The content of this article comes from the Internet, if it is inconsistent with the actual situation or there is infringement, please contact to delete.
In early August, Taiwanese artist Li Liqun, after 22 days of silence, finally returned to the stage with a picture of "there is only one China in the world", and self-evidently stated his position. This action triggered a warm response from netizens, who expressed their thoughts and welcome to him, shouting for him to post a video quickly. However, there are also those who are cynical about his return, saying he is giving in.
At the same time, a crisis in early August revealed the true face of many Taiwanese artists. The words of Tian Fuzhen, Yan Yalun and others were full of yin and yang strangeness, and they seemed to be trying to play duplicity. One connotates the phrase "swollen face and fat people", and the other jokingly claims that he loves to eat "Taiwanese" and "American" breakfast, but is reluctant to touch Chinese breakfast. This hypocrisy will eventually be exposed in front of the country, and their cause on the mainland is destined to go to a low ebb.
Although Jolin Tsai remained silent, her past remarks were picked up, her personality was seriously questioned, and even CCTV quickly deleted content related to her. At this critical moment, many Taiwanese artists chose to remain silent, but Li Liqun received special attention, because he was interviewed by Taiwan media after returning to Taiwan, but his words in the interview were inappropriate, and he was accused by netizens of being a "wall grass", which was disappointing.
In the interview, Taiwan media emphasized that although Li Liqun has not completely retired, he will continue filming in Taiwan and will no longer get involved in Chinese mainland's acting career. However, Li Liqun expressed on 16 July that he looked forward to peaceful reunification of the two sides of the strait, which clearly stated his position. But on 17 July, he clarified that his answer had been misinterpreted and seemed to avoid certain questions. Li Liqun did not respond clearly to the statement that he would not return to the mainland to film, but he mentioned that his father's grave was in the mainland, and he would go back to visit the grave every year, and planned to bury his mother in Taiwan so as not to cause trouble to his children.
On the whole, Li Liqun is not not returning to the mainland, but no longer accepts film and television work on the mainland. However, there are still questions about his answer, otherwise the Taiwan media would not have been able to fabricate the content of the video interview. This time, Li Liqun's return and statement are undoubtedly "slap in the face" to some Taiwan media. In fact, patriotism should not be so complicated, as Huang An said: "If you really love the motherland, you should not hide it, unless you have bad intentions." "It's better to forward a Weibo picture than not to speak up, I hope that under the leadership of Li Liqun, more artists dare to express their position, so that all doubts will also be solved."
This series of events reflects that Taiwanese artists are facing great public opinion pressure and challenges in choosing to express their position and remain silent against the background of tense cross-strait relations. However, whichever way they choose, it will profoundly affect their career development and public image on both sides of the strait. For Li Liqun, his return marks his firm support for the one-China principle, and is also a response to individual Taiwan media, and at the same time makes more people rethink their positions and responsibilities. It is hoped that in the future, artists will be able to express their views more rationally and make positive contributions to the peace and development of cross-strait relations.
The above content and materials are derived from the Internet, relevant data, theoretical research in the Internet materials, does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. We are not responsible for any issues arising above or in connection with the above and the author of this article do not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.