This topic will be discussed later, but let's take a look at a very disgusting incident in the past two days.
On the day of the National Memorial Day, an incredible thing happened in Zhejiang. A man pasted the Japanese flag logo on the back of his clothes and swaggered through the street, attracting many citizens to watch and accuse, and some people asked him to take off the Japanese flag on the spot, but the man said:
I love Japan, so what's wrong with wearing the Japanese flag?
Someone asked: What day is today, you actually wear the Japanese flag?
The man said: What does the National Memorial Day have to do with me?
The police patiently persuaded the man to take off the national flag, but the man did not take it seriously at all; finally under the pressure of the police, he reluctantly took off the picture of the Japanese flag, but he said: I will wear it in a few days!
What kind of problem does this reflect? Isn't it precisely our patriotic education that has gone wrong?
And the student textbook, Xinhua Dictionary, is the key to the problem of patriotic education, so when Teacher Qian and Teacher Liu sued Xinhua Dictionary, they quickly rushed to the hot search.
Whether it is blowing the whistle for the poisonous textbook or shouting for the poisonous dictionary, such people and behaviors are worthy of our respect, as some netizens said: You deserve to enjoy the temple!
I also took a general look at the opinions on this matter on the Internet, and it can be said that everyone is one-sided in support of Mr. Qian's lawsuit, some people support, and some people want to donate money to help them.
However, there are also some people who think that suing Xinhua Dictionary is purely a big fuss, and there are even people who slander, abuse and attack, how to attack, you can probably see it in my comment area later.
In the author's opinion, the negative impact caused by the problems in the Xinhua dictionary includes but is not limited to the following four types:
Of course, the following is only my personal opinion, and it is not an over-interpretation
First, hatred of the country.
We see the example sentence of the word "don't" cited by the plaintiff is: a pistol pinned to his waist.
Yesterday, I specifically asked my third-grader what he thought of "having a pistol in his waist"?
The child asked me, "Who can carry a gun in their waist?"
I said: In our country, ordinary people are forbidden to carry guns, so only special personnel such as military and police soldiers can carry guns.
The child asked, "Why do they want to stop shooting?" Why do you want to shoot people with guns when they don't have guns and bad guys don't have guns?
I replied: The use of guns is an emergency measure taken in the case of criminals committing crimes and bad people doing evil.
Child: If you make a mistake, you can correct it, didn't the teacher teach us that it is still a good child to correct the mistake?
Of course, I couldn't explain to her more and more about the deeper reason, and she didn't understand it.
But from the simple dialogue, it can be seen that through the phrase "a gun pinned to the waist", what children associate with is not the heroism of the military and police team, but the image of bullying!
So if the PLA has a gun pinned to his waist in the illustration of Kenben, will the children ask: Who does the PLA uncle want to hit?
If we add the influence of a bad cultural atmosphere, it is easy for children to misunderstand that our soldiers are invading others, and our police are bullying ordinary people, and then hate our country.
Therefore, don't ignore this very small cultural incursion, a look, a word, a picture, can change a person's life, there are many such cases!
Second, hatred of parents
As a parent of two children, I raised my hands in favor of Mr. Qian suing Xinhua Dictionary because of the combination of the word "tired".
The child is small and has become a burden!
What is this? Isn't this a naked way to make children hate their parents? Isn't it indifferent and alienated from their families?
You know, these reference books are not used by parents, but by children?
When children know that their parents feel that they are a burden, how should their young minds deal with it?
Do you work harder to learn and Xi and strive not to be a burden to your parents? or break the jar and become a real burden? Or run away from your parents?
I think there are all of these situations.
Since parents can bring their children into this world, they will not see them as a burden, but as hope, a future!
What is the intention of instigating conflicts between children and parents in this way?
Disagree with your parents, hate your parents, and even go against your parents, and finally become a tool for others to use!
Look at how many juvenile delinquencies in reality, isn't it caused by bad family relationships?
In a word, you can decide a child's life, there is no doubt about it!
Third, destroy the three views
The most odious thing is that "playing with women" actually appeared in children's reference books, what is the difference between this and Cao Wenxuan's pornographic children's books?
In the definition, it is shown that "to play" means "to tease", but does not the meaning of teasing mean to play, to tease? Aren't these two completely opposite words?
Can I say "I played with the dictionary editor's sister" to mean "I played with the dictionary editor's sister"?
To put it mildly, this is misleading, and to put it seriously, this is to secretly destroy the three views of the Chinese people.
When a boy asks his mother, what does it mean to play with women?
Isn't this an insult to women?
When a girl asks her father, what does it mean to play with women?
Does this cause children to hate men?
We see some dictionary combinations of words, all of which have a distinction between positive and derogatory meanings, but this word is not marked at all?
So for girls, will it cause personality insults? Isn't the prevalence of women's boxing today because of the invasion of these cultures?
Therefore, as the majority of female compatriots, we must support the act of prosecuting Xinhua Dictionary and safeguard our dignity and rights.
Fourth, forget history
I've looked up several versions of the dictionary, and they don't have the word 倭寇.
The word 倭 is actually synonymous with Japan, and there are three interpretations of Kou: 1. Robbers or foreign invaders (also referred to as enemies) (invading enemies). 2. The enemy comes to invade 3. Surname.
Obviously, in the word Wako, Kou means robber, invader.
There is no doubt that whether it is the Ming Dynasty or the Qing Dynasty, the ancestors of the Chinese nation did not go to Japan to burn, kill and loot, but they ran to our territory to establish the so-called Greater East Asia Co-prosperity, to put it bluntly, it is infiltration and then occupation?
Of course, in the present era of peace, we should not engage in hostility and discrimination in advocating global integration, but we should not forget history, and forgetting is not tantamount to betrayal? What qualifications do we have to forget history for our revolutionary predecessors who shed their blood and spill their heads?
Aren't they all advocating facing history squarely? Why is it our turn to try to make us forget our feud? Isn't this hurting the national feelings of the Chinese people?
Of course, the process of relying on textbooks to make us forget history is too slow and the effect is too poor, so some people directly indoctrinate students in the classroom the phenomenon of forgetting history, or even distorting history.
The teacher at Shanghai Aurora College openly said to the students in class
"There is no data to support how many people were massacred by the invading Japanese army in Nanjing, 300,000 people. 300,000 people are roughly estimated from one person's notes, some estimate 3,000, some estimate 20,000, some estimate 500,000, and some estimate 70,000. ”
Liang Yanping, a professor at Hubei University, publicly denied the Nanjing Massacre, saying
"There were no 300,000 people in the Nanjing Massacre, there is no list, I will not admit it!"
Ma Licheng, editor-in-chief of the People's Daily, publicly released a new book "Japan Does Not Have to Apologize to China", an out-and-out Nanjing intellectual, who forgot his ancestors, openly denied the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the Nanjing Massacre, and said: The war will inevitably lead to sacrifices!
If little Japan does not invade us, where will the war come from?
Such people, I don't think it will be an isolated phenomenon, a lot of them in the network!
Fifth, cultural incursion
One thing to say, except for the case of the word 倭寇 being removed from the dictionary, I didn't find any other ones, because I didn't have a Xinhua dictionary at home, and my children's dictionaries were all purchased from bookstores.
Then it shows the seriousness of the matter even more!
Why is this the case that these poisonous textbooks are not mentioned in the reading materials circulating in the market, but are dictionaries designated and distributed by schools?
First, cultural invasion has infiltrated our core institutions, and as the editing and review of children's reference books, it is impossible not to see such a simple mistake, so it is no accident that such a phenomenon occurs!
Second, as a for-profit publishing house, even they know what works and what words can't, and they can avoid such mistakes. It can only be shown that cultural invasion is not just a matter of money, but a problem of sitting on that side of the ass!
Therefore, the black hand behind it should be strictly investigated!
Above, you can say that I am overinterpreting, but the problems involved in this cannot not exist, otherwise these "wrong at a glance" mistakes will never appear in the textbook!
Sue Xinhua Dictionary, can they win the case?
Regarding the problem of Xinhua dictionary, in fact, they are not the first to pay attention to and act, when some netizens pointed out the problem, the Guilin Procuratorate had its own joint Education Bureau, Market Supervision Administration, Education and Sports Bureau, etc., to check the local bookstore for problem readings and dictionaries.
Unfortunately, because the Guilin Procuratorate was forced to apologize to the public for allegedly misperforming its duties!
Please note here that the word "self" is used in the paperwork, which means to inspect the bookstore without the approval of the higher authorities.
Is it because the procuratorate should not have come forward in the inspection of the inspection? Or is there a mistake in the work of the procuratorate? Or is it not going through the process?
There is no need to delve into this problem, and I just want to give Mr. Qian a preventive shot in advance.
Now let's go back and discuss the issue mentioned at the beginning of the article, Mr. Qian sued Xinhua Dictionary, is it to blow the whistle for poisonous textbooks, or to pave the way for bringing goods?
I think it's too early to draw conclusions, but regardless of the outcome, they fired the first shot at patriotic education!
Write at the end:
I saw that at the recent Sino-Japanese exchange forum in Xiangshan, Beijing, Japanese scholar Masayuki Masuda publicly expressed his views:
Hold on to the thighs of the United States, step up the expansion of armaments, continue to form gangs, and contain the rise of China!
In Beijing, China, it is so rampant, who gave the confidence?
Look at one of our people, admiring the foreign, flattering, and shameless!
The Patriotic Education Law on January 1, 2024 is about to be a fact, I think the first thing is to start with school education first, and don't let poisonous textbooks, poisonous dictionaries, and poisonous teachers affect our education again!