The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
With the fall of the Afghan government, President Ghani resigned and fled, and it was rumored that he was stuffed with cash with 4 cars and 1 helicopter. But the story behind the "runaway president" goes far beyond that: he was an innocent, powerless scholar with a doctorate and a former member of the United Nations and the World Bank. Today, the 72-year-old former president enjoys his greedy fortune in exile, but also bears the stigma of betraying his country.
Ghani are Pashtun, the largest ethnic group in Afghanistan, and the vast majority of members of the Taliban are Pashtuns. After 9/11 in 2001, the United States sent troops to overthrow the Taliban regime, and their main ally was the Northern Alliance, a group of various ethnic minorities. These warlords have power in the government, but this poses some problems for the United States and its allies.
First, these warlords each have their own power and territory, do not obey the command of the West, and are therefore seen as difficult to control. Second, most of these warlords belong to ethnic minorities, and the West wants to establish a government that represents the interests of the majority, which will help their influence in Afghanistan. Finally, the Afghan government was so deeply corrupt and rent-seeking that the United States and its allies felt that these warlords and their proxies could not be allowed to retain government power.
It was in this context that Ghani became a highly anticipated presidential candidate. He is an ethnic Pashtun, has no ties to the Taliban, and is a scholar-type figure who is more likely to establish friendly relations with the West. The West hopes that he will help suppress the warlord forces and strengthen the government's authority and administrative capacity.
However, the problem of Ghani's corruption is obvious. Although the United States and the West supported his rise to power in the hope that he would not be corrupt, the reality was that he was not much better than his predecessors or enemies. His corruption is mainly manifested in the funding of international aid projects, involving post-war reconstruction projects and illegal manipulation of administrative expenses. Afghanistan's long civil war and disorder have brought down the entire state system, and many of the powerful are involved in corruption and rent-seeking of power, so that almost no one is innocent in this environment.
There are rumors that Ghani fled with cash from 4 pickups, but this claim may be open to investigation. As a high-ranking intellectual with a doctorate, Ghani will not run away with a lot of cash like a bandit. These rumors may need to be treated with greater caution.
As for Ghani's choice to flee to Oman, there were initial rumors that he might travel to Uzbekistan, as the Uzbek warlord Dostum was also on the run, and there was speculation that Ghani might travel with him. But this is likely to be a smokebomb, as Dostum has a long record of betrayal, and walking with him would pose more risks to Ghani.
Then there was news that Ghani had fled to Tajikistan, but only for a short time. Now he is looking for a longer-term place of refuge, and three countries have offered to accept him: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania and Canada. Among them, Canada has a tradition of accepting foreign refugees, which may become his next home.
Another theory is that Ghani may be heading to Israel, but that is unlikely. Firstly, Ghani's wife is not Israeli, and secondly, as an exiled president of Afghanistan, traveling to Israel would worsen his political reputation, since Israel does not open its doors to foreign refugees. As a result, Ghani may carefully consider his next move among the options.
Looking at the past and present of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, we can draw some profound lessons. First, the history of a political leader is not necessarily indicative of his or her future performance, because Ghani was an innocent, scholarly intellectual who was eventually stigmatized by corruption and political turmoil. This tells us that a leader's qualities and behaviors are often influenced by circumstances and power, not just by his or her personal traits.
Second, the complexity of international politics sometimes forces forces to choose between ostensibly innocent but corrupt leaders. Ghani came to power with the support of Western countries, but also eventually fell victim to corruption and political disputes. This highlights the realism and intrigue in international politics, which can face trade-offs and compromises even in pursuit of the goals of democracy and clean government.
Moreover, Afghanistan's long civil war and disorder have provided a breeding ground for corruption and rent-seeking of power, not just Ghani, but almost all the people involved. This reflects the enormous influence of the social and political environment on individual behavior. We can see that eradicating corruption requires not only reforming the leadership, but also improving the institutions and culture of the entire country.
In summary, Ghani's story offers profound lessons about politics, power, and corruption. His rise and fall reflect the intrigue and power game in politics, as well as the complexity of leaders. In addition, the political and social environment in Afghanistan has influenced the spread of corruption. Improving the situation will require broader reforms and long-term efforts, not just a change of leaders.
At the same time, it also reminds us to pay attention to the complexities and trade-offs behind international politics to better understand the development and impact of events. Ultimately, Ghani's fate became a classic example of how there is no absolute innocence in politics, and that leaders are sometimes unavoidable under the intense pressure of power struggles and corruption.
Continuing to dig deeper, Ghani's choice to flee to Oman also raises some key questions. There may be more political motives behind this exile. First of all, Oman has always been a relatively neutral country in international politics, with a stable political situation and a peaceful foreign policy. This makes Oman an ideal place for exiled politicians to seek refuge. For Ghani, Oman may have been chosen to seek a relatively safe haven to plan for a future political career or diplomatic mediation. In addition, Oman has some influence in the international arena, which could help Ghani play a greater role in political negotiations.
However, Ghani's choice also reflects his isolation on the domestic political scene. By the time he fled the country, Afghanistan was already in the hands of the Taliban, and his political supporters and allies were on the verge of collapse at home. This suggests that Ghani's political prospects have become very limited, and he may no longer be qualified as a domestic political leader. In addition, Ghani's flight could lead to further complication of domestic politics, as his supporters may continue to rebel against the Taliban, which could spark more conflict and instability.
Ghani's choice of the next place of exile will also be the focus of international political attention. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania and Canada have all expressed their willingness to accept him, but this involves the complexity of international political and diplomatic relations. These countries need to carefully weigh the domestic and international political pressures that Ghani's arrival could provoke, and whether he will become a controversial figure in their domestic politics. Moreover, the admission of Ghani may also involve international support and intervention for Afghanistan's future.
Ultimately, Ghani's story represents the interweaving of international politics and domestic affairs, and how the fate of leaders has been shaped by political circumstances and history. His exile raises many questions, including how the international community is dealing with the political situation in Afghanistan, how it responds to Taliban rule and how it helps the Afghan people through difficult times. The story also reminds us that the complexity of political decision-making and individual behavior requires deeper analysis and understanding to better respond to future political challenges.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.