A few days ago, Zhang Xuefeng said in the live broadcast room that all liberal arts majors are service industries, which aroused the disgust of many liberal arts students. A few days ago, a fresh liberal arts graduate announced a high-profile prosecution of Zhang Xuefeng, believing that he was suspected of "insult".
Since yesterday, this matter has quickly fermented on the Internet, causing heated discussions among netizens. So, is this a hype or is it true? Are liberal arts students really being "dwarfed"?
Let's first take a look at the indictment of this recent liberal arts graduate circulating on the Internet.
In the indictment, he believes that Zhang Xuefeng, as a public figure, openly criticized the liberal arts and sciences in the live broadcast room as a service industry, and said that it is a "licking" word to sum up. This behavior is suspected of "insult", and Zhang Xuefeng is required to publish an apology statement in domestic provincial newspapers, compensate the plaintiff for 1 yuan for mental damages, and bear all litigation costs.
Some netizens found from this indictment that "Zhang Xuefeng" turned out to be just a screen name, and his real name was "Zhang Zibiao", which was domineering. However, the motive of this indictment has also been questioned by many netizens. Some people think that this fresh liberal arts graduate is not good at learning and arts, and may even want to become famous by rubbing hot spots.
Of course, we cannot rule out the authenticity of this lawsuit. After all, there have been cases where students sued Xiaomi for 1 yuan and eventually won the lawsuit. However, whether this lawsuit can be upheld by the court still needs to wait for the outcome of the court's trial. However, even if the lawsuit is not accepted by the court in the end, or if it is ultimately lost, there is no loss for the fresh liberal arts graduate. On the contrary, if the lawsuit is ultimately won, then he will have a glittering resume that will be a powerful weapon for future employment.
However, having said that, did Zhang Xuefeng's remarks really "dwarf" liberal arts students? To some extent, there are indeed some problems with Zhang Xuefeng's remarks. He classifies all liberal arts majors as service industries, which is clearly an oversimplifying approach. Moreover, he simply classifies the career prospects of liberal arts students as "licking", which is too biased and extreme. This kind of remarks will not only mislead some people's understanding of liberal arts majors, but also have a certain psychological pressure and negative impact on liberal arts students.
However, we cannot deny the importance and value of liberal arts majors. The liberal arts major covers many fields such as history, philosophy, literature, and art, and the research and exploration of these fields are of great significance to the development and progress of human society. And, in real life, there are many successful examples of liberal arts graduates as well. They can make important contributions to society by unleashing their talents and abilities in the fields of media, education, culture and the arts.
We should respect everyone's professional choices and career pursuits. Whether it's liberal arts or science, each major has its own unique value and significance. We should not use oversimplistic ways to evaluate and categorize a particular profession or a certain group of people. Instead, we should respect each individual's individuality and differences, and encourage them to develop their talents and potential in their own fields.