Academician He Zuoxiu recently set off a controversy over Sima Nan's views. His rhetoric was intense, and some netizens even questioned him. But let's look at it from another angle. Sima Nan is a controversial figure, but what is the opinion of Academician He Zuoxiu?
In the long course of history, Marxism has always influenced all parts of the world as an important school of thought. However, with the changes of the times and the development of society, the understanding of Marxism is also constantly evolving. Sima Nan, as a representative of "Sima Nan and his ilk", was criticized by Academician He Zuoxiu as a "political liar of fake Marxists".
This view has sparked a wide range of discussions. But can we look at this issue more objectively?
The core concept of Marxism is permanent revolution, which means that with the development of the times, Marxist theory needs to keep pace with the times and be constantly updated. However, Academician He Zuoxiu's criticism of Sima Nan and his gang seems to be based on their rigid interpretation of the theory of "continuing the revolution". But can it be denied that Sima Nan and his gang have made their own contribution to the development of society to some extent? Perhaps, their ideas are not entirely undesirable.
In addition to the views of Academician He Zuoxiu, we should also pay attention to the different views of all sectors of society on this issue.
Netizens raised questions about his remarks and hoped that he would be able to show more arguments and facts. This also sparked a discussion on the authenticity of Academician He Zuoxiu's remarks. Is Academician He Zuoxiu's remarks true and credible?
In contemporary society, the popularization of the Internet has made the speed of information dissemination more and more rapid. However, the authenticity of the information has become more difficult to discern. The reason why the old academician He Zuoxiu is questioned may be precisely because his remarks on the Internet platform have raised doubts about his authenticity. Is it true that he explained that the typos were due to his hands shaking and that he couldn't use a computer?
Or is there something else?
As netizens said, as an academician, Academician He Zuoxiu's remarks should be fact-oriented, rather than simple accusations and attacks. In today's increasingly complex online public opinion environment, we should maintain a cautious attitude towards information and avoid blindly believing and disseminating unverified statements.
Finally, this controversy over Sima Nan may prompt us to reflect on how to better inherit and develop Marxist thought, and how to accurately understand and disseminate information in the Internet age. This is perhaps a more profound question worth pondering.