Before reading the article, please click "Follow" to facilitate discussion and sharing. Authors will live up to expectations and create better content on time and in quantity.
Text: Ah Zhen Film and Television Entertainment
Edited by Ah Zhen Film and Television Entertainment
The beginning of the breaking point: After the broadcast of "Thrush", the audience questioned it
Recently, the highly anticipated spy war drama "Thrush" was broadcast on CCTV, but it aroused questions and dissatisfaction among the audience. The plot is full of loopholes, the characters are not performing well, especially the performance of the heroine Peng Xiaoran is controversial.
The audience said that the series deviated from the atmosphere of a spy war drama, more like an idol drama, and the silicone faces of the actors also became the reason for the audience's play. In this regard, many viewers suggested that the crew should consider more carefully in the selection of actors to avoid the negative impact of silicone faces on the series.
The plot is full of loopholes, and the audience is dissatisfied
In the plot of "Thrush", the audience found many loopholes and irrationalities. In terms of story setting, the relationship between the characters is complex, but there is no clear logical thread to connect them. Viewers said that this prevented them from engaging in the world of the series and making it difficult to create a sense of substitution.
In addition, the plot arrangement in the play has repeatedly puzzled the audience. The relationship between the characters changes abruptly, and the development of the plot lacks reasonable foreshadowing and advancement. This incoherent plot design makes the audience feel confused and disappointed.
The actor's silicone face became the reason for the audience to play
In addition to the problems of the plot, the audience generally believes that the silicone faces of the actors in "Thrush" also caused them great trouble.
Silicone face refers to the actor's facial appearance being altered through plastic surgery and cosmetic injections, etc., to make them look youthful and flawless. However, this kind of performance that excessively pursues appearance has caused the audience a strong sense of discomfort.
Viewers felt that the silicone face made the actors' expressions stiff and lacked realism, and could not accurately convey the emotions of the characters.
In tense and exciting spy war dramas, the audience often expects to see the actors show the inner world of the characters through superb performance skills. However, the silicone-faced actor was unable to meet this expectation, causing the audience to seriously question the quality of the series.
It is recommended that the crew carefully choose the actors to avoid the negative impact of silicone faces
In order to avoid the negative impact of silicone faces on the series, many viewers suggested that the crew be more cautious in the selection of actors. They believe that the appearance of the actor is not the only important factor, but also the acting skills and character shaping ability.
The audience wants to see actors who can really play the role and show the inner emotions of the character. I believe that only in this way can the series be more engaging and have a strong viewing attraction.
The producer of the series should listen to the audience
However, it remains to be seen whether the crew will adopt these suggestions. Perhaps, they will continue to insist on the choice of silicone face, pursuing the beauty and perfection of the surface.
However, viewers have begun to express their worries about whether this kind of performance will become a trend in the development of future dramas.
In the eyes of the audience, the quality and enjoyment of the episodes are the most important. No matter how strong the director is and how professional the production team is, if the plot is full of loopholes and the actors' silicone faces can't resonate, then it will be difficult for the series to succeed in the audience.
Conclusion: Audience questioning triggers a valuable opportunity for reflection
In short, the broadcast of "Thrush" sparked heated discussions among the audience about the plot and the choice of actors. Viewers expect the crew to listen carefully and make improvements in future series productions. Only in this way can we truly meet the expectations of the audience and create more wonderful works.
However, both the plot and the choice of actors are full of subjectivity and controversy. Perhaps, in the eyes of some audiences, the imperfection of "Thrush" is its appeal. In any case, this controversy has undoubtedly given the audience and the producer a valuable opportunity to reflect, and I hope that future episodes can better cater to the audience's tastes and create even better works!
The audience and the producer are divided on the issue of silicone face
However, on the issue of silicone faces, there is a clear disagreement between the audience and the producers. The audience believes that actors should impress people with their talent and authentic performances, rather than relying solely on physical perfection.
However, the crew may think that silicone faces are a way to enhance the viewing of the series. It is a matter of concern whether this disagreement will lead the producers of the series to continue to choose silicone-faced actors in future productions.
Only through in-depth discussions and balanced trade-offs can a better solution be found, allowing silicone faces to coexist with acting and truly meet the expectations of the audience. #Headline Creation Challenge##Winter Life Check-in Season#
(Special statement: The above content materials come from the Internet and do not represent the author's point of view.