"Thrush": The acting skills of the male and female protagonists are controversial, and the makeup of film and television dramas needs to be more careful

In that stormy era, spy war dramas can always attract the attention of the audience with their unique charm and immerse people in the tense and exciting plot. As a high-profile spy war drama, "Thrush" originally carried the audience's expectations and high expectations, however, as the plot progressed, it gradually made people feel an indescribable loss and disappointment.

In the play, the characters who should have been the focus of attention don't seem to show their charm as we would like. The heroine Peng Xiaoran, the actor who amazed us in "East Palace", seems to be bound in an unreal shell this time. Her performance became stiff and her expression was monolithic, as if she was shrouded in an invisible membrane that could not touch the soul of the character. This change makes us feel sorry and sorry for her.

And the image of the male protagonist is even more shocking. He is no longer the low-key and deep spy agent, but a "vase" shrouded in the aura of an idol. His hairstyle is always so meticulous, as if it always tells us about his delicacy and perfection. But behind this, we can't feel the calmness and calmness that we should have as a spy officer. This kind of idolization not only makes the audience feel that it is a play, but also makes people question the authenticity of this drama.

In addition to the choice of actors, the distortion of character creation is also a major failure of this show. In spy war dramas, the portrayal of characters should be close to history and credible. However, the characters in "The Thrush" seem too pompous and out of place in the context of the era. The heroine's tight suit, puff-sleeved shirt, and the actor's excessive hairspray style all make us feel an inexplicable sense of disobedience. This design not only failed to enhance the charm of the characters, but also made the audience find it difficult to accept.

When we recall that war-torn era, those brave and fearless spy agents did not hesitate to sacrifice their lives for the benefit of the country. Their image should be deep, understated, and full of wisdom. However, "Thrush" fails to present us with such an image, but instead allows us to see characters who are detached from reality and exaggerated and false. This kind of portrayal that deviates from history and reality not only disappoints us, but also makes us doubt the social value and significance of this drama.

As an audience, what we are looking forward to is a real, in-depth, and connotative spy war drama. We hope that through this drama, we can have a deeper understanding of the historical background and the fate of the characters in that special period. However, "Thrush" failed to meet this expectation. There are serious problems with the selection of actors and the creation of characters, which prevents us from feeling the real atmosphere and charm of the characters.

Therefore, we hope that the producers of the TV series will seriously reflect on the shortcomings of this drama and improve it in future works. In terms of casting, more attention should be paid to the strength of the actors and the matching degree of the role, rather than just pursuing star effect. In terms of character building, it should be closer to history, real and credible, and through in-depth historical research and character building, the audience can more truly feel the historical atmosphere and the fate of the characters in that era. Only in this way can the audience truly feel the charm of spy war dramas, and only then can the cultural products of TV dramas play a greater social value and significance.

In that magnificent era, the spy heroes used their wisdom and courage to write their own legends. They may be hidden in the darkness, drawing the future of the country with silent brushstrokes; Or shuttle between the rain of bullets and bullets, guarding the dignity of the nation with a fearless chest. Their deeds should be remembered, celebrated, and remembered by every generation.

However, the spy war drama "Thrush" failed to present this history to the audience. Its mistake lies not only in the distortion of actor selection and character creation, but also in its failure to dig deep into the true face of that era, and its failure to bring the audience into a world full of tension and excitement, sacrifice and glory.

As viewers, we aspire to a work that touches our hearts and resonates with us. We look forward to seeing the real heroes in the TV series, and seeing their efforts and sacrifices for their beliefs and ideals. We expect to feel the atmosphere of that era in the plot, and feel the pressure and challenges faced by those spy officers.

Therefore, we call on the producers of TV dramas to dig more carefully and deeply into history in future works, and present the audience with a real and vivid world of spy warfare. We hope to see those flesh-and-blood, affectionate and righteous spy personnel, to see their perseverance and struggle in the predicament, and to see their joy and tears after the victory.

At the same time, we also hope that the audience can maintain a rational and objective attitude towards the TV series. When facing a work, we should look at it with a critical eye, find its strengths and weaknesses, and put forward constructive opinions and suggestions. Only in this way can we jointly promote the healthy development of the TV drama industry and let more excellent works emerge.

Finally, let's look forward to those spy war dramas that can truly restore history, portray characters in depth, and resonate with the audience. Let us feel the great deeds of those heroes with our hearts, and experience the historical atmosphere of that special period with our emotions. Let's draw strength from the TV series and inject more courage and hope into our future lives.