Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is convenient for you to discuss and share, and can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support.
Text/Arey
Editor/Arrey
Note: The original is not easy, plagiarism and manuscript washing will be deeply studied. The picture comes from the Internet, if the infringement please contact to delete.
This article is only published in Toutiao, articles on other platforms are counterfeit.
Military news one: Gaza residents were ordered to evacuate from hospitals, and Israel is suspected of not calling for itself, and wants to openly bomb hospitals
The attack on a hospital in the Gaza Strip drew widespread condemnation. Countries in the region have said it carried out airstrikes on the hospital, but Israel has vehemently denied it and blamed the military group Jihad in the Gaza Strip. In addition, the United States also supports Israel, and after so-called investigations, has publicly stated that Israel is not the perpetrator of the attack on the Gaza hospital.
However, whether it is admitted or denied, this incident cannot be ignored. Israel is under intense international pressure, leading to new orders for the evacuation of Gaza residents from hospitals.
Against this background, the Palestine Red Crescent Society stated that it had received a warning from the Israeli military for the immediate evacuation of Al-Quds Hospital in the Gaza Strip. Currently, the hospital houses more than 400 patients and 12,000 displaced civilians. The Palestine Red Crescent Society calls on the international community to take urgent action to prevent another incident such as the bombing of a Baptist hospital.
Compared to the background of the attack on Baptist hospitals, Israel's new order appears to be self-defeating. Israel's intentions seem quite clear, and it seems that they want to bomb hospitals in good faith in preparation for carpet bombing of the Gaza Strip. According to Norwegian doctor and humanitarian Mez Gilbert, the area around Al-Quds Hospital has been bombed and Israelis are frustrated by the inability to empty the hospital. The constant airstrikes appear to be designed to scare evacuees in hospitals into leaving the hospital feeling unsafe. This partly explains the Israeli attack on the Baptist hospital, which may have been an attempt to scare the civilians inside the hospital but accidentally destroyed it.
Israel had previously issued orders to evacuate the population of Gaza and was now demanding that the Palestinian Red Crescent Society evict civilians from hospitals. Although seemingly motivated by humanitarian concerns for civilians, in reality, these Israeli orders could trigger a serious humanitarian crisis. These orders were issued in the context of the blockade of the Gaza Strip, which has resulted in inaccessibility and external assistance, as well as water and electricity outages and constant bombardment.
In such cases, mass evacuations could increase the risk of civilian deaths. Hamas has said that Israel has carried out airstrikes against civilians who obey evacuation orders, with serious consequences. Now, some evacuated civilians have returned to their homes, preferring to stay in their homes rather than brave artillery fire to go south.
The current chaotic situation in the Gaza Strip shows that it will not be easy for Israel to completely eliminate Hamas. A total blockade of the Gaza Strip has sparked international outrage, with every withdrawal order provoking condemnation. However, if Israel does not take these measures, carpet bombing will not be possible, and the lifting of the blockade and aid entry could allow Hamas personnel to escape, leaving the Gaza Strip empty and Israeli military operations meaningless.
Whatever the cause, attacks on civilians are grave mistakes and violations of international law and the laws of war. Israel is already internationally isolated, and if it continues to create a humanitarian crisis, it could provoke the anger of the Arab world. Ultimately, peace and stability in the Middle East can be achieved only through dialogue and diplomatic efforts. It is hoped that all parties will think rationally and seek ways to resolve the issue in order to avoid harm to innocent civilians and further tension.
Military news two: US media: At the same time funding Ukraine and Israel, how long can the United States be generous"?
A major challenge facing Congress is how to balance domestic needs with foreign aid, especially with a focus on both the Middle East and Ukraine. This challenge has not only worried Congress, but also raised a series of questions about how much the United States can afford. This article will analyze the cost of war and foreign aid from an objective perspective, explore the trade-offs that Congress may face, and how U.S. foreign policy and international standing may change in this context.
The United States has been one of the largest aid providers in the world. Recently, the United States has provided tens of billions of dollars in aid to Ukraine aimed at supporting its resistance to Russian aggression. In addition, US President Joe Biden called for tens of billions of dollars worth of new aid to Ukraine and Israel. This shows that the United States is becoming more determined in supporting its allies and partners.
Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the United States has provided nearly $44 billion in military aid to Ukraine. Meanwhile, Israel recently launched a conflict against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and the United States quickly sent a massive military force to the region, including two aircraft carriers, 13 warships, more than 100 fighter jets and 2,000 Marines. U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin stressed that the United States will stand firmly behind its allies, no matter how daunting the challenges are.
However, in the face of such a huge aid package, one wonders, can the United States afford it? According to the U.S. Government Spending website, the Department of Defense's budget for the fiscal year amounted to $1.8 trillion. Despite this large amount, the U.S. aid program does not come from the defense budget alone, but also from other sources of resources. These resources may include government debt, foreign policy priorities, and sacrifices in domestic projects.
However, when providing assistance to Ukraine and Israel, the U.S. government must weigh various interests. A senior adviser to the Center for Strategic and International Studies noted that over time, the United States may need to make some adjustments, possibly reducing weapons aid to Ukraine and providing more important weapons systems to Israel. This could raise a complex set of foreign policy issues, including how to strike a balance between maintaining international and regional stability.
Congress will play a decisive role in determining whether to provide more aid to Ukraine and Israel. However, there are differences between different political parties and political factions. Some Republicans oppose increased aid, arguing that the U.S. should focus more on domestic issues such as border security. Representatives of this view include Representative Marjorie Taylor Green, a key ally of former US President Donald Trump. She made it clear that she was against the continued funding of Ukraine and advocated using it for domestic needs.
On the other hand, however, some politicians firmly believe that U.S. foreign aid is a key means of ensuring international stability and promoting democracy. U.S. presidential candidate Ron DeSantis pointed out that the United States has long supported Israel, providing tens of billions of dollars in aid, which helps maintain peace and security in the Middle East. He raised the question of how to ensure that these funds are used to actually safeguard U.S. national interests and are not misused or wasted.
The U.S. role in international affairs is complex and diverse, and foreign aid is a key element of its international policy. With a focus on both Ukraine and Israel, the U.S. government has had to make informed decisions with limited resources. Balancing domestic needs with international responsibilities will be an ongoing challenge, but also an area of opportunity.
Through prudent decision-making and effective foreign policy, the United States can continue to play an important role on the international stage and ensure that its aid money is used to support international peace, security, and prosperity. This requires close cooperation between Congress and the Government to address changing international challenges while meeting the needs of the domestic population. Ultimately, the United States will need to find a balance between national interests and international obligations to contribute positively to global stability and prosperity.
Military news three: The Ministry of Defense responded: the Chinese army entered high alert! Don't give each other a chance!
On October 20, 2023, the Chinese Ministry of Defense issued a response in response to recent accusations by the U.S. Department of Defense accusing the PRC of conducting so-called "coercive and adventurous operations" in the East and South China Seas. This incident has aroused widespread concern in the international community, not only involving Sino-US relations, but also the issue of peace and stability in the entire region.
First of all, it needs to be clear that the issue of naval and air military security between China and the United States is not sudden, and the fundamental reason lies in the frequent provocative behavior of US warships and aircraft in China's surrounding areas. Data show that in 2023 alone, US reconnaissance aircraft carried out more than 2,000 close arrivals, while US warships repeatedly intruded into China's Xisha territorial waters and the Taiwan Strait. These actions sparked tensions and led to subsequent incidents.
Against this background, in order to safeguard national sovereignty and territorial integrity, China has taken a series of legal measures to verify, track and warn foreign warships and aircraft that have illegally intruded, and taken countermeasures when necessary. This is a measure taken by any sovereign state to safeguard the security and interests of the country.
However, the US side is trying to smear China by hyping up the "Chinese military threat", which is undesirable. In response, Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Zhang Xiaogang stressed that the US accusation was a premeditated attack with hidden political aims. This narrative misleads international public opinion and makes it difficult to understand the truth.
In the face of this situation, we cannot help but ask, where will Sino-US relations go in the future? Will the two sides be able to establish relations of mutual trust, cooperation and peace? This is not only an unanswered question, but also a major issue that the entire international community is paying close attention to.
In fact, the interaction between China and the United States is full of challenges and cooperation games. First, we need to recognize that China and the United States are among the world's largest economies, and they play important roles in international affairs. The interaction between the two sides has far-reaching implications for the global economy and security landscape.
However, as mentioned earlier, there are naval and air military security issues between China and the United States, which increases tensions between the two sides. In order to improve relations, it is first necessary for the two sides to stop using generalized and confusing narratives, and instead engage in dialogue and cooperation based on objectivity, impartiality and facts. This helps to eliminate misunderstandings and miscalculations and reduce tensions.
On the other hand, the United States also needs to strictly control the activities of its military and prevent unnecessary provocations. Trust is very valuable in international relations, and provocative acts only undermine it, leading to dangerous consequences.
China and the United States should realize that cooperation is far more beneficial than confrontation. On global issues, such as climate change, terrorism, and infectious diseases, China and the United States can cooperate and make greater contributions to global peace and stability. This benefits not only both countries, but also the international community as a whole.
Finally, it needs to be emphasized that facts speak louder than words. Through objective, fair, and fact-based dialogue and cooperation, the United States and China are expected to address current challenges and build a more stable and peaceful relationship. This is not only in the interests of both countries, but also contributes to the realization of global peace and prosperity.
In short, the issue of naval and air military security between China and the United States is a complex and sensitive issue, which should be resolved through dialogue and cooperation on the basis of objectivity, impartiality and facts. Only through joint efforts can we achieve the goals of mutual trust, cooperation and peace and make greater contributions to global peace and stability. This is the common responsibility of China and the United States, and it is also the expectation of the international community.