The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete. This article is only published in today's headlines, please do not move.
In the Tokyo Trial Court in 1945, Puyi angrily denounced the Japanese war criminals, and he resolutely stood up to testify to expose the crimes of the Japanese army. However, the trial was not all smooth sailing, and a shameful scene emerged behind it. In the face of the arrogant attitude of Japanese war criminals, Chinese judge Mei Ruxuan worked hard to win and successfully convicted the first batch of war criminals, but in the subsequent trial, the Japanese side took the opportunity to falsely claim that "there is insufficient evidence."
All this happened in a courtroom without gunfire, and Chinese judges held thick files documenting the crimes of the Japanese army against China in World War II. Mei Ruxuan knows that he shoulders the expectations of the people of the whole country, and he wants to seek justice for millions of his compatriots. However, the criminals refused to admit their guilt under the pretext of "insufficient evidence", and even pretended to be crazy and stupid. After Japan's defeat, evidence of crimes was destroyed and witnesses were silenced. It is infuriating that some countries that have not been invaded intercede on behalf of war criminals and try to downplay their crimes under the pretext of so-called "humanitarianism".
Mei Ruxuan was extremely angry and unwilling to downplay the Japanese army's great humiliation of the Chinese people. At the standoff, a man in a bespectacled suit walked into the courtroom claiming to prove the crimes committed by war criminals in China. His identity stunned the people in the court, it turned out to be Puyi.
Puyi, the last emperor of the Qing Dynasty, served as a puppet in the Japanese puppet Manchurian regime and became the king of the fallen country. However, during the trial, he showed a firm gaze and introduced himself: "I am Aixin Jue Luo Puyi, I became the emperor of China in 08, and by 11, Sun Yat-sen led the Kuomintang to overthrow the Qing government, and I abdicated." His words are shocking, why would this "traitor" who was once ousted by Sun Yat-sen testify for China in court?
Puyi's life is like a tragedy. In 1908, he ascended the throne at the age of 3, and after Sun Yat-sen overthrew the Qing government, Puyi became a prisoner. After the Japanese occupation of Tohoku, he was lured into becoming a "former emperor", subject to the Japanese army, and became a puppet of the enemy. However, during his capture in the Soviet Union, he realized that he could not escape the fate of trial and was determined to testify against the crimes of the Japanese army.
Puyi's testimony lasted for eight days, pointing out the crimes of Japanese war criminals in China and delving into the dark history of the Japanese puppet Manchurian regime. Under his clear statement, the Japanese defense lawyer repeatedly interrupted in an attempt to divert the focus. However, Puyi not only skillfully responded to the trap, but also stood firm against the Japanese threat.
In the end, judges from many countries voted unanimously, and seven Japanese class-A war criminals, including Hideki Tojo, were sentenced to death by hanging. Puyi's key testimony became key to the conviction. After completing his historical mission, he returned to the Soviet Union to be imprisoned. Extradited to China in 1950, he was not sent to the execution ground, but to undergo labor and ideological reform. Ten years later, Puyi became a legal citizen and was even granted amnesty, and Premier Zhou offered him a job as a gardener.
In 1976, Puyi, the last emperor of China's feudal dynasty, died of illness, ending a tragic life.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or allude to any real country, political system, organization, race, individual. The above does not mean that the author of this article endorses the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising above or related to any of the above, nor does it assume any direct or indirect legal liability.