CEIBS fund Gülen lost 23.4 billion yuan, and Wells Fargo Fund Wang Fried.
CEIBS Fund Gülen lost 23.4 billion yuan, Wells Fargo Fund Wang Banghe lost 23 billion yuan, E Fangda Fan Bing lost 190.8 billion yuan, Yu Fangda and Yu Haiyan lost 18 billion yuan, Yida Fund Zhang Shengxian lost 11.1 billion yuan, and Huabao Fund.
Hu Jie lost 11 billion yuan, Yi Fangda Lin Weibin lost 10.5 billion yuan, and E Fangda Zhang Kun lost 9.9 billion yuan. In the past two years, CEIBS Fund Medicine Goddess Gülen has fallen from the altar and changed from the Lanlan Goddess who everyone praises to Aunt Ge. The funds it manages, equity funds: CEIBS Healthcare Innovation Equity A and CEIBS Healthcare Innovation Equity C Hybrid Fund, CEIBS Healthcare Hybrid C and CEIBS Healthcare Hybrid A both have maximum drawdowns of more than 50%. If you want to return to the highest point or break through a new high, then from the current position, you need to rise 100% to return to the capital.
A few days ago, a post from Xueqiu went viral, and a blogger said that Liu Gesong actually selected a three-year closed mixed fund unit with a net value of 0.49 yuan for the GF industry managed by Liu Gexiang. If the financing had already exploded. This is a three-year closed fund, and the people in it have no chance to run if they want to.
Liu Gexiang's domestic top fund manager once controlled the fund size of 90 billion, but with the continuous shrinking of net worth, he changed from a 90 billion big name to an 80 billion top stream, 70 billion top stream, and 60 billion top stream. In the first half of this year, Liu Gexiang's fund once again lost nearly 4 billion yuan, shrinking to the top 50 billion.
Recently, a fund maximum drawdown ratio conference circulated on the Internet, Liu Gexiang ranked second in the drawdown list of top public fund managers: the drawdown was as high as nearly 68%. The first place in the drawdown range is Cai Songsong, the first brother of semiconductors, with a drawdown of more than 71%.
Now he has said goodbye to the people. Relying on old knowledge will not solve new problems, but will make the losses of the funds it manages more and more serious, and many people will completely lose trust in it. But then again, what about losing trust? Isn't lying down and earning management fees the most comfortable way for him?