laitimes

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.

Introduction:

On March 28, the famous Hong Kong actor Ouyang Zhenhua fell into the torment of sleepless after watching some videos. He then expressed his doubts on Weibo about Japan's construction of schools in Chinese mainland. He was baffled that Chinese students were not allowed to enter these schools, and that only Japanese students were inside, and he was desperate for a reasonable explanation.

Perhaps, this kind of patriotic spirit of daring to openly discuss sensitive topics is not common among celebrities. Many celebrities may know this, but choose to remain silent because talking about these issues may not help their acting careers and may even lead to trouble.

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

The content of the video that Ouyang Zhenhua saw is unknown for the time being, but the authenticity of the facts in it is irrefutable, which is why he posted on Weibo again an hour later, this time he has eliminated doubts about the authenticity of the video. However, he still cannot understand why Japan has closed education in China, and even does not allow Chinese to participate in the education of children, which is strange.

Regarding Ouyang Zhenhua's questions, many well-informed fans patiently answered them in the comment area. They pointed out that in practice there is a similar practice in various countries, and that schools built in foreign countries usually admit only students of their own nationality. At the same time, they also emphasized the fact that China has also established many schools in Japan, which only admit Chinese students, and the teaching content and teachers are from China.

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

Interestingly, however, some fans, while well-intentioned attempts to help Ouyang Zhenhua clear up his doubts, failed to clearly explain why the Japanese built schools in China did not allow Chinese to enter. Does this mean that there is something hidden in it?

Of course, Ouyang Zhenhua's spirit of "ask if you don't understand" is indeed worth learning, however, we must not forget the ancient adage, "existence is reasonable". If there really was any ulterior motive for Japan to establish schools in China, I believe it would have been revealed long ago, and it would not have been possible to keep it secret for a long time, and there must have been a set of internal operating rules.

But if we go back to the facts, closed education is not a good solution. After all, all countries are part of a community with a shared future, and collaboration between countries is essential to achieve sustained prosperity and development. Therefore, closing the country and blocking education is not in line with the trend of the times, and we should be open-minded and seek common ground while reserving differences.

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

According to the current trend of public opinion, the vast majority of people support Ouyang Zhenhua's views, including many Internet influencers. They believe that Ouyang's questioning is reasonable and valid, arguing that how Japan educates its own children in schools in China has nothing to do with China. However, since these schools are located on Chinese soil, they must comply with Chinese laws and regulations, including the content of teaching materials and the way of teaching, which should be audited and supervised by the Chinese education authorities.

As for what the future holds, and whether there will be an authoritative source to answer Ouyang Zhenhua's doubts, this is still unknown. However, this is also the answer that the Chinese people are desperate to get.

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

Revelation:

Ouyang Zhenhua's question has attracted widespread attention, and it has also triggered many people's thinking about education and international relations. This incident tells us that education is an extremely sensitive and complex field, involving many aspects such as national sovereignty, cultural exchanges, and human rights. In this context, we can draw the following takeaways:

First, it takes courage and responsibility to openly discuss sensitive topics. As a public figure, Ouyang Zhenhua dared to ask such questions, which shows his concern for the country and education. His actions remind us that as public figures, there are times when we need to dare to stand up and speak out our doubts in order to spark a wider discussion.

Chinese were not allowed to enter, and Ouyang Zhenhua spoke out for an explanation, dissatisfied with Japan's construction of schools in the interior

Second, cultural exchange requires mutual respect and understanding. It is understandable that there are differences in education systems between different countries and cultures. However, while building schools, we should also consider how to promote cultural exchange and understanding, rather than adopting a closed approach. Only on the basis of mutual respect can true win-win cooperation be achieved.

Furthermore, the purpose of education is to nurture human resources and promote social development. Regardless of the country's education system, its fundamental purpose is to cultivate useful human resources and promote social progress. Therefore, instead of turning education into a narrow nationalist tool, we should open the door to attract outstanding talents from all walks of life to jointly promote the prosperity and development of society.

Summary:

This incident reflects the complex entanglement between education and international relations. Ouyang Zhenhua's question has aroused widespread public attention and made us think about the deep issues behind education. In the process, we can get the following summary:

First of all, education is a complex issue involving multiple dimensions such as national sovereignty and cultural exchanges. When building schools, countries should consider how to promote cultural exchanges and understanding while respecting national sovereignty, and avoid being too closed and narrow-minded.

Secondly, the remarks of public figures have a certain influence, and they dare to ask questions, which has aroused social attention and discussion on education issues. It also reminds us that as public figures, we need to have the courage to take responsibility and speak our minds to promote the progress and development of society.

Finally, the purpose of education is to cultivate talents and promote social development. Although there are differences in the education systems of different countries, the fundamental purpose is to cultivate useful human resources and promote the prosperity and development of society. Therefore, instead of turning education into a narrow nationalist tool, we should open the door to attract outstanding talents from all walks of life to jointly promote the prosperity and development of society.

The above content information is from the Internet, relevant data, and theoretical research on the Internet information, which does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article does not assume any direct or indirect legal responsibility for any of the above or related issues.

Read on