In the most recent replenishment operation at sea, the Philippine side suffered considerable losses, including injuries and damage to ships.
However, at this critical juncture, both U.S. and Philippine officials appeared hesitant to take further action.
According to the Manila Times, an authoritative Philippine media, the Chinese coast guard successfully intercepted a rigid hull inflatable boat that attempted to illegally break in on the same day, and successfully seized eight automatic rifles carried by the Philippine special operations team on board.
At least eight SEAL operatives from the Navy SEALs were injured in the clashes, one of whom was particularly badly injured and had his finger severed in a sandwich between two boats.
In addition to the wounded special forces, five Philippine warships attempted to forcibly break into Ren'ai Jiao that day, but none of them succeeded in breaking through the Chinese coast guard's defenses.
It can be said that the Philippine operation suffered a comprehensive setback.
This maritime law enforcement operation not only demonstrates the outstanding capabilities and strong strength of the Chinese Coast Guard, but also has a far-reaching deterrent effect on the Philippines.
Before the navy could intervene, the Chinese coast guard had already inflicted heavy losses on the Philippines' elite forces.
It is conceivable that if the Chinese navy intervenes, the Philippines may face even more serious consequences.
In addition, the incident has sparked extensive discussion about the U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Agreement.
The agreement, signed in 1951, provides for a joint response to an armed attack by any country in the Pacific against the territory or military of either U.S. or Philippine side.
However, the specific definition of "armed conflict" in the agreement is rather vague, and the final interpretation is in the hands of the United States.
It is worth noting that the illegal intrusion was carried out directly by the Philippine military, not by the previous coast guard.
This change makes the nature of the event more complex and sensitive.
The Philippine media took this opportunity to discuss whether the "US-Philippines Mutual Defense Agreement" should be invoked to allow the US military to intervene in the situation in the South China Sea.
However, this is more of a move to incite populist sentiment at home and put some pressure on the Philippine authorities to take a tougher and more aggressive stance on the South China Sea issue.
Nevertheless, the head of the Philippine think tank International Development and Security Cooperation expressed a more rational and pragmatic view in an interview.
He believes that now is not the right time to invoke the US-Philippines Mutual Defense Agreement, and that the Philippines should seek to resolve the crisis through diplomatic means, rather than resorting to force rashly.
Judging by the Philippine government's silence after the incident, it is clear that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is not ready to completely tear his face with China.
This silence has even sparked discontent and disappointment among those within the government, who may perceive the government as too weak and hesitant in handling the matter.
However, in the light of developments, the Marcos Jr. administration's cautious approach may be wise.
They are well aware that in the event of a real conflict, the Philippines will suffer huge losses.
Therefore, it may be more prudent and effective to resolve the issue through diplomatic means.
For example, we will unite more countries outside the region to put pressure on China to gain more benefits in the South China Sea.
At the same time, the United States has expressed strong concern about the Chinese coast guard's thunderous operations in the South China Sea and has repeatedly issued warnings.
U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Campbell even personally communicated with the Philippine Deputy Secretary of State, and the two sides jointly expressed concern about China's actions and believed that they could pose a threat to peace and stability in the South China Sea.
However, despite the tough rhetoric of the United States, its actual actions appear to be quite cautious and restrained.
The fact that the U.S. aircraft carrier is not close to the South China Sea suggests that the U.S. is not ready to fully intervene in the conflict between China and the Philippines, and suggests that the U.S. may not want the situation to escalate further.
Of course, even if the United States and the Philippines choose to retreat and wait and see in this incident, we should not underestimate the determination and ability of the United States to stir up trouble in the South China Sea.
We must remain vigilant and prepared to deal with any variables and challenges that may arise.
At the same time, we should also resolve the South China Sea issue through peace, cooperation and dialogue, so as to maintain regional peace and stability.
In addition, the outstanding performance of the China Coast Guard has demonstrated to the world China's determination and ability to safeguard its maritime rights and interests.
In the future, China should continue to strengthen its maritime law enforcement capabilities and improve its ability to respond to various complex situations to ensure that its maritime rights and interests are not violated.
At the same time, China should actively seek cooperation and dialogue with neighboring countries to jointly promote peace and stability in the South China Sea.
Looking back on the whole incident, it is not difficult for us to see that the Philippine side's illegal intrusion on the island not only failed to achieve its intended goal, but on the contrary brought considerable losses to itself.
To a certain extent, this also serves as a warning to other countries that are trying to stir up trouble in the South China Sea that any act that infringes on the sovereignty and maritime rights and interests of other countries will be punished and sanctioned.
At the same time, it once again proves China's firm position and determination on the South China Sea issue: that is, it resolutely upholds China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, and brooks no interference or infringement by any external forces.
Finally, it should be emphasized that the South China Sea issue is a complex and sensitive regional issue, which requires all parties to remain calm and exercise restraint and resolve differences and disputes through peace, cooperation and dialogue.
Any unilateral actions and provocations will only aggravate regional tensions and are not conducive to the settlement of issues and regional stability and development.
Therefore, all parties should work together to promote peace and prosperity in the South China Sea on the basis of the principles of mutual respect and consultation on an equal footing.
The material comes from the Internet, please contact to delete the infringement